Hvad er oversættelsen af " PROPOSED CONCENTRATION " på dansk?

• den planlagte fusion
• den påtænkte fusion
• den planlagte sammenslutning

Eksempler på brug af Proposed concentration på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk

The first phase is simply a preliminary examination of the proposed concentration.
Den første fase omfatter alene en forundersøgelse af den påtænkte fusion.

The proposed concentration would have brought together two companies with stable andlargely symmetrical market positions in the past.
Den planlagte fusion ville have bevirket, at to virksomhedermed stabile og hidtil stort set symmetriske markedsandele blev kombineret.

For the application of the two-thirds rale for undertakings, we give the following examples proposed concentration between undertakings A and B.
Til illustration af, hvordan2/3 reglen skal anvendes, gives følgende eksempler planlagt sammenslutning mellem virksomhed A og virksomhed B.

Describe how the proposed concentration is likely to affect the interests of intermediate andultimate consumers and the development of technical and economic progress.
Beskriv hvilke virkninger den planlagte fusion kan ventes at fi for aftagere i erhvervslivet og endelige forbrugere samt for den tekniske og økonomiske udvikling.

Following initial doubts, by Decision dated 19 July 2004 2(‘the first clearance decision') the Commission approved this proposed concentration.
Efter indledningsvis at have næret tvivl godkendte Kommissionen den påtænkte fusion ved beslutning af 19. juli 2004 2herefter»første godkendelsesbeslutning«.

For the calculation of turnover for insurance undertakings, we give the following example(proposed concentration between insurances A and B): I. Consolidated profit and loss account.
Til illustration af, hvordan forsikringsselskabers omsætning beregnes, gives følgende eksem pel planlagt sammenslutning mellem forsikringsselskab A og B.

We are in favour of the proposed concentration of funding for development and structural adjustment of underdeveloped regions(Objective 1), as proposed by the report and by the Commission.
Vi går ind for den i betænkningen og af Kommissionen foreslåede koncentration om fremme af udviklingen og den strukturelle tilpasning i de regioner, der har et udviklingsefterslæb mål 1.

Where antioxidants are included in the formulation, the effectiveness of the proposed concentration of the antioxidant should be justified and verified by appropriate studies.
Hvor antioxidanter er inkluderet i formuleringen, effektiviteten af den planlagte fusion af antioxidanten skal begrundes og verificeret af relevante undersøgelser.

Consequently, the proposed concentration will not have the effect, in all the local markets concerned, of significantly impeding effective competition in a substantial part of the common market.
Heraf følger, at for alle de berørte lokale markeder vil den planlagte fusion ikke bevirke, at den effektive konkur rence hæmmes betydeligt i en væsentlig del af fælles markedet.

In this case, each of the undertakings concerned achieves more than two-thirds of its Community-wide turnover in one(and the same) Member State X; the proposed concentration would not fall under the scope of the Regulation.
I dette tilfælde realiserer begge virksomheder over Vj af deres EF omsætning i et og samme land X, og den planlagte sammenslutning falder derfor ikke ind under forordningen.

On 19 May 1998 prior notice of the proposed concentration was published(Case No IV/M.1168- DHL/Deutsche Post) inviting third parties to submit their observations to the Commission.
Den 19. maj 1998 offentliggjorde Kommissionen en meddelelse om anmeldelsen af den planlagte fusion(sag IV/M.1168 DHL/Deutsche Post), hvori andre parter blev opfordret til at indgive deres eventuelle bemærkninger til Kommissionen.

Each of the undertakings concerned(undertaking A 50,1% and undertaking Β 60,5%) achieves less than two-thirds of its Community-wide turnover in one(and the same) Member State Y, the proposed concentration would fall under the scope of the Regulation.
begge de deltagende virksomheder realiserer mindre end to tredjeldele(A: 50,1%, B: 60,5%) af deres EF-omsætning i et og samme land Y, falder den planlagte sammenslutning ind under forordningen.

While assessing the proposed concentration between Rewe/Billa and Kesko/Tuko, the Commission also had to deal with the geographical definition of retail markets in food retailing anddaily consumer goods.
I sin vurdering af den anmeldte fusion mellem Rewe og Billa og mellem Kesko og Tuko måtte Kommissionen også tage stilling til definitionen af det geografisk relevante marked for detailhandel med fødevarer og dagligvarer.

