Примери за използване на The CHMP was of the view на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Therefore the CHMP was of the view that the prophylaxis indication continues to be appropriate for all formulations.
After evaluating data from studies andpost-marketing data from outside the EU, the CHMP was of the view that there was adequate evidence that Seasonique is an effective contraceptive.
Lastly the CHMP was of the view that further additions to the lists of interactants would be of value, based on an updated survey.
Furthermore, in addition to a strengthening of the monitoring of renal function, the CHMP was of the view that occasional monitoring of ciclosporin blood levels were also relevant in these indications.
The CHMP was of the view that specification(essential or according to updated definition- primary) and the grade(mild or moderate) of the hypertension should be omitted.
Considering the particle size andthe particle size ranges range discussed above, the CHMP was of the view that Nanotop is comparable to Nanocoll- the product referred to in the submitted literature, and that therefore an impact on clinical efficacy is not expected.
The CHMP was of the view that renovascular hypertension should not be included as an independent indication, as the MAH was unable to substantiate it with their own clinical data.
Considering these clarifications andthe absence of data showing a clinical effect in treatment setting, the CHMP was of the view that the treatment indication does not appropriately reflect the intended use of the products and any reference to a treatment effect should be deleted.
However the CHMP was of the view that regardless of whether OR or RR are used,the signal is apparent, which can even be partly assessed by even looking at crude rates.
However, since the studies in the original Sandimmun dossier are old andthe posology based on those data is therefore obsolete in comparison with the different transplantation regimens used today, the CHMP was of the view that the dosage should also be guided by monitoring of ciclosporin blood levels.
Considering the submitted data, the CHMP was of the view that ceftriaxone is useful in the treatment of syphilis.
Therefore the CHMP was of the view that digitalis should not necessarily be mentioned because concomitant therapy with digitalis in general use(as a basic therapy)is not recommended today.
In view of the safety concerns the CHMP was of the view that it was necessary to restrict the target population for this indication.
The CHMP was of the view that Cmin is considered to be an important rate parameter especially in multiple dose bioequivalence studies, and that demonstration of bioequivalence is of paramount importance.
As agreed with the MAH, the CHMP was of the view that there is insufficient data to support the recommendation for subcutaneous administration of ceftriaxone.
The CHMP was of the view that the susceptibility of the organism to amoxicillin should be confirmed by laboratory results prior to initiating treatment with amoxicillin and requested that a warning to that effect be included in section 4.4(and cross referred in section 4.1).
In that respect, the CHMP was of the view that the indication in“Parkinson's disease and drug-induced Parkinsonism with special consideration to neurodyslectic syndrome” should be removed as this is an indication for chronic use.
In addition, the CHMP was of the view that the package size should be restricted according to the new treatment-days scheme recommended(up to 30 tablets or capsules/4 mg pack, up to 14 tablets or capsules/8 mg pack and up to 10 vials/ampoules).
In that respect, the CHMP was of the view that the indication in“Parkinson's disease and druginduced Parkinsonism with special consideration to neurodyslectic syndrome” should be removed as this is a chronic condition which requires longer treatment duration.
The CHMP was of the view that it should be mentioned that the angiotensin escape phenomenon(renin-angiotensin system activation and increased activity in sympathetic system) can occur(and was observed) in patients treated with ACE inhibitors as monotherapy Roig e, et al Eur.
The CHMP was of the view that the prescriber needs to be made aware that only symptomatic benefit has been demonstrated in clinical trials with cilazapril in heart failure and that no morbidity/mortality results are available, since outcome studies with cilazapril in chronic heart failure have not been performed.
The CHMP was of the view that clinical data generated over 6 to 12 months to further elucidate the level of asthma control and to further assess exacerbation rates seen with Iffeza compared with fluticasone propionate administered concomitantly with formoterol fumarate or administered alone, are not required.
However, the CHMP was of the view that PK and PD studies in healthy volunteers representing the broad range of phenotypes, or imaging studies in healthy volunteers to understand the influence of different factors on distribution, exposure and activity of adrenaline when administered via an adrenaline auto-injector device could be considered.
The CHMP was of the view that the risk of lactic acidosis can be minimised in patients with moderate renal impairment with clear dosing recommendations, additional monitoring of GFR levels before and during treatment and updated warnings and precautions in the Summary of Product Characteristics(SmPC) and Package Leaflet(PL).
The CHMP was of the view that written informed consent in the EU is associated with products where there are established serious risks and that the introduction of a request for informed consent for Implanon, one of several widely used methods of contraception, is unjustified and would strongly signal a risk that is certainly not present.
The CHMP is of the view that the indication should be limited to primary glomerulonephritis cases as specified above.
In conclusion, the CHMP is of the view that the data submitted by the MAHs are not suitable to support the positive benefit-risk balance of the medicinal product.
The CHMP is of the view that the reported systemic exposure aggravates the earlier concern about the potential genotoxicity of the products.
The CHMP is of the view that this argument does not substitute the need to establish bioequivalence with an EU reference medicinal product in order to conclude on the positive benefitrisk balance of the concerned medicinal products.