Examples of using Impartial humanitarian in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Political
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Allow impartial humanitarian relief for civilians in need.
All parties must understand the importance of neutral and impartial humanitarian assistance.
(ii) any mission of an impartial humanitarian organization, including any impartial humanitarian demining mission; and.
Invites the Government of Myanmar to respect fully its obligations under the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949,and to avail itself of such services as may be offered by impartial humanitarian bodies;
An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.
Articles 17 and 81 authorize the ICRC, national societies,or other impartial humanitarian organizations to provide assistance to the victims of war.
An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.".
The Director General further stressed that where the basic needs of affected populations were not met,the parties to a conflict had to allow and facilitate the passage of impartial humanitarian relief.
(ii) any mission of an impartial humanitarian organisation, including any impartial humanitarian ERW clearance mission; and.
Invites the Government of Myanmar to respect fully its obligations under the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949,and to avail itself of such services as may be offered by impartial humanitarian bodies;
It states that an" impartial humanitarian body, such as the ICRC, may offer its services to the Party to the conflict".
Eleven days is too long for people to have to wait for humanitarian aid. It's crucial that the authorities allow impartial humanitarian assistance into the Awaran area in order to respond to any unmet needs.”.
It considers that the capacity of impartial humanitarian organizations to provide humanitarian assistance to the victims of armed conflicts has been adversely affected by the outbreak of new international conflicts.
Collectively, these risks will continue to create challenges in ensuring theprotection of civilians, the promotion of human rights and impartial humanitarian access to vulnerable groups, including the displaced population and returnees.
Invites the Government of Myanmar to fully respect its obligations under the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, in particular their common article 3,and to avail itself of such services as may be offered by impartial humanitarian bodies;
The personnel, infrastructures and means of transport of impartial humanitarian organizations must be protected and their activities facilitated by all parties to the conflict.
Calls upon the Government of Myanmar to respect fully the obligations of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, in particular the obligations in common article III,and to make use of such services as may be offered by impartial humanitarian bodies;
Failure to consistently recognize the strictly neutral and impartial humanitarian mandate of United Nations relief agencies represents a threat to a successful continuation of Operation Lifeline Sudan.
Calls upon the Government of Myanmar to respect fully the obligations of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, 33/ in particular the obligations in article 3 common to the Conventions,and to make use of such services as may be offered by impartial humanitarian bodies;
The Government should facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of impartial humanitarian relief for civilians, and all parties to the armed conflict should respect the prohibition of targeting civilians.
In accordance with the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, Member States should use their influence with parties to an armed conflict to strengthen compliance with international humanitarian law andrespect for the activities undertaken by impartial humanitarian organizations such as the ICRC[International Committee of the Red Cross].”(ibid., para. 157).
If this is not possible,then the occupying Power must allow access for impartial humanitarian organizations(ibid. arts. 23 and 59), but this does not in any way reduce the obligations of the occupying Power(ibid. art. 60).
(i) And all other parties to the hostilities in Myanmar to respect fully their obligations under international humanitarian law, including article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, to halt the use of weapons against the civilian population, to protect all civilians, including children, women and persons belonging to ethnic or religious minorities,from violations of humanitarian law and to avail themselves of services offered by impartial humanitarian bodies;
HRW recommended that the Government invite independent and impartial humanitarian agencies seeking to provide assistance to assess humanitarian needs and facilitate their unhindered access to civilians in need.
With respect to non-international armed conflicts, this can be seen in article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions,which states:" An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict".
An offer by a State, a group of States, an international organization or an impartial humanitarian body such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, of food or medical supplies to another State in whose territory the life or health of the population is seriously threatened cannot be considered an unlawful intervention in the internal affairs of that State.
It is recommended that, in accordance with the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, Member States should use their influence with parties to an armed conflict to strengthen compliance with international humanitarian law andrespect for the activities undertaken by impartial humanitarian organizations such as ICRC. For its part, the United Nations, and in particular those charged with preventive diplomacy and peacemaking tasks, will endeavour to make compliance with humanitarian law a central focus of its activities.
An offer by a State, a group of States, an international organization or an impartial humanitarian body such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, of food or medical supplies to another State in whose territory the life or health of the population is seriously threatened cannot be considered an unlawful intervention in the internal affairs of that State.
Outcome 5: humanitarian needs met,economic recovery and basic services provided(provide impartial humanitarian assistance; provide basic services on a recovery basis including health and education; strengthen existing and explore alternative livelihoods; involve business community in developing economy of peace).
An offer by a State, a group of States, an international organization or an impartial humanitarian body such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, of food or medical supplies to another State in whose territory the life or health of the population is seriously threatened, cannot be considered an unlawful intervention in the internal affairs of that State.[…]".
