Exemple de utilizare a Normal threshold în Engleză și traducerile lor în Română
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
This amount represents 41.12% of the normal threshold for intervention of the Fund.
At just 6.26% of the normal threshold applicable to Greece for mobilising the Solidarity Fund, the application was examined under the exceptional criteria for"extraordinary regional disasters".
The disaster caused damage of some EUR 17.858 million,representing 0.55% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Fund(EUR 3 267 million).
A disaster representing 2% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Fund was not considered to be falling within the rationale of the Fund.
This amount represents 0.07% of the Greek GNI of EUR 221.672 billion(based on 2007 data),i.e. only 11% of the normal threshold for mobilisation of the Fund for Greece3.
Poland's application therefore met the normal threshold for the mobilisation of the Fund and was treated as a"major natural disaster".
The total direct damage was estimated at EUR 591.94 million,representing approximately 0.27% of Austria's GNI or 45% of the normal threshold for mobilising the EUSF in Austria(0.6% of GNI).
The damage represents 17.62% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Italy in 2009 of EUR 3.399 billion.
The"neighbouring country" criterion allows countries which have suffered from the same disaster as a neighbouring country for which a major disaster has been recognised to apply for aid, even ifthe amount of damage is below the normal threshold.
This amount represents 0.67% of Romania's GNI and exceeds the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund of EUR 787.935 million.
As this amount represents 4.4% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Fund, the application was based on the“extraordinary regional disaster” criterion.
The Hungarian authorities reported total direct damages of EUR 719.343 million,representing 0.73% of Hungarian GNI and representing 121.78% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Hungary in 2010 of EUR 590.710 million.
This figure represents 112.69% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Portugal in 2010 of EUR 958.406 million.
The 2006 flooding caused direct damage of some EUR 372 million, almost three times the amount of damage caused in the preceding year, butstill lower than the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund of EUR 1.004 billion, i.e. 0.6% of Greece's Gross National Income(GNI).
As total damage remained below the normal threshold for mobilising the Fund the application was examined under the criteria for“extraordinary regional disaster”.
The damage was estimated by the Cypriot authorities at€ 38.2 million,representing 48% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Fund applicable to Cyprus(EUR 79.895 million).
As total damage remained below the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund the application was examined under the criteria for“extraordinary regional disaster”.
The total direct damage was estimated at EUR 2.998 billion representing 0.846% of Polish GNI and exceeding by far the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Poland in 2010 of EUR 2.124 billion.
This amount represents less than 3% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Cyprus in 2009 of EUR 88.552 million(i.e. 0.6% of GNI based on 2007 data).
I agree with the adjusted amount for mobilisation from the European Union Solidarity Fund(EUSF), given that in several countries, namely Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania,the direct damage caused by natural disasters exceeds the normal threshold of 0.6% of Gross National Income required for mobilising the EUSF.
Damage of EUR 709.74 million was reported,representing 20.47% of the normal threshold of EUR 3.467 billion applicable to Spain for mobilising the Solidarity Fund.
A disaster representing no more than 0.55% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Fund was not considered to be falling within this rationale of the Fund, not even under exceptional circumstances or if a remote or isolated region was concerned.
The Irish authorities estimated the direct damage at EUR 520.9 million,representing 0.33% of GNI and 55.68% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Ireland in 2010 of EUR 935.456 million.
Although the total losses remain below the normal threshold, the request made by Ireland falls under the criterion of'extraordinary regional disaster', which sets out the conditions for mobilising the Solidarity Fund'under exceptional circumstances'.
The total direct damage was calculated at EUR 153.039 million,representing 55.49% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund in Croatia in 2010 of EUR 275.804 million.
Although the amount of direct damage was below the normal threshold for triggering the EU Solidarity Fund(0.6% of gross national income, €566.8 million in the case of Romania), the Commission was able to mobilise the fund under the"exceptional circumstances" provision in the EUSF Regulation.
This figure represents 0.02% of Italian GNI, and just 6.11% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Italy of EUR 3.467 billion in 2010.
As the total direct damage of EUR 211.6 million remained below the normal threshold for a"major disaster", representing 6.5% of the applicable threshold of EUR 3 267 million, the application was examined under the criteria for extraordinary regional disasters.
This amount represents 0.89% of Slovakia's GNI and represents 148.37% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund applicable to Slovakia in 2010 of EUR 378.205 million.
While this constitutes just 0.15% of Czech GNI,or 24.81% of the normal threshold for mobilising the Solidarity Fund in the Czech Republic in 2010 of EUR 824.029 million, the application fulfilled the neighbouring country criterion as both Poland and Slovakia's applications were accepted as"major disasters".