Examples of using Is fundamentally in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Is fundamentally flawed.
This approach is fundamentally wrong.
It is fundamentally the same in each person.
Product structure is fundamentally different.
It is fundamentally wrong, because you only increase in the eyes of the fault.
The theory that human nature is fundamentally evil.
The problem is fundamentally a cultural problem.
However, views of future mothers is fundamentally divided.
That is fundamentally undemocratic and wrong.
I believe your diagnosis of the young man is fundamentally flawed.
Your model is fundamentally flawed.
We hurry to surprise you, this opinion is fundamentally wrong.
All that is fundamentally important for this water forum.
I protest against this ploy because it is fundamentally untrue.
It is fundamentally weak in its reliance on the logic of Principia Mathematica….
My relationship with Chekhov and drama is fundamentally problematic.
He is fundamentally correct in describing the Commission proposal as a temporary measure.
The term"infrasonic house ants repeller" is fundamentally incorrect.
Research is fundamentally international- knowledge and experts circulate throughout the world.
You are attempting to build a life with a man who is fundamentally dishonest.
Our prison system is fundamentally flawed. But tomorrow is always another day.
Maybe because I'm not able to direct if the stage design is fundamentally wrong.
Mr President, access to documents is fundamentally important to our European democracy.
Second, the balance sheet of the transatlantic relationship is fundamentally positive.
All I know is that he is fundamentally decent, which isn't necessarily in vogue these days.
Rather, relative genomic position in relation to a target is fundamentally important.
The system is fundamentally different from the use of other anti-freeze or water as the coolant for heat exchange interconnect.
Many people confuse these insects with ticks, but this is fundamentally wrong.
Such a goal is fundamentally unscientific, as it is hostile to alternative hypotheses for the causes of climate change.
In my view, assuming that there are good and bad foods is fundamentally the wrong approach.