Exemplos de uso de Was admissible em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Indeed, the paragraph, as written, was admissible.
The Commission decided that the complaint was admissible and an investigation was formally initiated on 9 April 1997.
The marriage between brothers and sisters was admissible in the.
The Commission's report, concerned with what was admissible, also pointed out the change in Brazilian legislation in 1996 that brought military police crimes against the lives of civilians into common jurisdiction.
Fore we must accept that such marriage was admissible in the law of.
Thus, because the decision of the Jordanian Court of Cassation occurred after the BIT came into force,this claim was admissible.
On the other hand, the action was admissible as regards Article 100a.
I felt that, under the Rules, certain parts of the text could be reviewed, possibly involving the publication of a corrigendum;but that the report, as such, was admissible.
The question raised legal questions as to what was admissible as a motive for an administrative authority to ban an activity for motives of public order, especially as the conseil did not want to include"public morality" in public order.
The Court found that, although Rendo's complaint concerning electricityimports had not been rejected but had remained pending during the Article 169proceedings, the application was admissible.
The Commission determined that the requirement of having exhausted domestic remedies had been met, and that the petition was admissible with respect to the cited Articles of the American Convention and Article 7 of the Convention of Belém do Pará.
It therefore stated, in paragraph 148 of the judgment under appeal, that the Commission's plea that the action was timebarred had to be dismissed and, in paragraph 150 of that judgment,ruled that the claim for compensation was admissible.
The petitioner maintained that domestic remedies had been duly exhausted and that his petition was admissible, inasmuch as the exception to the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies provided for in an Article 46(2)(a) of the American Convention was applicable.
After analyzing the parties' positions, the Commission concluded that it was competent to hear the petitioners' case and that said case was admissible under Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention.
The applicant points out that the evidence produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal was admissible and that the judgment in OHIM v Kaul, cited in paragraph 27 above, confirms that it is possible to submit facts and evidence for the first time at the stage of the appeal before OHIM.
In the contested decision, the Commission stated, first,that it had concluded in Decision 2003/549 that the application submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands was admissible and referred, in that respect, to that decision.
The BSG v. Guinea arbitral tribunal ruled that a request for reallocation of the advance on costs was admissible even if made at the subsequent stages of the arbitral proceedings regardless of the fact that the applicant“knew since the start of the arbitration about the circumstances which it[…] invokes.”2.
After reviewing the positions of the parties,the Commission concluded that it was competent to hear the claim filed by the petitioners and that the case was admissible, in light of Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention.
The Court's decision that the application was admissible appears to have been based upon the Court's view of the desirability of a right of recourse to it for those whose'legitimate interests' might require protec tion in this manner, and the fact that had the Commission found a breach of Articles 85 or 86 to exist it would have had the power to oblige the undertaking in question to take any measures necessary to put an end thereto.
By the first plea,the Federal Republic of Germany and Glunz and OSB claim that the contested judgment is marred by an error of law in that the Court of First Instance declared that the action brought by Kronofrance was admissible.
The Commission determined that the requirement that domestic remedies be exhausted was excused because she had been denied effective access to such remedies,and that the petition was admissible with respect to Article 1, 8, 24 and 25 of the American Convention, and that it would analyze the remaining contentions in the merits phase.
The Vice-President in the Chair at the time ruled out this request because no notification had been given 24 hours in advance and because I, as President,had already decided that the report was admissible.
The Commission concluded, first,that the application that the Kingdom of the Netherlands had notified to it on 21 January 2003 with a view to obtaining approval of its national provisions on the use of SCCPs was admissible and, second, that in view of the complexity of the matter and of the absence of evidence highlighting a danger for human health, it was justified to extend the period referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 95(6) EC for a further period expiring on 20 December 2003.
The Commission approved Report No 102/99 on September 21, 1999, during its 104th regular session. In that report,the Commission declared that it was competent to hear this case and that the petition was admissible under Articles 46 and 47 of the Convention.
Before replying to the question referred for a preliminary ruling, the Court wondered whether the Directeur des Contributions constituted a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 177 of the Treaty and, therefore,whether the question was admissible.
Kronofrance maintains, on the other hand, that the Court was fully entitled to hold that it was an interested party within the meaning of Regulation No 659/1999 andthat its action against the contested decision was admissible, since it had sought to secure compliance with the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 88(2) EC.
On October 10, 2001, during its 113o regular period of sessions, the Commission approved Report No 72/01,in which it established that it had competence to examine the case and that the petition was admissible in accordance with the terms of Articles 46 and 47 of the Convention.
Having contrasted the'procedural gap'- the absence of relief specifically recognized in the Treaties- and the'fundamental interest' which attached to the maintenance of the institutional balance established in the Treaties,the Court concluded that an action for annulment brought by Parliament against an act of the Council or of the Commission was admissible provided that the action sought only to safeguard its prerogatives and that it was founded only on submissions based on the infringement of those prerogatives.
Import licence applications shall be admissible only where the following conditions are fulfilled.
None of this is admissible in court.