Примери за използване на Such infringements на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
We retain the right to examine incidences which may involve such infringements.
And believe me, the organism of such infringements and even mockery of oneself simply does not forgive.
This already exceeded the 18-month target set by the Commission to resolve such infringements.
Therefore, the proportion of the value of sales taken into account for such infringements will generally be set at the higher end of the scale.'.
It said a hotspot operator may be required to password-protect its network in order tobring an end to, or prevent, such infringements.
The answer seems rather simple at first glance: the service provider should be liable for such infringements because he is a trader providing services within the framework of his occupation.
However, such an operator may be required to password-protect the network in order tobring an end to, or prevent, such infringements.
They cited the legal code which stipulates arrests and fines for such infringements and accused Greek authorities of looking the other way as their Turkish counterparts engage in illegal activities.
On the other hand, where such infringements are systematic, they undermine the public interest and there is therefore a need to provide for the protection of those who report such infringements. .
At the same time, he/she makes recommendations to the perpetrators of infringements on howto rectify them and on the reasons for and consequences of such infringements.
It is not therefore contrary to the principle that responsibility for such infringements is personal in nature, it does not ignore the individual analysis of the incriminating evidence and it does not breach the rights of defence of the undertakings involved.
Asks the Authority to inform the discharge authority about alleged and confirmed infringements of ethics rules,about how it has dealt with such infringements, and how it will avoid them in the future;
Generally, such infringements consist in the dissemination of the same content as that protected or, at least, a content resembling the protected content, any changes in that content, which are sometimes difficult to make, requiring specific intervention.
In order to ensure deterrence of the fines,Member States should set in their national law the maximum fine for such infringements at a level that is at least 4% of the trader's annual turnover in the Member State concerned.
Member States shall establish effective and reliable mechanisms to encourage the reporting of potential or actual infringements of national provisions transposing this Directive to competent authorities,including secure communication channels for reporting such infringements.
The existence of repeated infringements by the same perpetrator shows its propensity to commit such infringements and is therefore a very significant indication that the level of the penalty needs to be increased to achieve effective deterrence.
However, if there are to be executive measures on the basis of such an agreement that provide for infringements of citizens' fundamental freedoms,the legal protection of citizens against such infringements must be absolutely guaranteed.
Repeated infringements by the same perpetrator shows a propensity to commit such infringements and is therefore a significant indication of the gravity of the conduct and, accordingly, of the need to increase the level of the penalty to achieve effective deterrence.
In particular, calls for assurances to be given that an investigation will be opened, following allegations that infringements were committed during operations coordinated by the Frontex agency, and that appropriate measures, of a disciplinary or other nature,will be taken against those who are shown to have committed such infringements;
In order to ensure that the fines have a deterrent effect,Member States should set in their national law the maximum fine for such infringements at a level that is at least 4% of the trader's annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concerned.
Any natural or legal person other than end-users adversely affected by infringements of this Regulation, including a provider of electronic communications services protecting its legitimate business interests,shall have a right to bring legal proceedings in respect of such infringements.
The existence of repeated infringements by the same perpetrator shows its propensity to commit such infringements and is therefore a very significant indication of the gravity of the conduct in question and accordingly of the need to increase the level of the penalty to achieve effective deterrence.
Any natural or legal person other than end-users adversely affected by infringements of this Regulation and having a legitimate interest in the cessation or prohibition of alleged infringements, including a provider of electronic communications services protecting its legitimate business interests,shall have a right to bring legal proceedings in respect of such infringements.
Repeated infringement by the same perpetrator shows a propensity to commit such infringements and is therefore a significant indication of the gravity of the conduct and, accordingly, of the need to increase the level of the penalty to achieve effective deterrence.
To ensure that Member States' authorities can impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in relation to widespread infringements and to widespread infringements with a Union dimension that are subject to coordinated investigation andenforcement measures in accordance with Regulation(EU) 2017/2394, fines should be introduced as an element of penalties for such infringements.
The existence of repeated infringements by the same perpetrator shows its propensity to commit such infringements and is therefore a very significant indication of the gravity of the conduct in question and accordingly of the need to increase the level of the penalty to achieve effective deterrence.
(9)To ensure that Member State authorities can impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in relation to widespread infringements of consumer law and to widespread infringements with a Union dimension that are subject to coordinated investigation andenforcement in accordance with Regulation(EU) 2017/2394, fines should be introduced as a mandatory element of penalties for such infringements.
It is not therefore contrary to the principle that responsibility for such infringements is personal in nature, it does not ignore the individual analysis of the incriminating evidence and it does not breach the rights of defence of the undertakings involved(Commission v Anic Partecipazioni, cited in paragraph 150 above, paragraphs 83, 84 and 203, and HFB and Others v Commission, cited in paragraph 150 above, paragraph 231).
Private individuals and entities should seek court orders ceasing infringements of their rights granted by EU law(so called"injunctive relief") andto claim damages for harm caused by such infringements(so called"compensatory relief") in a situation where a large number of persons is harmed by the same illegal practice.