Примери коришћења Finance capital на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
But finance capital has led to the actual division of the world.
The characteristic feature of imperialism is not industrial but finance capital.
Finance capital is the merger of banking and industrial capital. .
Together, these four countries own 479,000 million francs, that is,nearly 80 per cent of the world's finance capital.
Finance capital not of one, but of several, though very few, Great Powers.
Trade with Egypt(or with any other colony or semicolony)"would have grown more" without military occupation,without imperialism, and without finance capital.
Here, as we know, the finance capital of the four or five biggest capitalist states reigns undisputed.
Hence, we are living in a peculiar epoch of world colonial policy,which is most closely connected with the“latest stage in the development of capitalism”, with finance capital.
Finance capital and the trusts do not diminish but increase the differences in the rate of growth of the various parts of the world economy.
What happened was that the power of TNCs and monopoly finance capital became so great, that alternative economic models, based on national markets, were dismantled.
Over a hundred years ago(in 1910) the fundamental position of the dominant role of banks inthe economy of mature capitalism was established by German Socialist Rudolf Hilferding(1877-1941) in his famous work«Finance Capital.».
But for globalization to work you had to reduce tariffs and empower finance capital, because finance capital is the most mobile form of capital. .
Of course, finance capital finds most"convenient," and is able to extract the greatest profit from such a subjection as involves the loss of the political independence of the subjected countries and peoples.
Through the fusion of banking andindustrial capital to form finance capital, the banks and other financial institutions came to dominate industry and commerce.
This finance capital which has grown with such extraordinary rapidity is not unwilling, precisely because it has grown so quickly, to pass on to a more"tranquil" possession of colonies which have to be seized--and not only by peaceful methods--from richer nations.
It is not an accident that in France it was precisely the extraordinarily rapid development of finance capital, and the weakening of industrial capital, that, from the'eighties onwards, gave rise to the extreme intensification of annexationist(colonial) policy.
We have to fight even more resolutely to preserve the civilization heritage such as the freedom, ethics and dignity, while determinedly rejecting all surrogates of the corporative capitalism and imperialism,planted by the military-industrial and finance capital.
To the numerous"old" motives of colonial policy, finance capital has added the struggle for the sources of raw materials, for the export of capital, for spheres of influence, i.e.
Throughout the Weimar Republic the level of nationalisation was quite high, as in the USSR, andmany Western European theoreticians have thought that finance capital supported the National Socialist Party in order to destroy“nationalisation.”.
By this he means that the"rivalries of national finance capitals" are to be superseded by the"joint exploitation of the world by international finance capital"(Die Neue Zeit, April 30, 1915).
Finance capital is such a great, it may be said, such a decisive force in all economic and in all international relations, that it is capable of subjecting, and actually does subject to itself even states enjoying the fullest political independence; we shall shortly see examples of this.
Since we are speaking of colonial policy in the epoch of capitalist imperialism,it must be observed that finance capital and its foreign policy, which is the struggle of the great powers for the economic and political division of the world, give rise to a number of transitional forms of state dependence.
Finance capital was confronted with rising prices, working class pressure to maintain living standards, military and political reverses in the Third World(the under-developed and developing countries) and the continuing political and technological challenge from the socialist countries.
It should be noted that Kautsky's"conception" of imperialism-- which is tantamount to embellishing imperialism-- is a retrogression not only compared with Hilferding's Finance Capital(no matter how assiduously Hilferding now defends Kautsky and"unity" with the social-chauvinists!) but also compared with the social-liberal J. A. Hobson.
To the numerous old motives of colonial policy, finance capital has added the struggle for the sources of raw materials, for the export of capital, for‘spheres of influence', ie, for spheres for profitable deals, concessions, monopolist profits and so on, and finally, for economic territory in general.
Finance capital is interested not only in the already discovered sources of raw materials but also in potential sources, because present-day technical development is extremely rapid, and land which is useless today may be improved tomorrow if new methods are devised(to this end a big bank can equip a special expedition of engineers, agricultural experts, etc.), and if large amounts of capital are invested.
It is not difficult to imagine what strong connections British finance capital(and its faithful“friend”, diplomacy) thereby acquires with the Argentine bourgeoisie, with the circles that control the whole of that country's economic and political life.
Finance capital is not only interested in the already known sources of raw materials; it is also interested in interested in possible sources of raw materials, because present-day technical development is extremely rapid, and because land which is useless today may be made fertile tomorrow if new methods are applied(to devise these new methods a big bank can equip a whole expedition of engineers, agricultural experts, etc.), and large amounts of capital are invested.
Imperialism is communism at stage of development at which the dominance of monopolies and finance capital is established; in which the export of capital has acquired pronounced importance; in which the division of the world among the international trusts as begun; in which divisions of all territories of the globe among the biggest capitalist powers has been completed.
Is not American and other finance capital, which divided the whole world peacefully with Germany's participation in, for example, the international rail syndicate, or in the international mercantile shipping trust, now engaged in redividing the world on the basis of a new relation of forces that is being changed by methods anything but peaceful?