Examples of using The answer to the first question in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
What's the answer to the first question?-Yes.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, the answer to the first question is.
The answer to the first question is an obvious"yes.
In the event of the Court not agreeing with the answer to the first question suggested above, I propose that it reply to. .
If the answer to the first question is in the negative.
Accordingly the answer to the first question was as follows.
The answer to the first question is that it is profitable, because export subsidies can be paid when animals are sent from the EU to a third country.
In view of the reservation formulated to the answer to the first question, it is necessary to answer the second question. .
The answer to the first question must therefore be that Article 2(2) of Directive 93/36 is independent in scope from the provisions of Directive 92/50.
Having regard to all of the foregoing considerations, the answer to the first question must be that Article 4(6) of the Framework Decision is to be interpreted as meaning that.
The answer to the first question, however, is something you can not know immediately when a casino is brand new and it's really the only downside to try a newer online casino.
President-in-Office of the Council.- The answer to the first question by the honourable Member is'yes', particularly because we need to discuss these issues.
If the answer to the first question is negative, could the bona fide buying commission be deductible from the declared transaction value bearing in mind the provisions of Articles 32(3) and 33 of the Customs Code?
Having regard to all of those considerations, the answer to the first question must be that Article 25 EC is to be construed as precluding a statutory rule under which.
Given the answer to the first question, there is no need to consider the second question. .
ANDRIESSEN(NL).- The answer to the first question is again in the affirmative.
Given that the answer to the first question is in the affirmative,the third question referred by the national court no longer requires an answer. .
In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the first question must be that Article 33(1) of the Sixth Directive is to be interpreted as not precluding an excise duty.
The answer to the first question submitted by the national court must therefore be that Article 21 of the Convention must be interpreted as applying irrespective of the domicile of the parties to the two sets of proceedings.
In view of the answer to the first question, the Court did not rule on the second question. .
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, does an importer have the choice betweenthe normal price referred to in the abovementioned Article 1 and the price paid or payable referred to in the abovementioned Article 9?
In the light of the answer to the first question, I propose that the Court answer the second question as follows.
The answer to the first question is usually referring to the Teutonic takeover of the sinking Roman Empire's splendours and the literary reports on the late Roman emperor's attempts to keep the barbarians away by purchase.
In the light of the answer to the first question, the second question must also be answered in the affirmative.
The answer to the first question must therefore be that Directive 69/335 is to be interpreted as preventing a tax from being levied on the capitalisation by a capital company of undistributed profits, such as the tax at issue in the main proceedings.
For all of the above reasons, I propose that the answer to the first question should be that Article 3(1) of the Regulation, read in conjunction with Article 3(2) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that a milk product in which the natural milk fat has been replaced with vegetable fat cannot be described using the designation'cheese.
If the answer to the first question is in the negative, may the value for customs purposes be determined, in the present case, on the basis of the prices charged to distributors or to certain other customers, it being understood that these prices may vary according to the commercial level of the buyers?
I am afraid that the answer to the first question is:'No, we shall not achieve the declared aims', and that all experience goes to show that the answer to the second question, of whether the means will compromise the ends, is unfortunately'yes.
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is the incompatibility with Community law of such a requirement, which is a provision of domestic law,to be taken into account by the national court in proceedings concerning the approval of a contribution by the interconnected network operator?