Examples of using Programme-budget implications in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
(Programme-Budget Implications in document A/C.2/ 51/L.36).
However, it had understood that the invitations had no programme-budget implications.
The programme-budget implications posed no problem because the money was available.
Mr. Khane(Secretary of the Committee) said that the programme-budget implications would not be available until the following day.
Mr. Zhang(Secretary of the Committee)said that none of the draft resolutions under the agenda item had programme-budget implications.
People also translate
The relevant statements of programme-budget implications would be submitted in due course.
His delegation would continue to request that theSecretariat should provide clear indications on the programme-budget implications of draft resolutions.
Mr. Khane(Secretary of the Committee), presenting a statement of programme-budget implications, said that his remarks concerned paragraphs 12, 13, 16 and 18 of the draft resolution.
The Chair invited the Committee to take action on draftresolution A/C.3/66/L.13/Add.1. The draft resolution contained no programme-budget implications.
The Chairman said that the draft resolution contained no programme-budget implications and that Andorra, Benin and South Africa wished to become sponsors.
Her delegation would like clarification of the matter, because the United States was notprepared to accept a decision of the Committee that had programme-budget implications.
Mr. Khane(Secretary of the Committee)said that the draft resolution would give rise to programme-budget implications that would not be available until the following day.
Ms. Astanah(Malaysia) asked whether the programme-budget implications of the draft resolution would also be discussed in the Fifth Committee, since she was not in a position to express herself on the matter.
The Chairman said he had beeninformed by the Secretariat that it did not anticipate any programme-budget implications arising from the draft resolution.
However, it was regrettable that there had been programme-budget implications because General Assembly resolution 61/158 had not been fully reflected in the proposed programme budget for 2008-2009.
The Chairman said that, while the Cuban proposal was practical, more than one daywould be needed for preparing the statement on the programme-budget implications of the further two invitations.
Mr. Cabral(Guinea-Bissau) said that the statement on programme-budget implications(A/C.3/58/L.84) was misleading: rather than containing the financial estimates required under rule 153 of the rules of procedure, it expressed the opinion of the Programme Planning and Budget Division.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on the draft resolution anddrew attention to document A/C.3/59/L.36 containing a statement of programme-budget implications of the draft resolution.
Ms. Abdul Aziz(Malaysia), referring to the Secretary ' s initial statement,said she was surprised that the programme-budget implications for the Chairman of the Working Group on the Right to Development differed from those for other mechanisms and that his travel expenses might have to be met from extrabudgetary funds.
Since 20 instruments of ratification or accession needed to be deposited before the Convention could enter into force,the draft resolution was not expected to have any programme-budget implications for the 2006-2007 biennium.
The programme-budget implications should be discussed in the Fifth Committee, taking into account the view expressed by the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(ACABQ) that the budget of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights did not allow for the full implementation of General Assembly resolution 61/158.
I should like to reiterate that additional time is needed for draft resolutions involving changes in the work programme oradditional expenditures since they will require the preparation by the Secretary-General of a statement of programme-budget implications.
The Chairperson, drawing attention to draft resolution A/C.3/55/L.70,said that it had no programme-budget implications, and recalled that when the text had been introduced the representatives of Bangladesh, Colombia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United States of America had requested that their countries should be added to the list of sponsors.
The Chairman announced that the delegations of Bangladesh, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Mali, Mongolia, Namibia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone had joined the sponsors of the draft resolution,and that it contained no programme-budget implications.
Mr. de Barros(Acting Secretary of the Committee)read out a statement concerning the programme-budget implications of the draft resolution. Pursuant to paragraph 2, the General Assembly would endorse the recommendations made by the Working Group on the future operations of the International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women(INSTRAW) and would request the Secretary-General to implement those recommendations.
In response to the United States, he said that, when the question of additional invitations had arisen initially,he had indicated that any new invitations would result in an assessment of programme-budget implications, although that did not necessarily mean that fresh funds would be required.
The Chairman said that the draft resolution contained no programme-budget implications and that the following countries wished to join the sponsors: Azerbaijan, Botswana, Colombia, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Liechtenstein, Madagascar, Malawi, Namibia, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Sao Tome and Principe, Swaziland, the United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.
Ms. Abdul Aziz(Malaysia) said that the invitation to the Special Rapporteur on disability should be treated on an equal footing with the other invitations; it should be possible to take adecision in principle on that question as well if the programme-budget implications could also be absorbed.
The Chairman said that the draft resolution contained no programme-budget implications and that the following countries had joined the sponsors: Argentina, Belarus, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Colombia, the Congo, Ecuador, Eritrea, Fiji, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kenya, the Lao People apos; s Democratic Republic, Liberia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nepal, Oman, Papua New Guinea, the Republic of Korea, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, Uruguay, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/57/L.30 entitled" Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment", and the United States amendment thereto in document A/C.3/57/L.39,and invited the Secretary to read out a statement on the programme-budget implications of the draft resolution.