Примери коришћења Employment ban на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
It was not an arrest, but an employment ban!
However, the employment ban was a forced and, in the long-term, harmful measure, which should not have been extended for so long.
In addition to the disordered salary system,the public sector is additionally disrupted by the maintenance of the employment ban.
Part-time work for fathers can begin at the earliest after the mother's employment ban and must be for a minimum of three months.
Continuing the employment ban in general government is very dangerous and a controlled exit from this measure should begin in 2019.
These positions, which the government itself deems necessary,cannot be filled for as long as the employment ban stands.
Employment ban in the general government was introduced as a temporary measure in December 2013, with the original expiration date until the end of 2015.
Although it was envisaged to last until the end of 2015, employment ban remained in force by the end of 2018 and is likely to be extended into 2019.
In short, employment ban in the general government was introduced as a temporary measure in December 2013, with the expiration date at the end of 2015.
The Fiscal Strategy for 2020 announces the end of the employment ban and transition to a new, more flexible method of employment control.
The most prominent weakness of this budget's is the fact that it preserves the temporary fiscal consolidation measures- decrease of above-average pensions and employment ban.
O Extension of the general government employment ban in 2019 is very dangerous and the Fiscal Council has already written about this in detail several times.
The Government has no concrete plan as to when it intends to shift to a sustainable general government employment management model andfinally revoke the harmful employment ban.
The Minister of Education, Mladen Sarcevic has also said that the employment ban in education was a mistake, because teachers were unjustifiably classified in administration.
Even though unsuccessful general government downsizing,certain savings have been achieved nevertheless, due to natural outflow of the retiring employees combined with the employment ban.
Termination of the employment ban in the public sector was necessary and inevitable, but this measure alone will not resolve the issue of poor employment structure in the general government.
However, since the Government has still not done this,employment control in 2019 will be implemented through the general employment ban(using the Committee for New Employment Approval for the most critical cases).
The mere repeal of employment ban is insufficient for a sustainable and good managing the number of employees in the general government; it needs to be used to rectify the current major issues.
The Government has not been able to preparethe appropriate job catalogue, without which the termination of the temporary employment ban would lead into unjustified and exaggerated increase in employment in the general government.
The second measure, abolition of the employment ban, was necessary as it was the prolonged duration of the ban that has led to serious shortages of staff in important parts of the public sector.
As a matter of fact, in the meantime, the system has collapsed additionally due to ad hoc increase of salaries in individual sectors(which have been implemented since 2016)and extension of the employment ban(which should have been lifted back in 2015).
Fourth, in 2019, the employment ban needs to be lifted in a controlled manner, as there is already a serious shortage of employees in key segments of the general government(healthcare, inspections etc.).
The plan and program of the operation of the institution includes the recruitment of the necessary professional staff andthe report was adopted by the local assembly, but as the employment ban is still in place we are not able to announce calls for application.
The Government's decision to abandon the employment ban model was necessary and, in a way, forced, since we are now in the sixth year of its implementation although only two years were originally planned.
These systems were still maintained in the unsustainable, crisis-management regimes for the large part of 2018(the temporary pension andpublic sector salary cuts and employment ban were in force)- which now need to be left behind, moving into a system that will be sustainable in the long-term.
After repealing the employment ban, the system needs to be brought to a sustainable state as soon as possible- where human resources management should again rest on its basic instruments- job systematizations 4 and human resource plans of individual government institutions.
An even greater fiscal danger lies in the easily imaginable uncontrolled growth of the number of employees once the employment ban is lifted(which has already happened in the past)- as there is no analysis available to permanently define the necessary job positions by sectors.
General government employment ban had been introduced back in December 2013 as an interim measure, with the original validity term by the end of 2015; however, each following year, the ban was extended, ending with 2019- and perhaps it will remain in force in the upcoming years as well.
The Draft Strategy now envisages two main measures for the regulation of the salary and employment system in the general government: 1 introduction of pay grades that, after another postponement, has now been announced for mid-2020 and2 termination of the employment ban from the second half of 2019.
Namely, both the productive andthe non-productive employees retire and the prolonged employment ban through 2017 would already become a threat for the functioning of certain important segments of general government(education, healthcare etc).