Примери за използване на Recognition is sought на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In the member state in which recognition is sought.
A court in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another EU country may stay the proceedings, if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.
As candidates from the country in which recognition is sought;
A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.
If such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought;
(a) if such recognition is manifestly contrary to the public policy of the Member State in which recognition is sought, though refusal may not result in any form of discrimination prohibited under Article 21 of the Charter; or.
If such recognition is manifestly contrary to public order in the Member State in which recognition is sought;
A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in Ireland or the United Kingdom may stay the proceedings if enforcement is suspended in the Member State of origin by reason of an appeal.
If it is irreconcilable with a decision given in a dispute between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought;
The person concerned cannot rely on the possibility of raising those irregularities before a court of the State in which recognition is sought, since the rules relating to judicial protection are comparable in the two States.
If it is irreconcilable with a decision given in proceedings between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought;
A court of a Contracting State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in Ireland or the United Kingdom may stay the proceedings if enforcement is suspended in the State in which the judgment was given by reason of an appeal.
(a) if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought.
When recognition is sought in Greece, Greek courts may refuse the recognition of a judgment on parental responsibility when:(a) it is contrary to domestic public policy, always taking into account the child's best interests;
The process begins with the filing of an application directly to the Court of First Instance of the place of domicile of the person against whom recognition is sought.
(a) if such recognition is manifestly contrary to the public policy of the member state in which recognition is sought taking into account the best interest of the child;
Thus, consideration must likewise be given to the relationship between the case in the main proceedings andthe legal order of the State in which recognition is sought.
And whether the judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in proceedings between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought, or in another Member State or in a non-member state if the judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the Member State in which recognition is sought. .
When determining whether there is a manifest breach of public policy stemming from the infringement of the fundamental rules of EU law,the court of the State in which recognition is sought must take account of the fact that the person opposing the recognition of the judgment in that State failed to make use of the legal remedies available to him in the State of origin.
According to Advocate General Alber, erroneous rulings can also be handed down and acquire res judicata in the State in which recognition is sought.
(Reference for apreliminary ruling- Judicial cooperation in civil matters- Regulation(EC) No 44/2001- Recognition and enforcement of judgments- Grounds for refusing enforcement- Infringement of public policy in the State in which recognition is sought- Judgment given by a court in another Member State contrary to EU law on trade marks- Directive 2004/48/EC- Enforcement of intellectual property rights- Legal costs).
(20) In accordance with that article, a judgment is not to be recognised if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the State in which recognition is sought.
As observed by the Advocate General in point 82 of his Opinion,the exclusion of review of the jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of origin implies, as a correlation, a restriction of the power of the court of the Member State in which recognition is sought to ascertain its own jurisdiction because the latter is bound by what was decided by the court of the Member State of origin.
According to Article 34(1),a judgment is not to be recognised if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought.
Its judgment, has decided a preliminary question concerning the status or legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills orsuccession in a way that conflicts with a rule of the private international law of the State in which the recognition is sought, unless the same result would have been reached by the application of the rules of private international law of that State;
Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 provides that a judgment must not be recognised if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought.
If the court of the State of origin, in order to arrive at its judgement, has decided a preliminary question concerning the status or legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills orsuccession in a way that conflicts with a rule of the private international law of the State in which the recognition is sought, unless the same result would have been reached by the application of the rules of private international law of that State.
Under Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001,‘[a]judgment shall not be recognised… if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought'.
Article 27( 3) provides that a judgment is not to be recognized if it is irreconcilable with a judgment given in a dispute between the same parties in the State in which recognition is sought.