Examples of using State party has not implemented in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The author submits that the State party has not implemented the Views and has not provided him with security.
On 10 February 2006, the author submits that the State party has not implemented the Committee ' s decision.
Please explain why the State party has not implemented the Committee ' s recommendation to raise without delay the minimum age of marriage to 18 years for both girls and boys(CEDAW/C/JAM/CO/5, para. 40).
Accordingly, the author reiterates his argument that the State party has not implemented the Williams Treaties in a way to ensure that the author is able to enjoy his culture.
The Committee notes that the State party has not implemented the decision of the African Commission on Human and Peoples ' Rights in the case Centre for Minority Rights Development(Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v. Kenya.(arts. 12, 17, 26 and 27).
(33) The Committee, while welcoming the adoption of the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003,regrets that the State party has not implemented its previous recommendation that legislation allowing male officers access to women ' s quarters should be amended to provide at least that they will always be accompanied by women officers.
In response to the authors ' comments that the State party has not implemented the international standards upon which it relies for the justification of the compulsory age retirementpolicy, the State party notes that while the ICAO standard referred to is not directly implemented in its law, it does conform with the standard where an Australian airline flies into or out of a country that complies with the standard.
Concern is expressed that the State party has not implemented the provisions contained in article 4(b) of the Convention.
The Committee is concerned that the State party has not implemented its previous recommendations:(a) to expressly criminalize in domestic legislation the recruitment and use in hostilities of persons under the age of 15 by the armed forces and armed groups(CRC/C/OPAC/ITA/CO/1, para. 12); and(b) to define" direct participation" in domestic legislation(CRC/C/OPAC/ITA/CO/1, para. 11), in line with articles 1 to 4 of the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict.
The Committee notes with concern that the State party has not implemented the recommendations made by the Truth Commission in 1993(arts. 2, 4, 5 and 14).
The Committee is concerned that the State party has not implemented the Committee ' s recommendations, and specifically the recommendation to provide appropriate compensation to Ms. A.S., to review its domestic legislation pertaining to the principle of informed consent and ensure its conformity with international human rights and medical standards, and monitor public and private health centres which perform sterilization procedures, as contained in its views under the Optional Protocol to the Convention in respect of communication No. 4/2004, Ms. A.S. v. Hungary.
On 12 February 2009, the author reiterates his allegation that the State party has not implemented the Views and states that since the Views were adopted nineteen other criminal cases have been heard by the court in Tizi-Ouzou.
The Committee regrets that the State party has not implemented the recommendations about the collection of disaggregated data in respect of children with disabilities.
The author submits that the State party has not implemented the Views and has not provided him with security.
The authors note that the State party has not implemented the international standards upon which they seek to rely in justifying the compulsory retirement policy.
Concern is expressed once again that the State Party has not implemented the provisions contained in article 4 of the Convention, which call for the enactment of specific penal legislation.
Concern is expressed once again that the State party has not implemented the provisions contained in article 4 of the Convention, which call for the adoption of specific penal legislation.
The Committee is concerned that the State party has not implemented the Committee ' s recommendation made in 2007 concerning the prohibition and criminalization of recruitment of children and their involvement in hostilities.
Concern is again expressed that the State party has not implemented the provisions contained in article 4(b) of the Convention and has not provided information on the practical implementation of provisions of article 4(c).
It is noted with concern that the State party has not implemented the provisions of article 4 of the Convention, which call for the adoption of positive measures and specific penal legislation to combat racial discrimination.
Concern is expressed once again that the State party has not implemented the provisions contained in article 4(b) of the Convention and has not provided information on the practical implementation of provisions of article 4.
(8) The Committee is concerned that the State party has not implemented the Committee ' s Views under the Optional Protocol in the cases of Gridin v. Russian Federation and Lantsov v. Russian Federation.
The Committee is also concerned that the State party has not implemented temporary special measures to accelerate women ' s representation in the field of employment, despite the fact that such measures are provided for in the State party ' s legislation(art. 3).
On 21 January 2001 the author visited OHCHR andinformed that the State party had not implemented the Committee ' s recommendations.
On 31 August 2006,the author again informed the Committee that the State party had not implemented the Decision.
On 28 February 2011, the author informed the Committee that the State party had not implemented the Committee ' s Views in the present case.
None On 27 February 2008, the author submitted that the State party had not implemented the Views.
On 11 March 2011, the author reported that the State party had not implemented the Committee ' s Views and that he was unable to hire a lawyer in order to assist him with the determination of the amount for the damages suffered.
It was stressed that the State party had not implemented the provisions of articles 4 and 6 of the Convention, which call for the adoption of positive measures to combat racial discrimination.
Peru: With regard to case No. 202/1986- Ato(A/44/40), the author informed the Committee by letters dated 1 October 1999 and15 March 2001 that the State party had not implemented the Views.