Exemplos de uso de Minimally invasive surgeries em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
A possible criticism of minimally invasive surgeries refers to longer times of aortic clamping and CPB.
Moreover, there is sufficient number of randomized controlled studies that prove, unequivocally,the real advantages of minimally invasive surgeries when compared to conventional techniques 2,3.
Minimally invasive surgeries cause less surgical trauma and less pain and may result in a shorter hospital stay.
Therefore, it is clear the importance of the minimally invasive surgeries, a dramatic breakthrough in surgery. .
The minimally invasive surgeries are performed in order to reduce operative trauma and possibly reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality.
Patients and methods: descriptive observational study like case series,including 20 minimally invasive surgeries performed between january 1, 2004 and december 31, 2013.
Reported their experience of minimally invasive surgeries with the aid of video, including being performed a pioneering procedure by periareolar access.
Several strategies have been described in the attempt of minimizing the inflammatory response, such as minimally invasive surgeries[4], antiinflammatory drugs[5,6] and hemofiltration during surgery. .
Minimally invasive surgeries refer to a variety of infusion techniques and visualization, allowing to perform surgeries with smaller incisions 4-7.
Some studies suggest that performing minimally invasive surgeries can be associated with a higher incidence of stroke.
Minimally invasive surgeries are characterized by reduced surgical trauma and they are associated with smaller incisions. Both direct visualization and endoscopy can be employed 1.
Once overcome the learning curve andproper training of all staff involved, minimally invasive surgeries can become an attractive option for many patients with these conditions.
Minimally invasive surgeries have been performed since the early 1990s, however, because they are technically more elaborate and require specific training, their acceptance is still limited.
The conclusions reached were the same as the ones from other authors: minimally invasive surgeries are at the very least equal to conventional surgeries and the biggest challenge lies in myocardial protection methods.
Minimally invasive surgeries with the help of thoracoscopy with the use of robotics or not demand specific training with a considerable amount of time spent to acquire these special abilities, such as for coronary artery surgeries and for the correction of persistent atrial fibrillation.
The authors concluded that despite the lack of statistically significant data in favor of minimally invasive surgeries, they proved to be just as effective as conventional surgeries, which justifies performing the less invasive procedure.
Patient selection for minimally invasive surgeries should be cautious and, in our opinion, can only be extended as it exceeds the initial learning curve.
The results of the presentstudy demonstrated that the intensity of donor area pain in the postoperative period, in patients submitted to minimally invasive surgeries to harvest bone grafts from the iliac crest, did not differ depending on whether the SOBRAPAR bone extractor(group A), or the UCLA bone extractor(group B) was used.
With the introduction of minimally invasive surgeries, catheterization and abdominal angioplasty, the study of the celiac trunk diameter and length, as well as its distance to the upper mesenteric artery became necessary for a better preoperative planning.
The vacuum drainage is closely related to minimally invasive surgeries advocating small surgical incisions and optimization of the operative field.
Introduction: currently, minimally invasive surgeries, such as laparoscopic techniques, offer the best postoperative results for the treatment of urologic diseases.
Multicenter studies have shown the real benefits of minimally invasive surgeries, confirming low morbidity and mortality, excellent aesthetic benefits and rapid postoperative recovery.
Our initial series with minimally invasive surgeries involved the implementation of correction of ASD n=24, aortic valve replacement n=33, mitral valve replacement n=12, mitral valve repair n=24 resection left atrial myxoma n=2 and subaortic membrane resection n=1.
However, there is a tendency to perform minimally invasive surgeries, aimed at early rehabilitation and minimize the overloading of adjacent levels when compared to arthrodesis.
The results of our initial series with minimally invasive surgeries confirm the observations of other authors that, in selected cases, plasty or valve replacement surgeries, correction of some congenital heart disease and atrial myxoma resection can be performed safely and with mortality rates comparable to those obtained through conventional sternotomy 3,11.
In children, its indication is restricted to a few diseases, but minimally invasive surgeries are growing, and even pelvic osteotomies are being performed with the aid of a video monitor, reducing the incidence of surgical injuries.
Minimally invasive surgery has earned boundless acceptance.
Background: surgical instruments used in minimally invasive surgery may offer risk of cross infection.
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in brazil.
Minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer.