Examples of using The source notes in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The source notes that while in detention his health has deteriorated.
With regard to the right to adequate time andfacilities to prepare his defence, the source notes that the charges against Pastor Gong were extremely complex.
The source notes that the Government did not address the allegations of torture.
As regards Visalingam Gobidas 'revelations about Mr. Jayasundaram procuring high-powered communication sets, the source notes that this is a mere allegation unsubstantiated by evidence.
The source notes with concern the continued detention of Ariful Sheikh, a five-year-old minor.
Concerning the report of 2002 which led the National Assembly to the conclusion that the detainees have committed crimes, the source notes that State ' s political organs are not competent to establish guilt.
The source notes that the statement of the Government fails to address their key challenges in their communication.
As a final matter, the source notes that the detainees have now all been committed to stand trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria at a date yet to be fixed.
The source notes that the Government also affirmed that Mr. Al Bajadi was tried by the competent court of first instance.
In a further submission, the source notes that Mr. Atkinson was charged on 5 April 1998, and that he denied all charges of having paid unlawful commissions.
The source notes that the Government reply sets out two explanations in support of Guo Quan ' s conviction for" subversion of state power".
In the present case, the source notes that, two years after their arrest,the eight above-mentioned persons have still not been notified of the charges against them.
The source notes that the detainees have been held incommunicado since September 2001 at an unknown place and without any contact.
The source notes that Mr. Abdurakhmonov has now been in pretrial detention without access to a lawyer or to his family for over five months.
Finally, the source notes that all other allegations of violations of applicable international human rights norms have not been disputed by the Government.
The source notes that the examination was scheduled 21 days after Mr. Mammadov had been sentenced to pretrial detention on drug-related charges.
The source notes that, contrary to the provisions of the law,the petitioners are being detained in a political prison camp, not a labour re-education camp.
The source notes that this date is based on the assumption that Mr. Abdi would have been granted parole on 28 May 2002, however, it may be that it was not.
The source notes that the Government fails to explain the authority or jurisdiction, and the imputed facts pursuant to which Mr. Al- Qahtani has been convicted.
The source notes that article 2 of the Law of Criminal Procedure stipulates that" detention or imprisonment… shall be for the period prescribed by a competent authority".
The source notes that the content of his" weekly letters" is an indicator of his legalist and pacifist battle against arbitrariness and for the establishment of the rule of law.
The source notes that, according to the Criminal Procedure Code, detainees have to be brought before a judge to rule on their continued detention no later than 72 hours after their arrest.
The source notes that Mr. Al-Maleh holds no military status and was convicted for a crime which has no military nature:" disseminating false information which could harm the nation"(art. 287 of the Penal Code).
The source notes that Mr. Samaali refused to sign certain statements, although he agreed to sign others under threat of violence, as he had even been refused a medical examination for fear that it might reveal the marks of an assault.
The source notes that the Syrian authorities made no mention of the period of more than two years he spent in incommunicado detention or of any investigations carried out into the quite detailed reports of torture that he had suffered from.
The source notes that the rights of all four defendants were fully protected during the trial and appeal, but it considers that the response does not adequately or specifically address the subsequent arrest of Mr. Jin and Mr. Zhang.
The source notes that the reason that their previous habeas corpus case failed was that Atty Pormento did not do his due diligence and the case was submitted to and heard in the wrong court(RCT Branch 109, Pasay).
The source notes that this law was the subject of numerous recommendations for amendment or abolishment during the second cycle of the Universal Periodic Review(UPR) of the United Arab Emirates that took place in January 2013.
The source notes article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, whereby" in the determination of any criminal charge against him… everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law".
Moreover, the source notes that the Government did not clarify why, after being acquitted, Mr. Aly was not released and why, on the contrary, the Ministry of Justice appointed an investigating judge to conduct more investigations and reopened the case.