Examples of using Multilateral verification in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
What is important is that it is a multilateral verification system.
Moreover, no multilateral verification mechanism has been envisaged in the aforementioned treaty.
(b) It would be subject to an appropriate and effective integrated multilateral verification system;
Many members concurred that multilateral verification was complex, costly and challenging to enforce.
(c) Consider and formulate possible new principles,concepts and methods of multilateral verification activities;
Many Board members also agreed that multilateral verification was complex, costly and challenging to enforce.
Overemphasizing the role of national technical means, in our view,is merely an attempt to undermine the multilateral verification system.
Hence the need to strengthen multilateral verification standards in IAEA.
The most effective way to move towards" global zero" was through auniversal legal instrument establishing a strict multilateral verification mechanism.
Still less are there any multilateral verification mechanisms relating to the elimination or dismantling of such weapons.
Those Members would need to submit this information as quickly as possible so as toallow sufficient time for the multilateral verification process.
Brazil favours an FMCT which includes a multilateral verification mechanism and stockpile controls.
An operational multilateral verification mechanism which will dispel concerns about breaches of its provisions is essential for achieving the objective in question.
States parties affirmed that the Convention sets new standardsfor both disarmament and non-proliferation through its non-discriminatory and multilateral verification regime.
We must strengthen the multilateral verification mechanisms and enable the International Atomic Energy Agency to make best use of its capacity.
Most, but not all, disarmament treaties, be they multilateral, plurilateral or bilateral,have provision for a multilateral verification regime to ascertain compliance.
In contrast, there are much stronger reasons to support multilateral verification(including a role for international organizations) in narrower issue-specific or region-specific contexts.
Effective verification should include a balance between technology and diplomacy, voluntary cooperation among the countries concerned,and a strong sense of ownership within multilateral verification organizations.
By providing a multilateral verification mechanism for this instrument, a climate of trust and transparency could be created among States parties with regard to compliance with the obligations undertaken.
Whereas the implementation of non-proliferation measures was subject to the IAEA multilateral verification regime, nuclear-disarmament measures were not subject to any verifiable multilateral regime.
The experience accumulated by UNSCOM while carrying out on-site inspections, aerial surveillance, as well as other verification-related activities,provides an important contribution to the establishment of a multilateral verification system.
Multilateral verification adds an additional element of trust, thanks to its independent and impartial nature, particularly in the case of countries that do not have the means for determining on their own whether or not the obligations of other States have been met.
We must also recognize the existence of an issue relating to the readiness or ability of some Member States to comply with their relevant treaty obligations,and persisting questions as to the ability of multilateral verification mechanisms to detect non-compliance.
It was also stressed that in order to be seen as legitimate, multilateral verification processes should be undertaken by independent experts, taking into account the due security interests of the States concerned, and in accordance with a set of internationally accepted global norms on verification. .
The United Kingdom announced[1] at the 2000 NPT Review Conference that it had just commenced a programme toconsider techniques that could be used in the multilateral verification of any future arrangement seeking to control, reduce and ultimately eliminate stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
In July, an intensive policy course entitled" Multilateral verification, collective security: the contribution of the CTBT" will examine in depth the Treaty ' s political aspects and legal implementation and provide an overview of technologies to monitor its implementation.
At the 2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons the United Kingdom announced[1] that it had recently commenced a programme toconsider technologies that could be used in the multilateral verification of any future arrangement to reduce and ultimately eliminate stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
Ghana participated in the online intensive policy course entitled" Multilateral verification, collective security: the contribution of the CTBT" held in Vienna as part of the Capacity Development Initiative of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization.
To this end,some States parties called for the earliest development of effective and credible multilateral verification arrangements, in the context of the IAEA, to ensure the irreversible removal of fissile material designated by each nuclear-weapon State as no longer required for military purposes.
Cooperation with States has also proved useful to multilateral verification bodies when the provision of information and data from national means has helped the latter to better pinpoint and refine their investigative work in verifying compliance with Security Council resolutions concerning weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.