Exemples d'utilisation de To formulate an objection en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Government… intends to formulate an objection to the reservation made by.
The investigator replied that the attorney had no right to formulate an objection.
In that case,it would be legitimate for States which had fallen foul of such discrimination to formulate an objection.
Accordingly, only parties to a treaty were entitled to formulate an objection to reservations made to that treaty.
The scope of draft guideline 2.6.5 was unnecessarily broad in allowing any State andany international organization that was entitled to become a party to the treaty to formulate an objection.
 In order to request the limitation of the processing or to formulate an objection to the processing of his data, the user may contact the controller.
As is indicated in the eighth report, there seems to be no point in including in the definition itself any mention of the categories of States orinternational organizations able to formulate an objection.
In particular, doubts were expressed as to the freedom of a State to formulate an objection that had the result of undermining the object and purpose of the treaty.
The practice of the Council of Europe regarding the acceptance of late reservations, however,is to give contracting States a period of only nine months to formulate an objection J. p. 102.
In such a situation, acknowledging the successor State's capacity to formulate an objection to such a reservation up until the expiry of that period seems warranted.
Thus, for example, it should be emphasized at the outset that a State orinternational organization that has accepted a reservation loses its right to formulate an objection later to the same reservation.
It was observed that States had the"option" rather than the freedom to formulate an objection to a reservation, irrespective of the incompatibility of the reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty.
In such a situation, the capacity of a contracting State or contracting international organization or of a State orinternational organization party to the treaty to formulate an objection up until the expiry of that period should be recognized.
Only signatory States should be entitled to formulate an objection, since that possibility was closely linked to the obligation of signatory States not to defeat the purpose and object of the treaty before becoming parties to it.
The questions of the time of formulation and the categories of States andinternational organizations able to formulate an objection were highly complex and sensitive matters which should be treated in separate guidelines.
The view was also expressed that if reservations were allowed, and the reservation formulated by a State or an international organization was clear,other States did not have the freedom to formulate an objection.
Indeed, it is in every respect very important for States andinternational organizations to formulate an objection, when they deem it justified, in order to state publicly their position on the invalidity of a reservation.
Even though, according to the definition contained in draft guideline 2.6.1, an objection is a unilateral statement,it is perfectly possible for a number of States and/or a number of international organizations to formulate an objection jointly.
It goes without saying that the freedom to formulate an objection must be exercised in accordance with the provisions of the Guide to Practice- a point so self-evident that the Commission did not think it was worthwhile to mention it in the text of guideline 2.6.3.