Eksempler på bruk av Mean difference på Engelsk og deres oversettelse til Norsk
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Mean difference from placebo†.
Cimzia 200 mg+ MTX- Placebo+ MTX Mean Difference.
Mean difference from placebo† 95% CI.
Observed treatment difference vs placebo mean difference.
The mean difference in weight loss with the drug compared to placebo was 3.2 kg.
We summarized the study level results in texts and tables andcalculated effect estimates(relative risk and mean difference).
The standardized mean difference was 0.42 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.15 to 0.69.
Psychodynamic interpersonal therapy possibly reduces psychiatric symptoms(mean difference[MD]: -5.0, 95% CI: -9.7 to -0.3).
The mean difference in scores for patient satisfaction between the groups in one study was 0.5(p= 0.021).
We summarized the resultsby random-effects meta-analyses and presented standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals.
The standardised mean difference was 0.64 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.35 to 0.92, corresponding to a moderate effect.
Dichotomous outcomes werepresented as relative risk(RR), and continuous outcomes as mean differences(MD) with 95% confidence intervals.
The standardised mean difference was -0.16 with a 95% confidence interval of -0.27 to -0.06(small effect, reduction of symptoms).
Other studies that compared cognitive therapies with no intervention orusual care reported their results as mean differences.
The standardised mean difference was 1.00 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.37 to 1.64(large effect, improvement of symptoms).
Effect estimates were calculated as risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes andmean difference or standardized mean difference(SMD) for continuous outcomes.
The average prevalence of substantial shoulder problems was 5%(95% CI 4% to 6%) in the intervention group and 8%(95% CI 7% to 9%)in the control group(mean difference 3%).
In females administered mirabegron at the 50 mg dose, the mean difference from placebo on QTcI interval at 5 hours post dose was 3.67 msec upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI 5.72 msec.
Results: The average prevalence of shoulder problems during the season was 17%(95% CI 16% to 19%) in the intervention group and 23%(95% CI 21% to 26%)in the control group(mean difference 6%).
We used risk ratio(RR) for dichotomy outcomes,weighted mean difference(MD) for continuous outcomes and calculated 95% confidence interval(CI) for the effect estimates.
However, it found effect favouring LCP in 1 of 6 sub-scales,with regards to personnel exhibiting more respect, dignity, and kindness(mean difference: 8.4[95% CI 0.3 to16.6]).
They showed a mean difference between the groups of 4.38 days(95% Ci -5.59 to 14.39) in favour of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
The Italian study did not detect a significant difference in the overall quality of palliative care between LCP wards and control wards(mean difference: 7.6[95% CI -3.6 to 18.7]).
In orlistat-treated patients, the mean difference from placebo in weight loss was 1.83 kg to 3.06 kg and the mean difference from placebo in HbA1c reduction was 0.18% to 0.55.
Treatment with TOBI Podhaler for 28 days resulted in a statistically significant reduction in P. aeruginosa sputum density mean difference with placebo about 2.70 log10 in colony forming units/CFUs.
A slight reduction in heart rate(mean difference over 24 h -2 bpm when compared to placebo), which is a known effect of low exposures to anticholinergic compounds in young healthy subjects, was observed.
Treatment with duloxetine showed a statistically significantly greater improvement in GAD symptoms,as measured by PARS severity score for GAD(mean difference between duloxetine and placebo of 2.7 points[95% CI 1.3-4.0]), after 10 weeks of treatment.
In study III, the mean difference compared to placebo was -0.94h, 95% CI[-1.36, -0.51], p< 0.0001. There was also a statistically significant improvement over placebo with the rasagiline 0.5 mg group, yet the magnitude of improvement was lower.
Insuman Implantable administered in continuous intraperitoneal infusion was also similar to semi-synthetic human insulin as demonstrated by the refill accuracy criteria over the 4-refill cycles per protocol population: mean difference: -3.15± 1.34; 95% CI: -5.81; -0.50.
Humira was numerically favoured for the majority of subscores with statistically significant mean differences for general vision, ocular pain, near vision, mental health, and total score in Study UV I, and for general vision and mental health in Study UV II.