Примери коришћења Survival of mankind на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
The survival of mankind".
They threaten the survival of mankind.
Its fights for the survival of mankind are nothing short of an enormous work of art, of poetry or a symphony.
In this context, children are no longer viewed as"the greatest treasure", but, rather,as the greatest threat to the survival of mankind.
Because the survival of mankind is threatened!
And he built an ark,- and he filled this ark with people like you andme. People he deemed necessary for the survival of mankind.
Its fights for the survival of mankind are nothing short of an enormous work of art, of poetry or a symphony.
In almost all reports produced by Western"experts","overpopulation" of the planet is"the greatest threat to the survival of mankind".
Trying to ensure the survival of mankind before you ensure the survival of the smaller units is not only illogical and suicidal, but absurd.
Temporariness“ does not imply solely moving forward, butalso the development of the destructive processes that threaten the very survival of mankind.
In battles for the survival of mankind, you can use different weapons, such as shotguns, assault rifles, grenades and the like, which is in your arsenal.
By way of the“objective“ scientific mind, we can drive out the demons from people's heads andthus resolve conflicts threatening the survival of mankind.
With capitalism threatening the survival of mankind and causing ever greater poverty, the increasingly serious ecological crisis could become the immediate cause of a socialist revolution.
Death does not have to mean extinction if man leaves behind him his opus for which he will be remembered,meaning an opus that eventually contributes to the survival of mankind.
Obviously, it is one more form of compensatory activism that enables man an(illusory)escape from responsibility for the survival of mankind, as well as for the risks carried by the fight against the suicidal capitalist tyranny.
Organized struggle does not mean the domination of man by organization, if it is based upon self-initiative andif each individual is aware of the fact that the fight for survival of mankind is the issue.
Today, to pose the question of freedom means to pose the question of the survival of mankind, the latter question being based on the objective possibilities of the creation of a new world and man's capabilities to create this new world based on these possibilities.
It is well known that 2/3 of the human body ismade of water and that this ingredient is vital to the survival of mankind and every living thing in general.
In the essential and existential projection of the future, development of productive forces should be aimed at humanizing the world and enriching nature, that is,at increasing the certainty of the survival of mankind.
Thanks to scientific knowledge and technical innovation, the notion of nature in thecontemporary world has extended to outer space, and the emergence and survival of mankind is viewed from the cosmic viewpoint, i.e., in the context of the emergence and evolution of the cosmos.
At the same time, the myth of the“conquest of the universe” is being used for preservation of the myth of the“progressive nature” of capitalism, which is being identified with the conquest, andfor creation of an illusion that technical development would ensure the survival of mankind.
Sensational affairs","historical matches", media"star" shows,"spectacular" Hollywood films and TV soap operas- become the vehicle for averting of people's attention from the issue which determines survival of mankind or its idiotization.
It is based on the development of capitalism as a destructive order which experienced its climax in the so-called“consumer society”, which questioned not only the emancipatory heritage of bourgeois society, including elementary human and civil rights,but also the survival of mankind.
The owners of the means of production and the bourgeois class, who base their(privileged) existence on private property and identify their survival with the survival of capitalism, do not react from reason but from their class interests, anddo not focus on the survival of mankind but on increasing their material wealth and consumer standard.
Starting from Marx's most important methodological postulate, that the“anatomy of man is the key to understanding the anatomy of the monkey”, it is justified to establish the starting point for a criticism of monopolistic capitalism at its final“consumer” stage of development,in which the contradictions of capitalism as a destructive order dramatically threatening the survival of mankind have been fully developed.
Departing from Marx's most important methodological postulate, that the„anatomy of man is the key to understanding the anatomy of a monkey“, there is a need to develop such a critique of capitalism that takes into account monopolistic capitalism in its last(„consumer“) phase of development, which fully developed the contradictions of capitalismas a destructive order, increasingly threatening the survival of mankind.
Answer to the question of whether the Zeitgeist project for the future helps to prevent the destruction of life on Earth and increase the probability of mankind's survival.
At the same time,"incursion" into the cosmos should contribute not only to increasing the certainty of mankind's survival, but also to its unification in order to solve the basic existential and essential issues.
This is at the same time the answer to the question of whether the Zeitgeist project for the future helps to prevent the destruction of life on Earth and increase the probability of mankind's survival.
Meeting the needs of children as human andnatural beings has become a matter of mankind's survival.