Examples of using Presentation differences in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Presentation differences.
Revenue that does not form part of the statement of comparison of budget andactual amounts are reflected as presentation differences.
Presentation differences.
Revenue and non fund relevant expenses that do not form part of the Statement of Comparison of Budget andActual Amounts are reflected as Presentation differences.
Presentation differences.
Revenue and non-fund relevant expenses that do not form part of the statement of comparison of budget andactual amounts are reflected as presentation differences.
Presentation differences.
As such the presentation differences in the reconciliation relate to revenue.
Presentation differences are those differences in the format and classification schemes used in the statement of cash flow and the statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts.
(f) Presentation differences.
Presentation differences are due to differences in the format and classification schemes adopted for presentation of statement of cash flow and statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts.
Presentation differences are due to differences in the format and classification schemes adopted for presentation of statement of cash flow and statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts.
Presentation differences are the result of differences in the format and classification schemes adopted for the presentation of the statement of cash flow and the statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts.
Presentation differences are differences in the format and classification schemes in the statement of cash flows and the statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts, which in this case are related primarily to the non-recording of income in statement V and the changes related to the cash pool.
(d) Presentation differences are due to differences in the format and classification schemes adopted for the presentation of the statement of financial performance(statement II) and the statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts(statement V). The UNHCR budget in statement V is presented on an operational and geographical basis, while expenses are presented by nature of expense in statement II.
(xi) Differences in presentation and comparisons with previous financial statements.
(iv) Differences in presentation and comparisons with previous biennium financial statements.
Analysis of the claims has revealed distinct differences in presentation. First Report, pp.
I understand that there are differences in the presentation forums and blogs.
The differences concerned not only the presentation but also the scope and content of the budget.
He commended the approach taken by the Committee in analysing the differences between the presentation of the budgets of the Rwanda and Yugoslavia Tribunals.
Given the manner in which the Second Assessment Report was drawn up,it is not surprising that considerable differences in style and presentation are evident throughout.
(d) Differences in presentation are due to differences in the format and classification schemes adopted for presentation of the statement of financial performance and statement of comparison of budget and actual amounts.
Annex III to the present report reflects the differences in accounting treatment, presentation and disclosure of the financial statements of the organizations audited by the Board.
The Board noted differences in the presentation of the statements(excluding statements I to III), schedules, notes and annexes in the financial statements of the 16 organizations audited, as highlighted in annex III to the present report.
There may also be differences in formats and classification schemes adopted for presentation of financial statements and the budget.
There may also be differences in formats and classification schemes adopted for presentation of financial statements and the budget.
The presentation in statements of programme budgetimplications will necessarily continue to reflect differences in the presentation of programme narratives in the proposed budget.
The presentation outlined methodological differences, e.g. with regard to parameters used in the estimation of carbon stocks in primary and secondary forests for the various biomass types to be considered(above-ground, below-ground biomass, etc.), detailing underlying allometric equations, which take into account knowledge on biomass and/or tree species, and the detailed estimation of corresponding uncertainties based on IPCC equations.