Examples of using Assembly decided in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The assembly decided not to have a general debate and proceeded with a page-by-page examination of the document.
With a view to the enlargement of the EU to include Bulgaria and Romania and in accordance with Rule 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the assembly decided on a ceiling of 130 members per section.
The Assembly decided not to have a general discussion and proceeded with the examination of the opinion page by page.
Following a request by the President of the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change, Mr Piette, andthe rapporteur, Mr Zbořil, the Assembly decided unanimously to postpone the discussion of this opinion.
The assembly decided to place a new ceiling of 140 on section membership for the current term of office.
In accordance with the amendments to EESC opinions CESE 389/2005(ECO/150) and CESE 391/2005(ECO/152) adopted previously andfollowing a proposal by Ms Mendza-Drozd, the Assembly decided unanimously to amend as follows.
The Assembly decided, by 64 votes to one with five abstentions, to forward the information report.
With a view to the enlargement of the EU to include Bulgaria and Romania and in accordance with Rule 24(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the assembly decided to raise CCMI membership by six three members and three delegates.
The Assembly decided to change the title to" Strategy on Sustainable Development- Messages for Barcelona.
Following the presentation of the opinion by the rapporteur and co-rapporteur andthe general discussion, the Assembly decided by a majority(181 votes to 82 with 11 abstention), to refer the opinion back to the section responsible for re-examination.
The Assembly decided unanimously to implement the simplified procedure for the following opinion Rule 30(3) RP.
Acting on a request by the rapporteur, the Assembly decided to delete the second paragraph of point 7.3 in all the language versions.
The assembly decided unanimously to forward the report of the Section for External Relations, Trade and Development Policy on relations between the EU and the countries bordering the Baltic Sea to the other institutions.
After discussing amendment no. 26, the Assembly decided to postpone examining the opinion until the next plenary session.
The assembly decided to extend the mandate of the Rules of Procedure Panel in order to allow the latter to prepare the Bureau's discussions on the changes to be made to the Implementing Provisions as a result of the partial amendment of the Rules of Procedure and ensure the smooth operation of the EESC after enlargement.
Acting on a request by the rapporteur, the Assembly decided to insert a reference to Article 86(new numbering of Amsterdam Treaty) at the end of point 1.2.
The Assembly decided unanimously to implement the simplified procedure for the following opinions Rule 30(3) of the Rules of Procedure.
In accordance with Rule 77(1), the Assembly decided, by 208 votes to five, with 11 abstentions, that it was necessary to revise the Rules.
The assembly decided by 114 votes to two, with two abstentions, to implement the simplified procedure for the following opinions.
In spite of that, the Croatian Assembly decided unilaterally last year that the environmental/fishing zone would affect the Member States as well from 1 January of this year at the latest.
The Assembly decided by absolute majority(125 votes in favour, three against and 8 abstentions) to amend Rule 32 of the Rules of Procedure as follows.
Following a wide-ranging discussion, the Assembly decided by 80 votes to 32, with 4 abstentions, to suspend examination of the opinion and to leave it to the Bureau to determine how to proceed further.
In addition, the assembly decided to extend the mandate of the Rules of Procedure panel to enable it to prepare the ground for the Bureau's discussions on the implementing provisions following the partial revision of the Rules of Procedure and with a view to the effective functioning of the Committee after the accession of the ten new Member States.
On a Finnish initiative,the UN General Assembly decided last autumn to ask the Secretary General for a proposal on how the UN organization should be developed to allow it to respond more effectively to the enormous challenges ahead.
On 2 March, the Assembly decided to set up a subcommittee responsible for drawing up an own-initiative opinion on Strategic Objectives 2000-2005.
In 2003, the 56th World Health Assembly, decided by means of Resolution 56.28, to establish an Intergovernmental Working Group open to all Member States of WHO, to review and recommend a draft revision of the International Health Regulations.
Should the assembly decide to change the number of sections, it shall also decide on the number of sections to which a member may belong.
The EPC Assembly decides on policy issues developed by five working groups.
We would give the necessary funds, if the assembly decides unanimously that Egypt is in danger.
The Assembly unanimously decided to implement the simplified procedure for the following opinions.