Examples of using Reference to draft article in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was suggested that the reference to draft article 21 was superfluous.
Reference to draft article 51, as adopted, was subsequently made at the 868th, 876th and 887th meetings.
A question was raised whether draft article 12(see para. 50 above)could include a reference to draft article 14.
It was suggested that a reference to draft article 88a(5) should be inserted in draft article 88a(4.
His own delegation was prepared to accept the compromise proposal with the addition of a reference to draft article 50.
The Working Group agreed that a reference to draft article 27 was not necessary in the opening words of the chapeau.
The Chairperson said,he took it that the Commission wished to delete the reference to draft article 45 from paragraph 3.
According to that State, a reference to draft article 10(Separability of treaty provisions) should therefore be considered.
Mr. Tang Houzhi(China) said that his delegation strongly supported the inclusion of a reference to draft article 15 in draft article 3.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that a reference to draft article 10(also advocated by Switzerland) is neither necessary nor useful.
Mr. Shimizu(Japan) said that his delegation was opposed to the inclusion of a reference to draft article 15 in draft article 3.
With reference to draft article 12, it was pointed out that the phrase"such cases as may be provided for by international law" was rather vague.
Mr. Graham(Mexico) said he too opposed the idea of including in draft article 3 a reference to draft article 14, but for a different reason.
The Commission agreed that a reference to draft article 16 bis, paragraph 4, should be inserted in draft article 20, paragraph 1.
His delegation could accept the chapeau of paragraph 2 as proposed with the addition of a reference to draft article 50 as suggested by the representative of Italy.
It was noted that the reference to draft article 58 should be retained in paragraph 1 of draft article 61, as it served the purposes of clarity.
That matter was referred to the drafting group as to the need for the addition of a reference to draft article 25(5), see paras. 170 and 188-191.
With reference to draft article 51 quinquies(1)(c), the Working Group considered the information that should be disclosed to participants during the auction.
Mr. Mollmann(Observer for Denmark) said that he would prefer to leave paragraphs 1 and 2 unchanged andsimply to delete the reference to draft article 45.
However, he had no objection to adding a reference to draft article 50 in paragraph 2(a) of draft article 49 as the representative of Italy had suggested.
Mr. Miller(United States of America) said that he agreed with the observer for the Netherlands;his delegation would prefer simply to delete the reference to draft article 45 as the Danish delegation had proposed.
The first exception came from a reference to draft article 10, which was intended to set a minimum standard from which certification authorities should not be allowed to derogate.
For the sake of meeting the concerns of that delegation, he could support the proposal to clarify the problem in the Guide to Enactment, including a reference to draft article 1.
After discussion, the Working Group decided to maintain the reference to draft article 19 in draft article 22, subject to further deliberation at a future session.
In reference to draft article 2 explaining the purpose of the present draft articles,"the link between a high-quality('adequate and effective') response and meeting the needs of the persons concerned" was underlined in the Commission.
The Working Group approved the substance of draft article 51 subject to the deletion of reference to draft article 49 in paragraph 1(b) and(c) and referred it to the drafting group.
The view was expressed, however, that deleting the reference to draft article 19 might inappropriately weaken the position of the debtor, particularly in case of fraudulent collusion between the assignor and the assignee.
Mr. Rovine(Observer for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York),referring to paragraph 42, said that he wondered why the section of the draft report under discussion omitted any reference to draft article 34 of the revised Rules.
Mr. Shimizu(Japan) said that if draft article 3 contained no reference to draft article 14, in the situation described by the Secretary of the Commission, the rules contained in draft article 3 concerning the free will of the parties would prevail.
Having considered the different views on the draft article, the Commission agreed to approve it andto refer it to the drafting group, with the request to delete the reference to draft article 45 in paragraph 3.