What is the translation of " THE ANSWER TO THE FIRST QUESTION " in Slovenian?

• odgovor na prvo vprašanje
• na prvo vprašanje odgovoriti
• na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti
• odgovora na prvo vprašanje
• odgovoru na prvo vprašanje

Examples of using The answer to the first question in English and their translations into Slovenian

The answer to the first question: no.
Odgovor na izhodiščno vprašanje: NE.

In the event of the Court not agreeing with the answer to the first question suggested above, I propose that it reply to..
Če se Sodi�če ne bo strinjalo z zgornjim odgovorom na prvo vpra�anje, predlagam, naj odgovori na drugo vpra�anje tako, da se.

The answer to the first question is: the waterways!
Odgovor na uvodno vprašanje je torej: vode!

Compensation will be provided by the state for crimes committed after 30 June 2005 that fall within the categories specified in the answer to the first question.
Država zagotovi odškodnino za kazniva dejanja, storjena po 30. juniju 2005, ki spadajo v kategorije, navedene v odgovoru na prvo vprašanje.

However, it follows from the answer to the first question that such a child cannot fall under that definition.
Iz odgovora na prvo vprašanje pa izhaja, da tak otrok ne spada v okvir tega pojma.

Consequently, the second question, relating to the effect of the failure to transpose Directive 2006/24 into Swedish law on the answer to the first question, becomes irrelevant.
Zato drugo vprašanje, ki se nanaša na posledico neopravljenega prenosa Direktive 2006/24 v švedsko pravo, po odgovoru na prvo vprašanje ni več relevantno.

It follows from the answer to the first question that a national competition authority cannot take a decision stating that there has been no breach of Article 102 TFEU.
Iz odgovora na prvo vprašanje je razvidno, da nacionalni organ, pristojen za konkurenco, ne more sprejeti odločbe o ugotovitvi neobstoja kršitve člena 102 PDEU.

Having regard to all of the foregoing considerations, the answer to the first question must be that Article 4(6) of the Framework Decision is to be interpreted as meaning that:.
Glede na vse navedeno je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba člen 4, točka 6, Okvirnega sklepa razlagati tako, da:.

The answer to the first question must therefore be that Article 31 of the Framework Decision must be interpreted as referring only to the situation in which the European.
Zato je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba člen 31 Okvirnega sklepa razlagati tako, da se nana�a le na primer, v katerem se uporablja sistem evropskega naloga.

Thus, in the case of the Dereci family, it is not apparent, as far as I can see, that the answer to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling would be the same if certain factual circumstances were different.
Zato po mojem mnenju v zvezi z družino Dereci še vedno ni očitno, da bi bil odgovor na prvo vprašanje za predhodno odločanje enak, če bi bile nekatere dejanske okoliščine drugačne.

(2) If the answer to the first question is to the effect that the benefit referred to is an unemployment benefit within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71:.
Če bi bilo treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je zadevna dajatev dajatev za brezposelnost v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe �t. 1408/71:.

Having regard to all of those considerations, the answer to the first question must be that Article 25 EC is to be construed as precluding a statutory rule under which.
Glede na vse navedeno je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba člen 25 ES razlagati tako, da nasprotuje zakonskemu ukrepu, na podlagi katerega morajo domači.

(32) The answer to the first question, as proposed, in essence, in points 33 to 36 of the present View, will also reduce the legal uncertainty created by Ruiz Zambrano.
(32) Z odgovorom na prvo vprašanje, kot je v bistvu predlagan v točkah od 33 do 36 tega stališča, se bo zmanjšala tudi pravna negotovost v zadevi Ruiz Zambrano.

In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the first question must be that Article 33(1) of the Sixth Directive is to be interpreted as not precluding an excise duty, such as.
Glede na navedeno je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba člen 33(1) Šeste direktive razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje tro�arini, kakr�na je bila na Poljskem.

Consequently, the answer to the first question is that Article 13(1)(b) of Regulation No 510/2006 must be interpreted as meaning that a registered name may be evoked through the use of figurative signs.
Zato je treba na prvo vprašanje odgovoriti, da je treba člen 13(1)(b) Uredbe št. 510/2006 razlagati tako, da je omemba registriranega imena lahko posledica uporabe figurativnih znakov.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is Article 5(1)(b) of that regulation applicable in determining the place of performance of the obligation at issue in the first question?'?
Če je odgovor na prvo vprašanje nikalen, ali se za določitev kraja izpolnitve obveznosti v primeru iz prvega vprašanja uporablja člen 5(1)(b) navedene uredbe?

(3) If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative and the answer to the second question in the negative, can the disclaimer even so affect the global assessment in any other way?'?
Če je odgovor na prvo vprašanje pritrdilen, na drugo pa nikalen, ali lahko odklonitev kljub temu kakor koli drugače vpliva na celovito presojo?

In the light of that case-law, the answer to the first question involves, first, the determination of whether designs are, in general, capable of being classified as‘works', within the meaning of Directive 2001/29.
Ob upoštevanju te sodne prakse je treba za odgovor na prvo vprašanje na prvem mestu ugotoviti, ali je mogoče modele na splošno opredeliti kot„dela“ v smislu Direktive 2001/29.

