Examples of using Right to defend itself in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Every nation has a right to defend itself.
We will in no way interrupt your plans, but Russian federation reserves the right to defend itself.
Every country has the right to defend itself against terrorists.
It is quite clear that the State of Israel has a right to defend itself.
Cuba has the right to defend itself against imperialism and counter-revolution, and this is not a children's game.
Finally every nation has a right to defend itself.
Reserves the right to defend itself against claims based on the existing rules on advertising and copyright or other intellectual property rights protect.
The Soviets have every right to be there, andCuba has every right to defend itself against the United States.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki has publicly condemned Hamas's"indiscriminate rocket attacks" andhas affirmed US support for Israel's right to defend itself.
Mitt Romney: We recognize Israel's right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with you.
It has been subjected to the most horrendous external and internal terrorism and, in consequence,it undoubtedly has the right to defend itself.
There is no doubt in my mind that Israel has the right to defend itself against violence and terror, by military means if necessary.
Once we are in this Parliament, however, Parliament constitutes a body in its own right, with its own personality, with the right to defend itself.
For instance, a balance must be struck between a state's right to defend itself against terrorist action and the need to ensure civil rights for prisoners.
Obama said that his administration had"absolutely not" given its blessing for an Israeli attack on Iranand,that although Israel had the right to defend itself, U.S.
I believe that everybody in this House recognises Israel's legitimate right to defend itself, but it would have been no bad thing for the United Nations to have condemned this tragic event.
Although Semites are of diverse national origins and religions, the Zionists have been successful in convincing many that“anti-Semitic” is exclusively prejudice against the Jewish peoples andopposition to Israel's right to defend itself from its“enemies.”.
Yes, Israel has a right to defend itself against indiscriminate attacks on civilians, but it has a duty as a democracy to be more just than its disposable power implies.
Nothing comes for free, however, andindustry is therefore right to defend itself against higher costs.
While I recognise that Israel has the right to defend itself against attack, many of us saw the documentary on Gaza yesterday and listened to our colleagues who had recently visited the region.
In May 2009, Israeli Prime Minister, Netanyahu visited Obama in Washington andstated that Israel had a right to defend itself against a nuclear Iran- which Obama and Joe Biden did not object to. .
Every country has the right to defend itself, but that does not entitle it to use unreasonable force on a large scale or take the sort of action witnessed in Beit Hanoun.
Without prejudice to the provisions in the preceding paragraphs,Borges ESEBE Inversiones(S.L.U.) reserves the right to defend itself against claims based on the existing rules on advertising and copyright or other intellectual property rights protect.
This, at least, is the impression that many in Jerusalem were left with after Netanyahu's visit to Washington last May, when neither Obama norSecretary of Defense Robert Gates contradicted Netanyahu's assertion that Israel has a right to defend itself from an Iranian nuclear threat.
I support without reservation Israel's right to defend itself, but such defence has to be within accepted international law and the responsibilities an occupying power takes upon itself when it invades another country.
Obama said that his administration had"absolutely not" given its blessing for an Israeli attack on Iranand,that although Israel had the right to defend itself, U.S. officials had emphasized the need to avoid"major conflict in the Middle East."[27] Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said"The window of negotiation is a very narrow.
This is not about denying Israel the right to defend itself against terrorism, but about our strongest condemnation and rejection of excessive courses of action that really have nothing to do with counter-terrorism.
We would urge the IMF also to act vigorously in this regard because,although each State has a right to defend itself against terrorism, what we observe in Chechnya is grossly disproportionate to the scale of the perceived threat and we have to deplore and condemn it at every opportunity.
The European Union has always recognised Israel's right to defend itself, but security does not consist solely of preventing terrorists from carrying out their abhorrent attacks; first and foremost, it is a matter of winning the people's hearts and minds.
Although the European Union recognises Israel's legitimate right to defend itself, it also underscores the need for the Israeli authorities to carefully weigh the implications and consequences of its decisions on the life of the people of Gaza.