Examples of using To asylum in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
They demand the right to asylum.
The Member States have their own traditions with regard to asylum and this difference should not be overlooked within the framework of the aforementioned coordination.
You have no right to asylum.
The European Council will address strategic issues relating to asylum, migration and Schengen; building on the conclusions adopted by the Justice and Home Affairs Council of 9 June 2011.
But it isn't relevant to asylum.
People also translate
Also, in relation to asylum, the Frontex operations are being maintained, and work is being done on a European programme for refugees and on the resettlement of refugees, and also with some countries on repatriation programmes.
Give them the right to asylum Set free.
Her cousin will pickup in Iowa and take her to asylum.
Thus, if Mr Maroni's practices were put into effect,the migrants would probably not have the right to asylum since they would immediately be deported directly from Lampedusa in accordance with the wishes of the Italian Government.
Father, I beseech the right to asylum.
This means that while it is doubtlessly necessary to respect immigrants' right to asylum, it is likewise imperative to persevere in our efforts to put a stop once and for all to this tragedy which is taking place in the Mediterranean.
It helps improve the implementation of a European system on the right to asylum.
Father, I beseech the right to asylum. Asylum! Asylum! .
Then there is this: some are arrested andwill not be entitled to asylum.
Translated into legal terms, this means ensuring protection and the right to asylum for those fleeing starvation, war and persecution, and preventing their expulsion to countries where their lives are in danger or they risk inhumane treatment.
I hope that their fundamental human rights will be safeguarded,along with their right to asylum.
Even the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees,which according to the Treaty of Amsterdam should be consulted on all matters relating to asylum and immigration dealt with by the European Commission, is telling us not to adopt this directive.
I believe that all Member States should be obliged fully to respect the principle of non-refusal and the right to asylum.
I therefore welcome the adoption of this proposal, which has ended up with a Manichaean interpretation of this problem,acknowledging that the right to asylum is a fundamental right and must be treated fairly and equitably by the Member States.
In addition to measures aimed at controlling the influx of illegal immigrants, FRONTEX should also contribute to strengthening a global partnership with third countries andbe responsible for making certain decisions concerning the right to asylum.
We are only talking about administrative costs, without counting the costs for the asylum seekers themselves,both those who are entitled to asylum and those whose claims are ultimately denied for the right or wrong reasons.
This does not mean that decisions and requests freely expressed by individuals, specifically for asylum in Portugal, cannot be considered within a framework of respect for national sovereignty, the Portuguese Constitution and international law,including the right to asylum.
It also specifies that NGOs can play an active role in providing services, giving information on procedures for obtaining protection andoffering guidance and advice to asylum seekers which should be supplied at border crossings or in reception centres.
Certainly, I would have liked the mandate of this Office to be more ambitious and to be the instrument through which compulsory solidarity between the MemberStates is finally established, so as to put an end to the lottery of the right to asylum.
It is time for the international community and the European Union to say'Enough!';it is time for some straight talking about the guarantee of the right to asylum everywhere; and it is time for some governments to reconsider their illusory return policies.
We must also examine the problem of the detention of asylum seekers and, quite clearly, we must do this within the framework of a review of these texts, not necessarily to move away from the Dublin system butto perfect this European response to asylum seekers.
It is obviously good to improve the operations of Frontex, but if we really want to help the countries of southern Europe,then we must move towards harmonising the right to asylum, review the Dublin Convention and, most of all, finally draw up a genuine immigration policy.
This abuse of the right to asylum, contrary to the Geneva Convention, is not mentioned at any point in the report, and with good reason: it is convenient to make the'white man' feel guilty by reminding him that he was a terrible colonialist and that he now needs to pay for that in every sense of the word.
As well as doing that- as some have said- we cannot ignore our duties in relation to asylum and to international law.
All the asylum-related reports voted on today offer a lax andextensive interpretation of the right to asylum that is ultimately detrimental to those who are in genuine need of international protection, in order to save their lives, their physical integrity and their freedom.