(angel) The answer to the first question, suggested by the second, which is the reply of the teacher to the pupil, contains in a single phrase one of the most essential truths of occult philosophy.
(a) Odgovor na prvo vprašanje, na katerega namiguje drugo, ki je učiteljev odgovor učencu, vsebuje v enem samem stavku eno od najbolj bistvenih resnic okultne filozofije.

(2) Is it relevant to the answer to the first question that, at the time when the capital goods were produced or acquired, the municipality's intention to use those goods in future to carry out taxable transactions was not indicated clearly?
Ali je za odgovor na prvo vprašanje pomembno, da občina ob izdelavi oziroma pridobitvi investicijskega blaga ni izrecno povedala, da ga namerava v prihodnje uporabljati za obdavčljive transakcije?

The answer to the first question is therefore that, after the entry into force of Regulation No 883/2004, the provisions of Article 65 of that regulation are not to be interpreted in the light of the judgment in Miethe.
Zato je treba na prvo vprašanje odgovoriti, da se po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe št. 883/2004 določb člena 65 te uredbe ne sme razlagati glede na zgoraj navedeno sodbo Miethe.

The answer to the first question should therefore be that the CN must be interpreted as meaning that a sandal such as that in question in the main proceedings, with an outer sole of rubber, whose upper is made up of two leather sections glued to the..
Zato je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba KN razlagati tako, da se sandala, kot je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, z zunanjim podplatom iz gume, katere zgornji del.

The answer to the first question should therefore be that the decision by which a Member State decides to exercise the option conferred on it by Article 17(1) of Regulation No 604/2013 is a matter which comes within the scope of EU law.
Zato je treba na prvo vprašanje odgovoriti, da spada odločitev države članice, da bo uporabila možnost, ki ji jo daje člen 17(1) Uredbe št. 604/2013, na področje uporabe prava Unije.

Having regard to the foregoing, the answer to the first question must be that, for the purposes of applying Directive 2000/76, where a co-generation plant comprises a number of boilers, each boiler and its associated equipment is to be regarded as constituting a separate plant.
Glede na navedeno je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba pri uporabi Direktive 2000/76, ko ima toplarna več kotlov, vsak kotel ter pripadajočo opremo obravnavati kot ločeno napravo.

Does the answer to the first question differ in circumstances where the transfer of shares to the clearance service was required in order to facilitate a listing of the company in question on a stock exchange in that member state or another member state?
Ali je odgovor na prvo vprašanje drugačen v okoliščinah, v katerih je bil prenos delnic v okviru klirinške družbe zahtevan, da se omogoči uvrstitev zadevne družbe na borzo v navedeni ali drugi državi članici?

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is it of any importance that, during the proceedings before the courts, the liquidator transfers the claim at issue to a company which enters the proceedings in the place of the liquidator?
Če je odgovor na prvo vprašanje pritrdilen, ali je pomembno, da stečajni upravitelj med postopkom pred sodišči sporno terjatev odstopi družbi, ki vstopi v postopek namesto stečajnega upravitelja?

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, must the detention of a foreign national for the purpose of return be terminated if he applies for international protection within the meaning of Directive 2005/85/EC and there are no other reasons to keep him in detention?
Če je odgovor na prvo vprašanje pritrdilen, ali mora pridržanje tujca z namenom vrnitve prenehati, če zaprosi za mednarodno zaščito v smislu Direktive 2005/85 in ne obstajajo nobeni drugi razlogi za nadaljevanje njegovega pridržanja?“?

Therefore, the answer to the first question is that Annex II, E(1), to Regulation No 2160/2003 must be interpreted as meaning that fresh poultry meat from the animal populations listed in Annex I to that regulation must satisfy the microbiological criterion mentioned in Annex I, Chapter 1, Row l.
Zato je treba na prvo vprašanje odgovoriti, da je Prilogo II, oddelek E, točka 1, k Uredbi št. 2160/2003 treba razlagati tako, da mora sveže perutninsko meso živalskih populacij, ki so naštete v Prilogi I k tej uredbi, izpolnjevati mikrobiološko merilo iz Priloge I, točka I, vrstica 1.28.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, does the appeal referred to in Article 34(5) of Directive 2016/801 require the Member States, in order to comply with Article 47 of the Charter, to provide that, in certain circumstances, the court may order the authority to issue the visa?
Če je odgovor na prvo vprašanje nikalen, ali pravno sredstvo iz člena 34(5) Direktive 2016/801 državam članicam nalaga, da zaradi upoštevanja člena 47 Listine določijo, da lahko sodišče v nekaterih okoliščinah organu odredi izdajo vizuma?

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, can a passenger or his legal successor effectively demand the payment of the equivalent of EUR 400 in another currency, including, in particular, the national currency of the place of residence of the passenger whose flight was cancelled or delayed?
Če je odgovor na prvo vprašanje pritrdilen, ali lahko potnik ali njegov pravni naslednik veljavno zahteva plačilo zneska, enakovrednega znesku 400 EUR, izraženega v drugi valuti, in sicer v nacionalni valuti, ki velja v kraju prebivališča potnika, katerega let je bil odpovedan ali je imel zamudo?