Examples of using Nonlethal weapons in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Our first move will be tear gas and nonlethal weapons. .
One of those problems is: nonlethal weapons may be used indiscriminately.
And since we have alreadyhad so many problems with police use of nonlethal weapons in various ways.
So if they had nonlethal weapons, then they would say.
I started looking at stuff in Australia,knowing from my own experience of various times when nonlethal weapons have been introduced in Australia.
So if they had nonlethal weapons, then they would say,"We can use them in that sort of situation.
I'm talking about military uses of nonlethal weapons, so why is this relevant?
And there are other examples of the same sorts of things,where you think,"Is this really an appropriate way to use nonlethal weapons?".
Now, there's a whole range of different sorts of nonlethal weapons, some of which are available now, some of which they're developing.
And of course, being Australian, I started looking at stuff in Australia,knowing from my own experience of various times when nonlethal weapons have been introduced in Australia.
So I think yes, there may be ways that nonlethal weapons will be great in these situations, but there's also a whole heap of problems that need to be considered as well.
But I would remind you--I'm talking about military uses of nonlethal weapons, so why is this relevant?
So there's a whole range of different nonlethal weapons we could give military personnel, and there's a whole range of situations where they're looking at them and saying.
I was very surprised when I started to do this to see that, in fact,even the people who advocated the use of nonlethal weapons by the military hadn't actually done that.
Now one of the particular issues that comes up with military use of nonlethal weapons-- and people actually say,"There might be some problems"-- there's a couple of particular problems that get focused on.
I was very surprised when I started to do this to see that, in fact, even the people who advocated the use of nonlethal weapons by the military hadn't actually done that.
So one of the problems suggested with nonlethal weapons is that they might be used indiscriminately-- that you would use them against a whole range of people, because you don't have to worry so much anymore.
So their attitudes to the use of lethal force are very different,and I think it's fairly obvious that their attitude to the use of nonlethal weapons would also be very different from what it is with the police.
So there's a whole range of different nonlethal weapons we could give military personnel, and there's a whole range of situations where they're looking at them and saying,"These things would be really useful.".
Another problem I want to quickly mention is that there's a whole heap of problems with the waypeople are actually taught to use nonlethal weapons, and get trained about them and then tested and so on.
Now one of the particular issues that comes up with military use of nonlethal weapons-- and people actually say,"There might be some problems"-- there's a couple of particular problems that get focused on.
One particular thing that's come up that I am especially interested in, is the question of whether, when we're sending military personnel to do these sorts of jobs, we ought to be equipping them differently; and in particular,whether we ought to be giving them access to some of the nonlethal weapons that police have.
And since we have alreadyhad so many problems with police use of nonlethal weapons in various ways, I thought it would be a good idea to look at some of those things and relate it to the military context.
So the suggestion is, if we're going to send robots out and allow them to do this,maybe it would be a good idea if they were armed with nonlethal weapons, so if the robot makes a bad decision and shoots the wrong person, again, they haven't actually killed them.
A second problem people sometimes talk about with military use of nonlethal weapons-- and it's actually why, in the chemical weapons convention, it's very clear that you can't use riot-control agents as weapons of warfare-- is that it's seen that sometimes nonlethal weapons might be used not as an alternative to lethal force, but as a lethal force multiplier:that you use nonlethal weapons first, so your lethal weapons will actually be more effective.
Asked why the IDF reportedlyoften resorts to the use of live ammunition instead of nonlethal weapons, the IDF officers indicated that the military tactics being employed against them influenced the types of weapons the IDF could employ.
In other words, your perfect nonlethal weapon is something that's perfect for abuse.
Mclennen-forster were leading the way in developing a nonlethal weapon for the military.
When I'm talking to the police about what a perfect nonlethal weapon would look like, they almost inevitably say the same thing.
The last thing that I would like to say:When I'm talking to the police about what a perfect nonlethal weapon would look like, they almost inevitably say the same thing.