Esimerkkejä Majority of delegations käytöstä Englanti ja niiden käännökset Suomi
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
A majority of delegations could agree on the following points.
With regard to the level of support, the majority of delegations found the rates proposed by the Commission appropriate.
A majority of delegations favoured the idea of a control mechanism.
Although this was not included in the initial Commission's proposal, the majority of delegations have considered positively the possibility of making the ECCP a"national programme" for the Community.
A majority of delegations supported the presidency compromise on cabotage.
Ihmiset myös kääntävät
All delegations support the objectives of the proposal, however a majority of delegations are reluctant to apply the comitology procedure to all actions as suggested in the Commission's proposal.
A majority of delegations emphasised that this regime should be maintained without any time limit.
The text agreed by the Council does not retain the Commission's proposal to incorporate a microchip with driver card functionalities into the driving licence for professional drivers, since the majority of delegations have doubts as to whether the benefits of such a merger would justify the costs it entails.
The majority of delegations supported the general thrust of the EIPs.
The Council is requested to act only when a majority of delegations in the management committee has been unable to give an opinion on such a proposal.
A majority of delegations was in favour of including long term limits in the proposal.
On control and enforcement, a majority of delegations could accept a catalogue of sanctions in Community legislation.
A majority of delegations recognised the interrelationship between this proposal and the proposed Regulation on sales promotions.
Regarding the first question which concerned the type of passenger services, a majority of delegations considered that the scope of the proposed regulation should include all types of services with the exception of tourist and sightseeing services.
A majority of delegations favoured the concept of prohibition, to ensure monetary penalties related to pollution offences, as was already the case in several Member States.
After a brief exchange of views on this last point the majority of delegations were opposed to the Commission proposal in that it did not result in actual taxation in the country of consumption.
The majority of delegations and the Commission expressed their readiness to come to an agreement on the package before the Helsinki European Council.
Summing up the debate, the President noted that a majority of delegations were agreed that the main objective of both proposed Directives should be the security of energy supply.
The majority of delegations also supported reinforcing the open method of coordination for social protection and social inclusion.
Following discussion of the outstanding issues, the majority of delegations, in a spirit of compromise, accepted the draft general approach as set out in the presidency's proposal(7537/12), subject to the following changes.
A majority of delegations insisted on the need to assess the socio-economic impact on producers and consumers prior to any modification of the existing minimum requirements;
As for the second question, on territorial application, a majority of delegations considered that the draft regulation should apply to passenger travelling between Community as well as to those travelling between Community and third country ports.
The majority of delegations considered that enhanced cooperation, as provided for in the EU treaty, is the only option for making progress on the creation of a unified EU patent system.
From the debate, it emerged that a majority of delegations attached great importance to this proposal and agreed that quick progress was needed towards the establishment of a new and updated Community-wide framework for infrastructure charging.
A majority of delegations felt that the proposed exceptions regarding liability must be subject to strict conditions to ensure the application of the"polluter pays" principle.
However, a majority of delegations were also open to the idea of adopting a Directive.
A majority of delegations considered that a precautionary approach might justify treating such mixtures as hazardous“amber” listed waste as proposed by the Commission.
Noted that a majority of delegations cannot accept the principle of obligatory co-financing by Member States;
A majority of delegations considered that the task of protection of the principle should be left to each member state when implementing the directive and applying it in individual cases.
The debate on this question showed that a majority of delegations agree that some form of financial security should be made mandatory so as to ensure, in practice, that funds are available to undertake the prevention or remedying action required to achieve the objective of better environmental protection.