Examples of using Has not provided any explanation in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Claimant has not provided any explanation of why it made this payment.
The author, though advised of this option, declined to pursue it and has not provided any explanation for this course.
It has not provided any explanation as to why it has not visited them earlier.
It notes, however, that the author has not provided any explanation in this connection.
The State party has not provided any explanation in connection with these allegations, including the reasons for the delay in initiating and completing the criminal investigation and proceedings on Mr. Novaković ' s death.
In addition, the Committee considers that the State party has not provided any explanation in this regard to justify the action described.
The complainant has not provided any explanation of the reasons for which he has not been involved in the activities of MLC after the departure from his country.
Recalling its general comment No. 8, according to which" pre-trial detention should be an exception and as short as possible",and noting that the State party has not provided any explanation justifying such a long delay, the Committee considers that the period of pre-trial detention constitutes in the present case an unreasonable delay.
The State party has not provided any explanation why it has taken such a long time to commence and complete investigations and to file indictments.
Recalling its General Comment 8 according to which" pre-trial detention should be an exception and as short as possible,and noting that the State party has not provided any explanation justifying such a long delay, the Committee considers that the period of pre-trial detention constitutes in the present case an unreasonable delay.
Noting also that the State party has not provided any explanation for the delay or presented any factors by which the delay could be attributed to the author, the Committee considers that the facts disclose a violation of article 14, paragraph 3(c).
Additionally, regardless of the content of that letter, the author maintains that he has never received any medical treatment during his detention and that prior to his detention,the author was in good health and the State party has not provided any explanation to show that his injuries did not result from torture or other ill-treatment while in detention.
The Working Group notes that the Government has not provided any explanation to justify the trial of Mr. Al Abadi, who is a civilian, by a military court.
The Committee observes that in its first presentation, on 2 March 2000, the State party denied that the author had been forced into exile, but that subsequently, after his detailed andspecific comments made on 22 August 2000, it has not provided any explanation or made any statement which would clarify the matter, in accordance with its obligations under article 4.2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee notes that the author has not provided any explanation on the relevance of Mr. Komzarov ' s possible testimony to the charges against him.
The author notes that the State party has not provided any explanation about the grounds of her husband ' s detention from 25 April to 24 May 2000, and adds that her husband ' s detention during this period could be confirmed by family members, friends, and relatives, who saw him leaving for his interrogation in the Ministry of Security and never coming back.
The Committee notes that the author has not provided any explanation regarding her motives for her voluntary departure to Mexico.
The Committee observes that the State party has not provided any explanation justifying the overall length of the proceedings of almost seven years, starting from the date of the author ' s application for review on 7 December 1998, to the decision by the Constitutional Court on 9 November 2005.
In light of the Committee ' s jurisprudence,and considering that the State party has not provided any explanation for the repeated postponements and the delay in proceedings, a delay of almost six years must be considered unreasonable and in violation of the right to an effective remedy in cases of torture.
The Committee observes that the author has not provided any explanation for such a delay other than the mere statement that at that time she was unable to regain her Czech citizenship.
The Committee notes that the State party has not provided any explanation as to the remedies available to the author, in particular, regarding his claims under article 25 of the Covenant.
I agree that, since the State party has not provided any explanations on the merits of the complaint, the Committee must give due weight to the allegations of the authors.
The authors further argue that the State party has not provided any explanation as to the arrest of Mensud Rizvanović without a warrant, and his transfer to the Keraterm camp by members of the VRS army.
The delegation had not provided any explanation on that point and he asked it to provide the necessary details.
It observed that the State party had not provided any explanation justifying the overall length of almost seven years, starting from the date of the author ' s application for review on 7 December 1998.
With respect to the length of proceedings before the Municipal Court in Zagreb,the author points out that the State party had not provided any explanation, justifying the overall length of the proceedings of almost eight years.
As regards the author ' s claims relating to article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant,the Committee observed that the author had not provided any explanation on how her nephew ' s right under this provision were violated.
In this connection, the Committee observes that the authors have not provided any explanation for such a delay other than the mere explanation that, at that time, they were unable to regain their Czech citizenship.
The Committee observes that the authors have not provided any explanation for such a delay other than the mere explanation that at that time, they were unable to regain their Czech citizenship.