In this case, the two-thirds rule would not apply due to the fact that undertakings A and Β achieve more than two thirds of their Communitywide turnover in different Member States X and Y. Therefore, the proposed concentration would fall under the scope of the Regu lation.
I dette tilfælde gælder2/i reglen ikke, fordi virksomhed A og virksomhed Β hver især realiserer over% af deres EF omsætning i forskellige lande, X og Y. Den planlagte sammenslutning falder derfor ind under forordningen.

Conclusion: In this case, although undertaking A achieves more than two-thirds of its Communitywide turnover in Member State X, the proposed concentration would fall under thescope of the Regulation due to the fact that undertaking B achieves!ess than two-thirds of its Communitywide turnover in Member State X.
Konklusion: 1 dene tilfælde gælder, at selv om virksomhed A realiserer mere end to tredjedels af sin EU omsætning i land X, falder den planlagte fusion alligevel ind under forordningen, fordi virksomhed Β har mindre end to tredjedels af sin EU omsætning i land X.

Conclusion: In this case, the two-thirds rule would not apply due to the fact that undertakings A and Bachieve more than two-thirds of their Communitywide turnover in different Member States X and Y. Therefore, the proposed concentration would fall under the scope of the Regulation.
Konklusion: I dette tilfælde gælder to tredjedels reglen ikke, fordi virksomhed A og virksomhed Β hver især realiserer over to tredjedels af deres EU omsætning i forskellige lande, X og Y. Den planlagte fusion falder derfor ind under forordningen.

By its second plea raised before the Court of First Instance, Impala claimed that, by not taking the view that the proposed concentration would create a collective dom-inant position on the market for recorded music, the Commission had infringed Article 253 EC and made a manifest error of assessment and an error of law.
Ved det andet anbringende for Retten, har Impala gjort gældende, at Kommissionen har tilsidesat artikel 253 EF og anlagt et åbenbart urigtigt skøn og begået en retlig fejl ved at fastslå, at den påtænkte fusion ikke vil skabe en kollektiv dominerende stilling på markedet for indspillet musik.

However, for the reasons outlined in the Commission's original decision and subsequently upheld by the Court(notably, the ªfailing firm defenceº, which Ð see above Ð had to be examined ªex tuncº) the proposed concentration would not be responsible for a deterioration in the competitive structure of the market.
Af de grunde, der blev anført i Kommissionens oprindelige beslutning og derefter stadfæstet af Domstolen(bl.a.»failing company«-argumentet. der som nævnt ovenfor måtte vurderes ex tune), ville den planlagte fusion imidlertid ikke viere årsagen lil forværringen af konkurrencestrukturerne på markedet.

The proposed concentration would havebrought together two companies with stable andlargely symmetrical market positions in the past. Besides leading to the creation of a company several times stronger than its closest competitor, theoperation would have eliminated competitionbetween two particularly close competitors.
Den planlagte fusion ville have bevirket, at to virksomheder med stabile og hidtil stort setsymmetriske markedsandele blev kombineret. Bortset fra, at fusionen ville føre til etablering afenvirksomhed, der ville blive flere gange større end sinnærmeste konkurrent, ville fusionen også have elimineret konkurrencen mellem to meget jævnbyrdigekonkurrenter.

A list and short description of the contents of all other analyses, reports, studies and surveys prepared by or for any of the notifying parties for the purpose of assessing or analysing the proposed concentration with respect to competitive conditions, competitors(actual and potential), and market conditions.
En liste over og en kort beskrivelse af indholdet af alle analyser, rapporter, undersøgelser og studier udarbejdet af eller for parterne med det formål at vurdere eller analysere den planlagte fusion til konkurrencevilkår, konkurrenter(faktiske eller potentielle) og mar kedsvilkår.

In addition, in a number of places in the judgment under appeal, among others in paragraphs 398, 428 and 451, the Court of First Instance stated that the Commission did not, following the response of the parties to the concentration to the statement of objections, carry out any new market investigations in order to test the validity of its altered assessment of the proposed concentration.
Flere steder i den appellerede dom bl.a. i præmis 398, 428 og 451 har Retten endvidere bemærket, at Kommissionen efter fusionsdeltagernes svar på klagepunktsmeddelelsen undlod at foretage nye markedsundersøgelser for at efterprøve, om der var grundlag for dens ændrede vurdering af den påtænkte fusion.

