Примери за използване на Were not statistically significant на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Differences were not statistically significant.
Improvements were seen in bone density in the hip as well, but they were not statistically significant.
The differences were not statistically significant.
One colonic adenoma andone caecal adenocarcinoma recorded in rats at the dose of 1,500 mg/kg/day were not statistically significant.
These improvements were not statistically significant.
Differences in AUC for the total active moiety between treatment with risperidone alone andcombination treatment with topiramate were not statistically significant.
Those increases were not statistically significant, the researchers pointed out.
The changes in HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels were not statistically significant in any group.
DFS data were not statistically significant but were still associated with a positive trend in favour of TAC.
In addition positive effects were observed on the voiding profile,although the observed differences were not statistically significant.
The differences in TSS and JSN were not statistically significant between methotrexate and LIFMIOR 25 mg.
It is important to mention that"income per household member" was also tested as a dependent variable,but the results were not statistically significant and sustainable.
The differences in TSS and JSN were not statistically significant between methotrexate and Enbrel 25 mg.
Increased levels of amylase, total bilirubin, and leukocytes, but decreased levels of thrombocytes and erythrocytes were observed,however differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant.
Illness duration and severity were not statistically significant with echinacea compared with placebo," said the researchers from the University of Wisconsin in the study.
More importantly, the Applicant reproduced the statistically significant product effect for thesingle dose study(p= 0.0371), whereas for the multiple dose study the differences were not statistically significant(p=0.0716).
Although these changes were not statistically significant, the results showed positive changes to balance, pain and quality of life and a high level of interest through attendance amongst older participants.
Although small changes in the pharmacokinetics of daptomycin and tobramycin were observed during coadministration by intravenous infusion over a 30-minute period using a Cubicin dose of 2 mg/kg,the changes were not statistically significant.
The differences between the two groups, 125 mg twice daily and250 mg twice daily, were not statistically significant but there was a trend towards improved exercise capacity in the group treated with 250 mg twice daily.
For MCS, the mean change from baseline to week 52 for both RoActemra weekly and every other weekly dose groups[7.28, 6.12, respectively]were higher than the placebo plus 52 weeks prednisone taper group[2.84](although the differences were not statistically significant[weekly p=0.0252 for weekly, p=0.1468 for every other weekly]) and similar to the placebo plus 26 weeks prednisone taper group[6.67].
The differences in daily failure rates from Day 5 to Day 18 between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant at any of these days nor was the overall difference in cumulative failure rates from Day 5 to Day 18(29.9% vs. 23.6%; p= 0.3682).
The difference between the groups was not statistically significant, researchers said.
The difference was not statistically significant, meaning it could have occurred by chance.
The effects of industry are not statistically significant until the 1980s.
This difference was not statistically significant.
This result was not statistically significant, said the researchers.
This incidence was not statistically significant when adjusted for survival.
This was not statistically significant(p= 0.96).
That difference also was not statistically significant, according to the investigators.
The difference was not statistically significant, the researchers noted.