Примери за използване на Users concerned на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
What are users concerned about?
The use of such devices should be allowed only for legitimate purposes, with the knowledge of the users concerned.'.
(4) The collecting society shall inform the users concerned of the criteria used for the setting of the tariffs.
(9) Normally the employees to whom the telephone anddata traffic can be imputed as well as recipients and other users concerned.
Providers of online intermediation services shall notify to the business users concerned any envisaged modification of their terms and conditions.
It prohibits listening, tapping, storage or other kinds of interception orsurveillance of communications without the consent of the users concerned.
Providers of online intermediation services shall notify, on a durable medium, to the business users concerned any proposed changes of their terms and conditions.
The Directive prohibits listening, tapping, storage or other kinds of interception orsurveillance of communications by others than users, without the consent of the users concerned.
Providers of online intermediation services shall notify on a durable medium to the business users concerned any modification of their terms and conditions.
In a growing number of users concerned about the quality of life, concerned about the safety, healthy eating today, EC2COOK became the original cuisine platform, leading the new fashion majority of users. .
However, service providers may process these data for marketing purposes for as long as the users concerned give their consent.
(8) The Member States, providers and users concerned, together with the competent Community bodies, should cooperate in introducing and developing the relevant technologies where this is necessary to apply the guarantees provided for by this Directive and taking particular account of the objectives of minimising the processing of personal data and of using anonymous or pseudonymous data where possible.
Providers of online intermediation services shalland providers of operating system shall actively notify to the business users concerned any envisaged modification of their terms and conditions.
As regards the exception relating to unauthorised use of the electronic communications system, this appears to concern use which calls into question the actual integrity or security of the system, such as the cases referred to in Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/58 of the interception orsurveillance of communications without the consent of the users concerned.
Terms and conditions, or specific provisions thereof, which do not comply with the requirements of paragraph 1 shall not be binding on the business users concerned where such non-compliance is established by a competent court.
Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/58 provides that Member States must ensure the confidentiality of communications by means of a public communications network and publicly available electronic communications services, and of the related traffic data, and must inter alia prohibit, in principle, the storage of that data bypersons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned.
Listening, tapping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of communications and the related traffic data by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned, shall be prohibited, except when legally authorised to do so in accordance with Article 15(1).
Providers of online intermediation services shall without delay notify in a durable medium to the business users concerned any material modification of their terms and conditions or to the functionality, interoperability or other main performance features of the platform such as its accessibility, continuity and security, that adversely impacts the business user or affects them in a non-negligible manner.
That notice period shall be at least 15 days from the date on which the provider of online intermediation services notifies the business users concerned about the proposed changes.
Providers of online intermediation services may only identify mediators providing their mediation services from a location outside the Union where it is ensured that the business users concerned are not effectively deprived of the benefit of any legal safeguards laid down in Union law or the law of the Member States as a consequence of the mediators providing those services from outside the Union.
That notice period shall be at least 15 days andnot more than 30 days from the date on which the provider of online intermediation services notifies the business users concerned about the envisaged modifications.
Providers of online intermediation services may onlynot identify mediators providing their mediation services from a location outside the Union where it is ensured that the business users concerned are not effectively deprived of the benefit of any legal safeguards laid down in Union law or the law of the Member States as a consequence of the mediators providing those services from outside the Union.
Similarly to the findings of the Court in that judgment, the interference thus identified is wide-ranging andmust be considered to be particularly serious, given the large number of users concerned and the quantities of data transferred.
In particular, they shall prohibit listening, tapping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of communications, by others than users, without the consent of the users concerned, except when legally authorised, in accordance with Article 14(1).
Any attempt to reach an agreement through the internal complaint-handling system in accordance with this article shall not affect the rights of the providers of the online intermediation services and of the business users concerned to initiate judicial proceedings at any time during or after the process.
The EU Directive on privacy andelectronic communications requires EU Member States to ensure confidentiality of the communications by prohibiting unlawful interception and surveillance unless the users concerned have given their consent(Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC).
Any attempt to reach an agreement through mediation on the settlement of a dispute in accordance with this Article shall not affect the rights of the providers of the online intermediation services and of the business users concerned to initiate judicial proceedings at any time during or after the mediation process.
Background The EU Directive on privacy and electronic communications requires EU Member States to ensure confidentiality of the communications andrelated traffic data by prohibiting unlawful interception and surveillance unless the users concerned have consented to this(Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC).
In particular, they shall prohibit listening, tapping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of communications and the related traffic data by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned, except when legally authorised to do so in accordance with Article 15(1).
It also emerges from the observations made by the parties to the main proceedings and reproduced in the order for reference that, where they are unable to surrender the requisite number of electricity certificates by the due date,the electricity suppliers and users concerned are required to pay a sum of money.