Примери коришћења Election conditions на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
It wouldn't be right to say that the EU is not advocating for better election conditions.
Asked about election conditions, he said he thought they hadn't been fair for more than 25 years.
We did our best really to meet all their demands,all demands of the European Union to deliver on it, on election conditions.
The organization's representatives said that election conditions in Serbia need to improve, especially regarding the equal representation of electoral lists in the media.
We did our best really to meet all their demands,all demands of the European Union to deliver on it, on election conditions.
Problems with establishing fair and fair election conditions were also pointed out by Tanja Fajon during a recent session of the Parliamentary Committee on Stabilization and Association in Belgrade.
He said that he would propose that his party no longer take part in the talks on election conditions and boycott future elections. .
According to her, improving the election conditions is not an empty promise, but that there are 17 recommendations from the dialogue that are yet to be implemented and that more than 70 percent of earlier recommendations have been fully implemented.
PM Brnabic thanked the EP Representatives on engagement this institution showed in facilitating the Election conditions dialogue, adding that this kind of support is very important.
According to her, improving the election conditions is not an empty promise, but that there are 17 recommendations from the dialogue that are yet to be implemented and that more than 70 percent of earlier recommendations have been fully implemented.
PM Brnabic thanked the EP Representatives on engagement this institution showed in facilitating the Election conditions dialogue, adding that this kind of support is very important.
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic announced last night that Prime Minister Ana Brnabic would invite the Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights(ODIHR)from the OSCE to come to Serbia and to check the election conditions.
Not even the possible arrival of monitoring missions from OSCE andODIHR would not crucially change election conditions in Serbia, even the part of the opposition not supporting the boycott believed, especially if their mission was not complete.
One of the leaders of the Alliance for Serbia and People's Party President Vuk Jeremić reiterated that the bloc remained consistent in its decision not to take part in the election next spring,adding that fair election conditions had to last nine months.
He estimated that the election conditions are better today than in 2012 when the SNS won, adding that he"could not even dream" of the media space that the opposition now has, and that they rarely appear on the Public Service, except in mandatory terms.
Veselinovic reminded that, in the opposition's requests,the authorities were left a deadline of six to nine months prior to the elections for creating election conditions and concluded that very little time was left for this to be done.
During the dialogue on election conditions, Transparency Serbia proposed numerous amendments that would enable more efficient control(e. g. criteria for determining„non-market benefits“), as well as more precise definition of the Criminal Act from the article 38. para.
Veselinovic reminded that, in the opposition's requests,the authorities were left a deadline of six to nine months prior to the elections for creating election conditions and concluded that very little time was left for this to be done.
The set of measures that the government is introducing to improve election conditions was termed meaningless by the United Democratic Party, adding that this is a way to buy time before elections are called"since the ruling party is showing its understanding of elections every day in local communities”.
They assessed that it was now clear to everyone that Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic had misled EP representatives who had participated in the dialogue on election conditions in Serbia, and that the authorities failed to deliver on what they had promised.
Upcoming elections and the dialogue on election conditions in Serbia, the work of the Serbian Parliament and the freedom of media were discussed by coalition prEUgovor representatives with members of EU administration covering enlargement, Western Balkans and Serbia, as well as think-tanks and media in Brussels, on October 2-4, 2019.
They assessed that it is now clear to everyone that Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic had deceived the EP representatives who participated in the dialogue about the election conditions in Serbia, and that the authorities had fulfilled none of what they had promised.
They warned that there is little time left to improve election conditions by implementing all obligations before the election campaign starts and suggested a review of the election time frame with full respect for the constitution and laws to allow the implementation of obligations and restore trust in the election framework.
They assessed that it is now clear to everyone that Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic had deceived the EP representatives who participated in the dialogue about the election conditions in Serbia, and that the authorities had fulfilled none of what they had promised.
Transparency Serbia, during the dialogue on election conditions pointed out to potential beneficial consequences of establishing of working group on the level of Government, that would make sense only if it would encourage the work of all others on improvement of regulations based on ODIHR recommendations, so that all the reforms could make an effect before the beginning of the campaign for next elections. .
They assessed that it is now clear to everyone that Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic had deceived the EP representatives who participated in the dialogue about the election conditions in Serbia, and that the authorities had fulfilled none of what they had promised.
BRUSSELS- European Parliament is ready to mediate the dialogue between government andthe opposition in Serbia over the election conditions, if it receives a positive answer from the Speaker of the Assembly Maja Gojković, stated David McAllister, Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament.
President underlined that an exceptional work and enormous efforts are necessary in order to resolve the Kosovo issue,while part of the public in Serbia imposes as the only important issue election conditions in Serbia, although the elections will take place in eight months.
In the context of the new composition of European Parliament and European Commission,engagement of the European Parliament in mediating the dialogue on election conditions in Serbia, as well as introduction of new EU mechanisms for strengthening the Rule of Law in Member States, in the new Alarm report prEUgovor Coalition analyses effects of the reforms in the Rule of law in Serbia in the period from April to September 2019.
The leader of the opposition Party of Freedom and Justice(SAA) Dragan Djilas informed Milan Antonijevic and the Open Society Foundation,organizers of the roundtable on election conditions, that he, personally, and the SAA, would not participate in future meetings unless they are open to the public.