Eksempler på brug af Transitional period should på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Thirdly, the transitional period should be extended.
Given that euro banknotes andcoins are widely available to the public, such a transitional period should in future be as short as possible.
For lettuce this transitional period should be time-limited, but for spinach an end date is not yet foreseen.
In order to allow methods for the analysis of official samples to be adapted to the provisions of this Decision, a transitional period should be laid down.
A transitional period should also be provided for in respect of materials and articles which are brought into contact with foodstuffs before the deadline for implementation of this Directive.
In addition, the rationale behind the transitional period should not be undermined.
However, I consider that the transitional period should be consistent with that applied to previous new Member States and should therefore be calculated with reference to their date of accession to the European Union.
We know what we want and it is the will of this Parliament, butit is crucial that the transitional period should not be extended beyond what is strictly necessary.
Accepting as we do that the transitional period should last until 1 January 2002, it is now important to raise the other problems, the proper resolution of which is of great importance to the credibility of the euro that we all wish to see.
This suggests that if a Madrid-style transitional period is used for any further introductions of the euro, the transitional period should be shorter than three years.
We are unanimous both in our overall opinion that the transitional period should be extended by a reasonable amount of time and in our adherence to the principle of a consistent ban on the feeding of animal protein to ruminants.
In order to encourage the establishment of shorter transitional periods than the maximum permissible threeyear period, the ECB also recommends that the recitals to the proposed regulation clarify that the transitional period should be as short as possible.
My group supports the Commission in its viewpoint that the so-called transitional period should ideally be maintained, despite the fact that its lapsing coincides with the frantic Christmas shopping period. .
This transitional period should also take into account the requirements of Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs4.
In addition to this overall limit, the ECB recommends that the recitals to the proposed regulation clarify that the transitional period should be as short as possible, so as to encourage the establishment of shorter transitional periods than the maximum permissible three-year period. .
Whereas the transitional period should apply only to names registered under Article 17 of Regulation(EEC) No 2081/92, since the granting of this adjustment period should not prejudice producers with regard to existing names already used in the Member States;
To facilitate the transition to the regime provided by Decision 2000/86/EC, and in order toavoid trade disruption, a limited transitional period should be granted for the import of fishery products certified by the competent Chinese authority no later than 2 February 2000 and arriving in the Community no later than 1 March 2000.
This transitional period should also take into account the requirements of Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs(2), as amended by Commission Directive 2001/101/EC3.
Nevertheless, it does seem reasonable that buses of 15 metres, which are already authorised and which do not conform to the above-mentioned requirements, that is to say, the three axles and manoeuvrability,nevertheless should benefit from a transitional period and that that transitional period should be longer than the one initially laid down. The original proposal was a period lasting until 2009.
Whereas, in view of the volume of investment required in this sector, a transitional period should be laid down to enable Member States to retain temporarily certain specific national provisions concerning construction requirements or the use of tanks, receptacles, packaging or an emergency action code;
In the 1994 Treaty of Accession the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden were granted a transitional period until 31 December 1999 for applying the Directive 66/404/EEC andthe Republic of Finland also for applying Directive 71/161/EEC; this transitional period should be extended in order to allow the above mentioned countries to maintain their national schemes until the implementation date of this Directive at the latest.
Hence, the transitional period should be about fifteen years, certainly not less than ten, and the compensatory aid should include guaranteed earnings for Community producers and a market for the produce of the outermost regions, and so aid should also be included for the bodies that market the bananas produced there.
In cases where there are significant income and price differences, a transitional period should certainly be allowed, during which- even beyond 2009 as stipulated in the Accession Treaties in cases of proven necessity- more prosperous neighbouring countries can protect their internal market by keeping administratively set thresholds in place and continuing to monitor these thresholds.
Whereas a transitional period should be allowed to producer organizations already recognized under Regulation(EEC) No 1035/72(9) which cannot immediately meet the requirements of this Regulation for recognition; whereas such organizations must be able to show themselves able to make the necessary changes;
However, this transitional period should be granted only to trade marks bearing the above indications where an application for registration was made before the publication of Council Regulation(EC) No 1804/1999 of 19 July 1999 supplementing Regulation(EEC) No 2092/91 to include livestock production(7), and where the operator has been duly informed of the fact that the products have not been produced by the organic production method.
Whereas such extension of the transitional period should be considered if sufficient experience has not been gained for setting reasonable levels of fees ensuring the principle of self-financing whilst safeguarding the attractiveness of the Community system of plant variety protection; whereas such experience could only be gained by observing the number of applications for a Community plant variety right, the costs paid to the Examination Offices and the actual duration of Community plant variety rights granted;
On the other hand, it has been demanded of the new Member States that, prior to accession, they should have adopted andimplemented the whole of the acquis communautaire and that the transitional periods should be few and brief.
Transitional periods should also be provided for in relation to other provisions of this Directive in order to allow the necessary modifications in production to take place and for disposal of stocks, particularly for products other than cigarettes.
Where Member States require health warnings in the form of colour photographs or other illustrations, transitional periods should be provided for in order to allow for the necessary changes in the production and packaging process for tobacco products and for the disposal of stocks.
This date is the result of an error; as a matter of fact, eligibility for transitional measures as from the date of entry into force of Regulation(EC) No 2200/96 would have been meaningless since Regulation(EEC) No 1035/72 was still in force until 31 December 1996. Instead,the starting date for the transitional periods should have been the date of application of Regulation(EC) No 2200/96.