Examples of using Need rules in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
We need rules.
If we're gonna keep going, and we're getting stronger, we need rules.
Kids need rules.
We need rules to safeguard the free market and to provide protection against monopolistic situations.
I love you, but you need rules and lemons and boundaries.
People also translate
We need rules so that Europe can benefit from open societies and open markets.
I'm serious. I love you, but you need rules and lemons and boundaries.
We need rules, right?
If different markets are to become integrated, if different social systems wish toenter into competition with one another in important areas, then we need rules.
I need rules, Doc.
However, this also means that we have to find the right balance between cutting bureaucracy and preventing fraud which, in turn,means that we need rules that are appropriate.
We need rules. Matt's right.
I said at Camp David that just as open societies need the rule of law, legal rules, in the same way,the markets also need rules in order to be legitimate, credible and ethical.
We need rules that are appropriate for SMEs.
I supported this report by voting in favour because I believe that we need rules during the transitional period to ensure legal certainty and avoid conflicts and gaps in the law.
We need rules for a free energy market shared by our Russian and Ukrainian partners.
Free markets constitute the basis for the functioning of successful economies, butfree markets need rules and compliance, and rules and compliance need to be tightened if irresponsible behaviour puts at risk what cannot and should not be at risk.
We need rules which apply across the board, which provide scope for all the fields of interest in Europe to be developed.
Therefore as one of the MEPs concerned, the question in my mind is this, and I put it to you on behalf of my committee and on behalf of this plenary as well:Do we need rules in areas where competition is not distorted and where the functioning of the internal market is not affected?
We need rules on the font, line thickness, contrast, etc. We need binding guidelines on legibility.
As the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs' rapporteur on the REACH programme, I can do no other than reiterate the demand made in the working paper:if there is to be comparability, we need rules made by the European Union, and, in the same way, rules laid down as standards by the WTO.
Open economies also need rules- the rules of transparency, sensible regulation and sensible supervision.
In other words, if we assume that those different social systems- whether socialist, liberal or otherwise- will not harmonize overnight, but will retain their different political complexions,whilst wishing to create a common market, then we need rules to prevent that competition from becoming unfair.
That is why we will, in future, also need rules covering how fuel and engine oil are to be made safer even on double hull tankers.
I have thoroughly considered all the arguments of the stakeholders and voted in favour of the compromise package, which bears the distinctive imprint of the European Parliament,since I am convinced that we need rules in order to know more about the thirty thousand chemical substances in the products that surround us in our everyday lives.
We therefore need rules, but rules that are effective; not overregulation, of course, but a genuine framework that is suited to European competitiveness.
Certainly, it is said that we need rules to reduce the risks of speculation, but there is no idea of intervening with regard to this financial speculation- for instance with a Tobin Tax on transactions- and we are not touching the Stability Pact that, in this time of recession, is likely to dramatically worsen lives in this continent of ours.
Instead, the strategy states that the market needs rules if it is to meet its social and environmental responsibilities.
The world also needs rules and standards; competition alone is not enough, although our main aim with the WTO process is the more efficient organisation of trade.
You are likely to be resentful of limits right now, and may be particularly angry if youhave to compromise or adjust to someone else's needs, rules or schedule.