However, for the reasons outlined in the Commission's original decision and subsequently upheld by the Court(notably, the'failing firm defence', which- see above- had to be examined'ex tunc') the proposed concentration would not be responsible for a deterioration in the competitive structure of the market.
Af de grunde, der blev anført i Kommissionens oprindelige beslutning og derefter stadfæstet af Domstolen(bl.a. failing company-argumentet, der som nævnt ovenfor måtte vurderes ex tune), ville den planlagte fusion imidlertid ikke være årsagen til forværringen af konkurrencestrukturerne på markedet.

On the wholesale business in fuel and domestic heating oil and control of the‘logistical chain', itemerged from the Commission's analysis that the proposed concentration would have led to a singleintegrated refiner holding 55% of refining capacity and an equivalent share in the wholesale car fuel anddomestic heating oil markets and controlling most French import depots, the three main pipelinessupplying every corner of France and a substantial share of the local depots.
Med hensyn til engrossalg af motorbrændstof og fyringsolie samt kontrol med»logistikkæden« fremgikdet af Kommissionens analyse, at den planlagte fusion ville have ført til, at et enkelt integreretolieselskab ville komme til at sidde på 55% af raffineringskapaciteten og en tilsvarende andel afmarkederne for motorbrændstof og fyringsolie og samtidig ville kontrollere de fleste franskeimportdepoter og de tre største rørledninger, der forsyner alle egne af Frankrig, og desuden ville have enbetydelig andel af de lokale olielagre.

In Crown Cork and Seal/Carnaud Metal-Box, following a detailed second-phase analysis of both the horizontal and vertical issues raised, the Commission determined that the only market in which the proposed concentration threat ened to create a dominant position was the market for tinplate aerosol cans.
I Crown Cork and Seal/Carnaud MetalBox fastslog Kommissionen efter en indgående fase 2-undersøgelse af såvel de horisontale som de vertikale problemer, fusionen ville give anledning til, at det eneste marked, hvor fusionen risikerede at skabe en dominerende stilling, var markedet for aerosoldåser af hvidblik.

On 14 October 2003 the Commission received a notification, pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation(EEC) No 4064/89(the Merger Regulation), of a proposed concentration by which the undertaking Oracle Corporation(Oracle, United States) acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the undertaking PeopleSoft Inc.(PeopleSoft, United States) by way of a public bid.
Den 14. oktober 2003 modtog Kommissionen en anmeldelse i henhold til artikel 4 i forordning(EØF) nr. 4064/89(herefter benævnt"fusionsforordningen") af en påtænkt fusion, hvorved virksomheden Oracle Corporation(herefter benævnt"Oracle", USA) gennem et offentligt overtagelsestilbud erhverver enekontrol med virksomheden PeopleSoft Inc.(herefter benævnt"PeopleSoft", USA), jf. fusionsforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra b.

Given the highly specialized needs of patients andtheir great product awareness and given the basic characteristics of demand, with a limited number ofhospitals, and the importance of product innovation, in particular the development of recombinanttechnologies, it seemed unlikely that the proposed concentration would create or strengthen a collectivedominant position in the affected markets.
I betragtning af patienternes meget individuelle behov og store produktbevidsthed, de grundlæggende træk ved efterspørgslen, der er præget af et begrænset antal hospitaler, samt betydningen af produktudvikling, specielt indførelsen af rekombinant-teknologier, forekom det ikke sandsynligt, at fusionen ville skabe eller styrke nogen kollektiv dominans på de berørte markeder.

In thelight of the common market features set out above and given in particular significant competition fromnational players(e.g. in the Greek market for retail motor fuels) or the high share of imports and thepossibility for market entry(e.g. in the Austrian lubricants markets), the proposed concentration wasnot considered likely to create or strengthen a dominant position.
I lyset af de ovenfor beskrevne fællestræk og i betragtning af den hårde konkurrence fra nationale aktører(f. eks. på det græske marked for detailsalg af motorbrændstoffer), den høje importandel og muligheden for nye konkurrenters indtrængning på markedet(f. eks. på det østrigske marked for smøremidler) fandt Kommissionen det ikke sandsynligt, at fusionen ville skabe eller styrke nogen dominerende stilling.

For the calculation of turnover for insurance undertakings, we give the following example proposed concen tration between insurances A and B.
Til illustration af, hvordan forsikringsselskabers omsætning beregnes, gives følgende eksempel planlagt sammenslutning mellem forsikringsselskab A og B.