Примери коришћења Commissioner's decisions на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
It sounds good, but when Swedish law states that the Commissioner's decisions shall be final and enforceable- it is adhered to.
Mr. Sabic also pointed to the rising number of complaints filed by the government authorities against the Commissioner's decisions.
Regarding the enforcement of the Commissioner's decisions, the Law stipulates that, when necessary, they shall be enforced by the Government.
However, the operation of the mechanism of responsibility is still far below the necessary level.The second mechanism concerns the enforcement of Commissioner's decisions.
Although the Commissioner's decisions are binding by the law, no mechanism for their enforcement has been available to him so far.
In the same period, the Government, even thoughit was obliged to ensure the forced fulfillment of the Commissioner's decisions, failed to do so, not even once.
Why?- According to the law, The Commissioner's decisions are legally binding for all government bodies and, if necessary, Serbian Government should ensure that the decisions are administered.
Sabic especially glimpsed on the lack of readiness of the Government to implement, when it is necessary,its legal obligation to provide for execution of the Commissioner's Decisions.
By law the Commissioner's decisions are binding, one cannot file a complaint against them, and their revision is possible in special cases, under conditions prescribed by law, only before the Supreme Court.
And some unique basis of the policy system for compensations and criteria are determined by the Assembly, based on law. S:You've asked the Government to secure implementation and execution of the Commissioner's decisions.
It is a pleasant surprise that the level of discipline when it comes to carrying out the Commissioner's decisions is quite high and I must say that nearly 98 per cent of them are carried out without any problems.
That is very worrying which is why I, at the beginning of this year, submitted an initiative to the Government aimed at passing adequate bylaws ora different regulation which would be the basis for the fulfillment of Government obligations related to the execution of the Commissioner's decisions.
Sabic and Cvetkovic agreed that the Government will ensure better conditions for the forcible enforcement of the Commissioner's decisions and take concrete steps to enforce the decisions that have remained unenforced so far.
Sabic says that we currently have 195 Commissioner's decisions that haven't been executed and that since the beginning of application of the Law in 2005, until May this year, 132 decisions haven't been executed, and that lately that number has a constant growth.
The potential of the law has been confirmed, but I do think that it is not used as much as we would like it to be. Although it was asked over thirty times to administer the Commissioner's decisions but the Serbian Government failed to act on a single request.
Law on Free Access to Information of Public importance, where if required,implementation of Commissioner's decisions is ensured by the Government of Serbia. So far, luckily, such need did not incur too often, because there is relatively small number of cases where authorities did not act according to Commissioner's decision. .
At that meeting, they agreed that the Government would pass, without delay a special bylaw or conclusion, as well as a proposal for amendments to the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance, so as toensure better prerequisites for the enforcement of the Commissioner's decisions.
And it has been even longer that the Government has not been looking back at the requests to ensure the execution of the commissioner's decisions, in accordance with the law, and to activate the accountability mechanisms for the violation of the Law on Free Access to Information.
Believe it or not, unpermitted charges have been submitted even by the Republic Prosecutor's Office and Republic Public Attorney Office. S: Does that mean that the Government wants to hide some data from your office? R. Š: The Government is legally obliged to,in the case of need, secure execution of the Commissioner's decisions, and it still fails to do so.
The same applies to the activation of monitoring mechanisms,introduction of infringement liability and enforcement of the Commissioner's decisions. If these elementary assumptions are not ensured, all achievements made so far in the implementation of the Law will be cancelled.".
Expired Sunday, 18 January 2009 18:26 In some instances, public authorities invoke the provisions of the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance to deny free access to information even after the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance has passed a decision to that effect. These authorities justify their actions by stating that they have filed complaints to the Supreme Court of Serbia against the Commissioner's decisions.
The same applies to the activation of monitoring mechanisms,introduction of infringement liability and enforcement of the Commissioner's decisions. If these elementary assumptions are not ensured, all achievements made so far in the implementation of the Law will be cancelled.".
These mechanisms are in the hands of Government and have not at all, or at least not properly activated, which objectively encouraged the violation of law. With regard to that, the Government shall, without delay, by making special regulations or conclusions and proposals for amendments tothe Law on Free Access to Information, provide better prerequisites for forced execution of the Commissioner's decisions and take concrete steps to ensure so far unexecuted solutions.
By the way,I have appealed to the Government twice to create an efficient mechanism for the administration of The Commissioner's decisions, but my initiative was ignored. A couple of months ago you said that the authorities had failed to do their task with regard to the law application.
NewsIn 2017, the inappropriate attitude of the Serbian Government and other public authorities towards the public's right to know reached a climax, despite their obligation to promote the exercise of that right,said Serbian Commissioner for Information of Public Importance Rodoljub Sabic on the occasion of International Public's Right to Know Day. He said that Serbian Government failed to enforce Commissioner's decisions and disclose information of public importance, even though it is obliged to do so.
It is time to finally activate the responsibility mechanisms for breach of law and implementation of the Commissioner's Decisions. According to the proclaimed principles of work transparency, as well as of e-government, the authorities should make available as many data as possible, also by public presentment of available databases and through Internet.
By proposing these amendments, the Government actually confirms it respects our agreement",said Rodoljub Sabic, Commissioner for Information of Public Importance. Although the Commissioner's decisions are binding by the law, no mechanism for their enforcement was available to him.
The greatest result in the application of our Law is the presence andthe strengthening of this trend. Why is the number of complaints filed against the Commissioner's decisions increasing? More complaints have been filed to the Supreme Court against the Commissioner's decisions by the state authorities than by the citizens whose complaints the Commissioner refused to address.
Sabic: I didnt' criticize it that it didn't cooperate with me, I only spoke that they do not do the things they are legally bound to do. For instance,Article 28 writes that the execution of the Commissioner's decisions should be provided by the Government, and in another Article writes that the Ministry of Culture is in charge of law implementation, and also for starting the infringement proceedings.
Expired Sunday, 18 January 2009 18:24 Commissioner for the information of public importance reiterated initiative of the Government of Serbia to establish mechanism for carrying out Commissioner's decisions. Initiative for amending Rules of Procedure of the Government or possible adoption of the special regulation was addressed to the Government by the Commissioner several months ago, in March this year.