Eksempler på brug af Applicant countries should på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
In light of enlargement, the applicant countries should also be allowed to participate in the contact meetings.
In our first report we included a fundamental point concerning the conditions which the Commission proposed applicant countries should fulfill in order to qualify for EU farming subsidies.
The applicant countries should also be allowed to keep their standards, especially when they are higher than ours.
Extending such joint surveillance exercises into the applicant countries should be an early objective.
The applicant countries should also give priority to border controls. They must build up an effective customs service and so on.
During the accession negotiations the applicant countries should be treated as full and equal partners.
The applicant countries should take full part in the Convention with full membership and have their fair share of the posts in the Praesidium and the Secretariat.
I believe that the Europe agreements on trade between the EU and applicant countries should be reviewed so that they do more to promote trade and enterprise around the Baltic.
The applicant countries should be allowed to decide on their own regarding the buying and selling of agricultural land and second houses, at least until their incomes are comparable to ours.
The European Union must take this element as a point of reference, but the applicant countries should also involve themselves in the Lisbon strategy by adopting its objectives as far as possible.
All the applicant countries should therefore have the right to initiate negotiations for accession to the Union at the same time and the negotiations should begin at the same time.
A special White Paper, published in 1995,listed the laws and regulations the applicant countries should enact in the economic policy sphere to prepare the ground for their future accession.
The applicant countries should have been offered more flexible conditions, including different types of association agreements with mutual influence and mutual obligations instead of the colonial style EEA-agreement.
It is important in the context of Estonia's future accession,on which negotiations began last year, that applicant countries should be able to cope with the market mechanisms as they apply in the Union.
It is equally important that the applicant countries should now be able to participate in the dialogue with a view to constructive cooperation on the labour market in these countries too.
I am disappointed that the proposal by the Committee on Legal Affairs andCitizens' Rights, that the Member States and the applicant countries should, as a first step, ratify the Convention of the Council of Europe, has not been reconsidered.
The applicant countries should give priority to acquiring well-functioning legal systems and preventing and fighting corruption and criminality, and we should contribute to this through our cooperation and economic help.
One of the requirements laid down in the pre-accession negotiations is that applicant countries should make the adjustments that are necessary to achieve the same level of safety as that obtaining in the Member States.
The applicant countries should be actively involved in the development and implementation of the programme and consideration should be given to a strategic approach to health in those countries, and especially to their specific problems.
In Agenda 2000, the Commission proposed that applicant countries should not receive any direct payments in the form of arable payments or animal premia after their accession.
Above all though, young people in the applicant countries should have the opportunity to take part in the new programme on an equal footing from the very beginning. It is certainly hard to understand why the Council- which extended such a warm invitation a few days ago in Helsinki- denied the young people of Europe the funding which we considered necessary in the Conciliation Committee.
To protect the financial interests of the Community, applicant countries should have similar obligations as Member States with regard to controls carried out by Community agents on the Sapard monies.
Waiting for agricultural reform and a fair deal, the applicant countries should be able to have the amounts provided for in the agricultural budgets as lump sums, instead of being bound to use the money in the silly, wasteful and inefficient way we have done.
We disagree with the rapporteur's view that pre-accession aid to the applicant countries should not be entered under a separate category and that it should be included in the guideline, in order to reduce the burden on the rest of the budget.
The Commission and each applicant country should therefore draw up a multiannual financing agreement in which the conditions determining the use of the Sapard contribution will be set out.
Should the applicant countries be divided into first and second class?
When exceptional natural disasters, including those involving fires,adversely affect forests in various applicant countries, it should be possible to support certain actions in favour of that sector.