Examples of using Cannot be extradited in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
He cannot be extradited for crimes committed in the U. S.
According to the Constitution, citizens of the Republic of Cyprus cannot be extradited abroad.
A foreign subject cannot be extradited for political criminal offenses.
On the other hand, in accordancewith Article 9 of the Turkish Penal Code, a Turkish national cannot be extradited to a foreign state.
Political refugees cannot be extradited because of their political principles(article 34 of the Constitution).
According to the same Article, as it is the rule in the current TPC, Turkish nationals cannot be extradited to third countries.
A national of Uzbekistan cannot be extradited for an offence committed in the territory of a foreign State, unless otherwise provided under international treaties or agreements.
At the time of thesentencing, Robinho was in Brazil, and under Brazilian law, a Brazilian citizen cannot be extradited by a foreign country.
As a legal person cannot be extradited, there is arguably a special responsibility on the home jurisdiction to prosecute a legal person within its jurisdiction.
I'm short selling them to purchase a very expensive plane ticket out of here tonight,one which gets me somewhere I cannot be extradited.
A person with refugee status whohas committed a terrorist offence in another country cannot be extradited if he/she would face the death penalty in the country where the crime was committed;
Extradition from Finland is only possible if the conduct in question is an offence in Finland. Nationals of Finland cannot be extradited. .
Moroccan nationals cannot be extradited, but they may be prosecuted in Morocco for offences committed abroad if a foreign country requests officially the Moroccan authorities to do so(aut dedere aut judicare).
At the same time,Brazil has signed bilateral agreements which provide that, if the accused cannot be extradited the State assumes the responsibility to try him.
Provided that Liechtenstein interests have been violated orthe perpetrator cannot be extradited the Liechtenstein criminal laws are applicable for special crimes(e.g. kidnapping or slave traffic) regardless of the law applicable at the place of crime.
These impediments can threaten the successful investigation and prosecution of war crimes cases because suspects cannot be extradited and evidence cannot be shared.
Jurisdiction and extradition(24) The Committee welcomes the Austrianextraterritorial jurisdiction on cases when the perpetrator cannot be extradited, but remains concerned that the Austrian Criminal Code only allows for extraterritorial jurisdiction for offences covered by the Optional Protocol in cases where Austrian interests are violated.
Extradition may only be carried out on the basis of a ratified international agreement and on the principle of reciprocity.A foreigner cannot be extradited for a political criminal offence, whereby acts of terrorism are not regarded as political criminal offences.
According to section 65, Austrian courts have jurisdiction over crimes committed outside Austria if they are punishable under locally applicable law andif the perpetrator is caught on Austrian territory and cannot be extradited for a reason other than the nature or features of his act.
Section 7(i)(h) of the said Act confers jurisdiction upon a Mauritian Court to try a person suspected of financing terrorism provided the suspect is, after the commission of the act, present in Mauritius whether the act constituting the offence is committed within or outside Mauritius andthe person cannot be extradited to a foreign State having jurisdiction over the offence.
One country specified that individuals with dual nationality could not be extradited.
A person could not be extradited to a country where he or she was liable to be subjected to the death penalty.
If evidence of such violations existed, or evena strong suspicion, the individual concerned could not be extradited.
Many treaty provisions were actually worded in a manner that obliged States to exercise theirjurisdiction when for some reason the detained person could not be extradited, for example when that person was a national of the concerned State.
In the present case, the Supreme Court reversed the Upper Regional Court 's decision that the author could not be extradited, and returned the case for a reconsideration that did not take into account the author ' s rights to a fair trial/appeal.
An important development in that context was the linking of jurisdiction and extradition measures in" extradite or prosecute" provisions, under which a State mustensure that it had jurisdiction to prosecute any offender who could not be extradited by reason of his or her nationality.
If these fugitives could not be extradited because of the theoretical possibility of the death penalty, they would be effectively irremovable and would have to be allowed to remain in the country, unpunished and posing a threat to the safety and security of the inhabitants.
Examples of such extension partly on the basis of international obligations were crimes where Austrian interests were impaired or the perpetrator was Austrian orthe foreign perpetrator could not be extradited; they included inter alia slavery, trafficking in persons, criminal organizations, drug crimes, crimes against the security of civil aviation, and production and distribution of weapons of mass destruction.
The obligation to extradite or prosecute was established in Cuban legislation and,notwithstanding the basic principle that Cuban citizens could not be extradited to another country, offenders faced criminal prosecution.
