What is the translation of " SPECULATIVE EXECUTION " in Chinese?

• 推测性执行
• 投机性执行

Examples of using Speculative execution in English and their translations into Chinese

Speculative execution.
推测执行.

Every modern processor performs a certain amount of speculative execution.
每个现代处理器都执行一定的推测执行。

Speculative execution side-channel vulnerabilities require an industry response.
推测性执行攻击渠道漏洞需要行业响应。

Every modern processor performs a certain amount of speculative execution.
每个现代处理器都执行一定数量的推测运行。

This is known as speculative execution, and it is the heart of these vulnerabilities.
这就是所谓的投机执行，它是这些弱点的核心。

Kroah-Hartman explained that Intel has documented in its patents how speculative execution works.
克鲁阿-哈特曼解释说，英特尔在其专利中记录了投机性执行的工作原理。

Spectre and Meltdown attack speculative execution in different ways.
Spectre和Meltdown以不同的方式攻击推测式执行。

There is a lot of speculation today regarding a potential security issue related to modern microprocessors and speculative execution.
近日有媒体报道了潜在的有关现代微处理器和推测执行的安全性问题。

This is known as speculative execution, and it is the heart of these vulnerabilities.
这就是所谓的Speculative_execution，也是这些漏洞的核心所在。

There are three primary variants of the issue which differ in the way the speculative execution can be exploited.
这个问题有三种主要的变体，它们的不同之处在于投机的执行可以被利用。

Intel disclosed a speculative execution side-channel attack method called L1 Terminal Fault(L1TF).
安全研究人员发现一种投机执行侧信道攻击方法被称为L1TerminalFault(L1TF)。

The flaws result from the way computers try to guess what users are likely to do next, a process called speculative execution.
这种缺陷是计算机试图猜测用户下一步可能做什么的一种方式，这个过程称为推测性执行。

AMD Radeon GPU architectures do not use speculative execution and thus are not susceptible to these threats.
AMDRadeonGPU架构不采用推测性执行技术，因而不易被这些威胁影响。

The company stated that it informed the chip makers of the issue, which is caused by a process known as“speculative execution.”.
该公司表示，该公司向芯片制造商通报了这一问题，这是一个被称为“投机性执行”的过程造成的。

If the prediction was wrong, this speculative execution is rolled back in a way that is meant to be invisible to software.
如果预测是错误的，这种推测性执行将以一种软件不可见的方式回滚。

The errors result from the way computers try to guess what the user is likely to happen next, a process known as speculative execution.
这种缺陷是计算机试图猜测用户下一步可能做什么的一种方式，这个过程称为推测性执行。

This issue is not reliant on speculative execution, and is therefore unrelated to Spectre, Meltdown or L1 Terminal Fault.
这个问题不依赖于预测执行，因此与此前发现的‘幽灵'或‘熔断'或L1终端故障无关。

Meltdown, Spectre, and Foreshadow have shown how various CPU components leak data during the speculative execution process.
Meltdown，Spectre和Foreshadow展示了各种CPU组件在推测执行过程中如何泄漏数据。

My results demonstrate that speculative execution does indeed continue despite violations of the isolation between kernel mode and user mode.
我的结果表明，推测执行确实继续，尽管违反了内核模式和用户模式之间的隔离。

Security researchers from MIT claim to have devised a hardware solution to prevent cache timing attacks based on speculative execution, such as Spectre and Meltdown.
麻省理工学院的安全研究人员声称已经设计出一种硬件解决方案来防止基于推测执行的缓存定时攻击，例如幽灵党和熔解。

Speculative execution improves processor speed by operating on multiple instructions at once- possibly in a different order than when they entered the CPU.
推测性执行通过一次操作多个指令来提高速度-并使它们进入CPU时的顺序不同。

The strategy helped them catch as many variants as possible of the speculative execution vulnerabilities that emerged in a slow trickle throughout 2018.
这一策略帮助他们尽可能多地捕捉到Speculative_execution漏洞的变体，这些漏洞在整个2018年缓慢出现。

Speculative execution is a core component of modern processors design that speculatively executes instructions based on assumptions that are considered likely to be true.
推测执行是核心组件现代处理器的设计是基于被认为可能是真实的假设推测性地执行指令。

An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions(a commonly used performance optimization).
处理器漏洞这是一个全行业的问题，许多现代的微处理器设计都实现了对指令的推测执行(一种常用的性能优化)。

Throughout 2018, researchers inside and outside Intel continued to find exploitable weaknesses related to Meltdown and Spectre class of"speculative execution" vulnerabilities.
整个2018年，英特尔内内外外的研究人员，都在继续发现与这类“Speculative_execution”漏洞相关的可以利用的弱点。

CVE-2018-3665, also known as Floating Point Lazy State Save/Restore, is another speculative execution vulnerability that affects some commonly deployed modern microprocessors.
CVE-2018-3665，也被称为LazyFP状态保存/恢复，是另一个推测执行漏洞，影响了一些常用的现代微处理器。

The Intel Atom, released in 2008, is the first Intel product to feature 2-way SMT(marketed as Hyper-Threading) without supporting instruction reordering, speculative execution, or register renaming.
发布于2008年的英特尔Atom是英特尔首个实现双路SMT特性（市场名“超线程”）而不支持指令重排序、推测执行和寄存器重命名的产品。

An industry-wide issue was found with the manner in which many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions(a commonly used performance optimization).
处理器漏洞这是一个全行业的问题，许多现代的微处理器设计都实现了对指令的推测执行(一种常用的性能优化)。