Eksempler på brug af Question on the interpretation of article på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
By judgment of 19 December 2000 the Cour de cassation(France) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 29 EC.
Ved dom By judgment of 4 December 1997, the Hof van Cassatie referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 2 and 5(1)of the Brussels Convention as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 hereinafter'the Convention.
Ved dom By order of 5 February 2002 the Alands förvaltningsdomstolen(Administrative Court, Aland) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 49 EC.
Ved kendelse By an order of 19 December 1988, the Corte Suprema di Cassazione[Supreme Court of Cassation] referred a question on the interpretation of Article 35 of Council Regulation(EEC) No. 222/77 on Community transit for a preliminary ruling.
Ved kendelse By order of 19 December 2001, received at the Court on 16 January 2002,the Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC a question on the interpretation of Article 29 EC.
Ved kendelse By judgment of 21 June 1988, received at the Court Registry on 4 August 1988,the Cour de Cassation[Court of Cassation], Paris, referred for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 5(3) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Ved dom By judgment of 8 January 1993, which was received at the Court on 15 January 1993,the Court du Travail de Liège(Labour Court, Liège) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 5 of Council Directive 76/207/EEC.
Ved dom By order of 4 April 2001 the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart(Administrative Court, Stuttgart) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 2 of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions and, more generally, on the compatibility with Community law of limiting compulsory military service in Germany to men.
Ved kendelse By judgment of 21 December 2001 the Conseil d'État(Council of State) referred for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 17 EC and 18 EC.
Ved dom By order of 16 December 1993 received at the Court on 4 February 1994,the Tribunal Superior de Justicia, Andalusia, referred for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 25 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Portugal and the adjustments to the Treaties and of Protocol No 2 thereto, in conjunction with the provisions of the EEC, now the EC, and ECSC Treaties concerning the free movement of goods.
Ved kendelse By order of 16 November 1993, received at the Court on 23 November 1993,the Østre Landsret referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 1 of Council Directive 75/129/EEC.
Ved kendelse By judgment of 13 February 2001, received at the Court of Justice on 16 February 2001,the Cour de cassation(Court of Cassation) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC a question on the interpretation of Article 40 of Council Regulation(EEC) No 2392/89 of 24 July 1989 laying down general rules for the description and presentation of wines and grape musts, as amended by Council Regulation(EEC) No 3897/91 of 16 December 1991.
Ved dom By a decision of 15 February 1993, which was received at the Court on 14 April 1993,the French Conseil d'État referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 7 of Council Directive 78/686/EEC.
Ved beslutning truffet den 15. februar 1993, indgået til Domstolen den 14. april s.a.,havde Frankrigs Conseil d'Etat forelagt Domstolen et præjudicielt spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 7 i Rådets direktiv 78/686/EØF.By order of 8 October 2001 the Tribunal d'instance de Metz(Court of First Instance, Metz) referred to the Court for a preliminary reference a question on the interpretation of Articles 145 to 151 of Council Regulation(EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992.
Ved kendelse By an order of 10 November 1988, which was received at the Court on 12 December 1988,the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt-am-Main referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 18 of Commission Regulation(EEC) No. 2192/82.
Ved kendelse By judgment of 31 January 1995, the Tribunal de Police, La Rochelle, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 4(6) of Council Regulation(EEC) No 3820/85 hereinafter'the regulation.
Ved dom By order of 19 April 2001 the Corte suprema dicassazione(Supreme Court of Cassation) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Articles 10 EC, 12 EC, 14 EC, 39 EC, 43 EC and 149 EC.
Ved kendelse By judgment of 31 March 1999, the Tribunal de Première Instance(Court of First Instance), Tournai, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 19 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977.
Ved dom By judgment of 4 October 1989, received at the Court on 9 November 1989, the Tribunal de Police[local criminal court], 111kirch(France),referred a question on the interpretation of Article 5 of Council Directive 76/207/EEC to the Court for a preliminary ruling.
Ved dom By order of 23 January 1990, which was received at the Court on 19 April 1990, the Bestendige Deputatie of the Brabant Provincial Council(Belgium) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 33 of the Sixth Council VAT Directive.
Ved kendelse By order of 18 May 1995, received at the Court on 31 May 1995, the Gerechtshof(Regional Court of Appeal)'sHertogenbosch referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 9 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 hereinafter'the Sixth Directive.
Ved dom By order of 19 December 1994, received at the Court on 19 October 1995, the Value Added Tax Tribunal, Manchester Tribunal Centre,referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpretation of Article 11C(1) of the Sixth Council Directive(77/388/EEC)of 17 May 1977'the Sixth Directive.
Ved kendelse By judgment of 5 January 1999, the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden(Supreme Court of the Netherlands) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling four questions on the interpretation of Article 1 of Council Directive 83/189/EEC of 28 March 1983.
Ved dom By judgment of 27 January 1999, the Rechtbank van Eerste Aanleg te Gent referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 6 of Council Directive 89/592/EEC of 13 November 1989 coordinating regulations on insider dealing.
Ved dom By decision of 3 August 1993, received at the Court on 16 November 1993, the Polymeles Protodikeio Athinon(Court of First Instance, Athens)referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 25 et seq. and Article 29 of the Directive 77/91/EEC hereinafter'the Second Directive.
Ved beslutning By order of 20 June 1990, received at the Court Registry on 4 July 1990, the Verwaltungsgerichtshof[Higher Administrative Court]Baden-Württemberg referred for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 21 of Council Regulation(EEC) No 2772/75.
Ved kendelse By order of 20 May 1992, which was received at the Court on 28 July 1992,the German Bundessozialgericht referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 20 of Council Directive 78/686/EEC and, in the alternative, Article 52 of the EEC Treaty.
Ved kendelse By order of 8 January 1993, which was received at the Court on 20 January 1993, the Gerechtshof,Leeuwarden, referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling two questions on the interpretation of Article 2(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC.
Ved kendelse By two orders of 12 August 1997 and an order of 27 October 1997,the Verwaltungsgerichtshof(Austrian Administrative Court) referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling three questions on the interpretation of Article 33 of the Sixth Council Directive(77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977'the Sixth Directive.
Ved to kendelser By order of 26 February 2001 the Handelsgericht Wien(Commercial Court, Vienna)referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling four questions on the interpretation of Articles 28 EC, 30 EC and 307 EC, and Council Regulation(EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992.
Ved kendelse 
