Eksempler på brug af Recurrence of injurious dumping på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
LIKELIHOOD OF RECURRENCE OF INJURIOUS DUMPING.
It has been found that there is a likelihood of continuation and/or recurrence of injurious dumping.
Conclusion on the recurrence of injurious dumping.
In conclusion, in the absence of measures, there is likelihood of recurrence of injury and, having also regard to the situation on dumping, there is likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping.
Conclusion on recurrence of injurious dumping.
The Commission's findings are, therefore, based on those established under Article 11(2)relating to the likelihood of continuation and recurrence of injurious dumping should the existing measures be removed.
Conclusion on recurrence of injurious dumping.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of this type of review is to determine whether, or not,expiry of the measures would lead to continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping.
Conclusion on the recurrence of injurious dumping.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of this type of review is to determine whether, or not,the expiry of the measures would lead to a continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION and/or RECURRENCE OF INJURIOUS DUMPING.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of this type of review is to determine whether ornot the expiry of the measures would lead to a continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION and/or RECURRENCE OF INJURIOUS DUMPING.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of an expiry review is to determine whether, or not,the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping.
CONCLUSION ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE RECURRENCE OF INJURIOUS DUMPING.
It should be stressed that the findings set out below were established only for the purposes of the present anti-dumping investigation andmore particularly for the purposes of determining the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping.
In view of the above, the examination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping was done on the basis of the information available.
In the framework of this review, it was examined whether there were compelling reasons to conclude that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case, despite the conclusions on dumping, injury and likely recurrence of injurious dumping.
On this basis it was examined, whether,despite the conclusions on continuation and recurrence of injurious dumping compelling reasons exist which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
The weighted average Thai export prices to the United States of America and to Japan in the IP, without distinction of screen sizes, converted to a constructed cif Community border price, were below those of the Community industry and along the lines of those originating in Malaysia,for which it has been concluded that a likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping exists.
On this basis it was examined, whether,despite the conclusions on a likelihood of a continuation and recurrence of injurious dumping, it could be clearly be concluded that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
The present review exceeded the period of one year within which it should normally have been concluded pursuant to Article 11(5) of the Basic Regulation, due to the complexity of the investigation, and in particular due to the difficulties in obtaining and assessing data concerning the currency devaluation in the Far East andits impact on the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping.
On this basis it was examined whether, despite the findings on dumping, injury and continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, on the situation of the Community industry andthe likely continuation and/or recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons exist which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
On this basis, it was examined, whether, despite the findings on dumping, injury and continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping respectively, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
On this basis it was examined, whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, on the situation of the Community industry and on the likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
On this basis it was examined whether,despite the conclusion on the benefit of the measures for the Community industry and on the likelihood of a recurrence of injurious dumping should measures expire, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.