Examples of using Total external in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Economies in transition: total external debt.
Rebuild Total external costs in Eurom.
This then was a limitation on debt service and on total external indebtedness.
Figure III-3: TOTAL EXTERNAL DEBT OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR.
People also translate
In turn, and in line with improved government accountability,donors will make more effort to increase the share of total external assistance to Afghanistan that goes to the core budget.
The decision was made, however, to use total external debt data given its greater availability and the lack of distinction between public and private debt data.
At the time the adjustment was introduced, limitations in data availability on debtrepayment led the Committee to base it on a proportion of the total external debt stock of the Member States concerned.
The table below presents the evolution of total external debt of the public sector, with a breakdown of creditors.
The total external debt of developing countries in 2005 is estimated at $2.8 trillion, an increase of 1.6 per cent as compared with 2004(the lowest rate of growth since 2000).
That process appears to have accelerated in 2004, and total external debt is estimated at some $6.6 billion.
Cost/time estimate: Total external costs of at least Euro10 million(Euro1 to 1.5 million annually) plus internal capacity for the whole duration.
Similar developments were felt in sub-Saharan Africa during 1997,where total external debt also fell by 2 per cent($4.6 billion) to $223 billion.
For that purpose, it was assumed that external debt was repaid over a period of eight years, so thatthe adjustment to the GNI data was 12.5 per cent of total external debt stock per year.
Six GDDS countries are also disseminating their total external debt position data according to the prescribed SDDS format.
Limitations in the availability of data on principal payments on debt at the time the adjustment was introducedled the Committee to base the adjustment on a proportion of the total external debt stock of the Member States concerned.
As a result ofthese debt-relief initiatives, sub-Saharan Africa ' s total external debt stock dropped from US$ 241.2 billion in 2005 to US$ 202.1 billion in 2006.
The Committee also recalled that limitations in the availability of data on principal payments on debt at the time the adjustment wasintroduced led it to base the adjustment on a proportion of the total external debt stock of the Member States concerned.
For instance, as of 30 June 1994 Uganda had a total external public sector debt of $2.99 billion- over 80 per cent of estimated gross domestic product for the 1993-1994 financial year.
They noted that data availability constraints are no longer atechnical obstacle to using public rather than total external debt data or switching from the debt-stock to the debt-flow approach.
Despite their resilience, the total external debt of developing countries had increased, raising concern about debt sustainability and posing a significant threat to progress in developing countries.
As gross national income(GNI) in nominal dollar terms for the group of developing countries as a whole was growing at a rate far exceeding 1.6 per cent in 2005,the ratio of total external debt to GNI would be below 34 per cent, the level reached in 2004.
The Committee decided, however, to use total external debt rather than public debt because of the greater availability of data and the lack of distinction between public and private debt in the data available.
There were two main issues to consider in relation to the functioning of the debt-burden adjustment: first, whether to use public and publicly guaranteed external debt data orto continue to use total external debt; and second, whether to base the adjustment on debt flow or to continue to use debt stock.
Total external assistance in 1996 is estimated at about $1.8 billion, a 9 per cent decline over the 1995 total; of that 1996 total, donor countries directly contributed about $1.2 billion and development banks $518 million, while private foundations increased their assistance in 1996 to $140 million.
There were two main issues to consider in relation to the functioning of the debt-burden adjustment: first,whether to use total external debt or only public and publicly guaranteed external debt data; and second, whether to base the adjustment on debt stock or debt flow.
Meanwhile, their total external debt increased moderately from 21.2 per cent to 22.3 per cent of GDP during the same time span(figure III). While these overall numbers are relatively low in historical terms and the debt sustainability of middle-income countries can be characterized as encouraging, the debt situation remains problematic in a number of middle-income countries.
In reviewing this element, the Committee noted that there were two main issues to consider in relation to the functioning of the element:(a) whether to use public and publicly guaranteed external debt data orto continue to use total external debt; and(b) whether to base the debt-burden adjustment on debt flow or to continue to use debt stock.
Consequently, two issues that have been raised in relation to the current methodology of the debt-burden adjustment can be addressed using thecurrently available data, namely:(a) whether to use total external debt data or to only use public and publicly guaranteed external debt data; and(b) whether to base the adjustment on the debt-stock or the debt-flow approach.
Consequently, there are two issues related to the current methodology of the debt-burden adjustment that have been raised that can now be addressed using thecurrently available data:(a) whether to use total external debt data or to use only public and publicly guaranteed external debt data; and(b) whether to base the adjustment on the debt-stock or the debt-flow approach.