Examples of using Right to an interpreter in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Right to an interpreter.
Constitutional Right to an Interpreter.
Right to an interpreter 53 74.
I have the right to an interpreter.
Right to an Interpreter Section 23N.
They have every right to an interpreter.
The right to an interpreter and translation.
Paragraph 2(b)(vi)- Right to an interpreter.
Right to an Interpreter in Criminal Proceedings.
Section 14- Right to an interpreter.
The Right to the Use of French is not the Right to an Interpreter.
The right to an interpreter.
Recording of hearings and right to an interpreter.
Their right to an interpreter.
Language of the Legal Proceedings and Right to an Interpreter.
Have the right to an interpreter.
The complainant claimed to have been deprived of his right to an interpreter.
The right to an interpreter.
Some states have enacted legislation to guarantee a right to an interpreter.
Have the right to an interpreter.
Problems have also arisen because the provisions are not the only source of law relating to language since certain principles of fundamental justice, such as the right to an interpreter, must also be respected.
There is no right to an interpreter.
When the notice is provided during the hearing, the member may excuse the person concerned from the requirements of Rule 17(1) if he or she thinks that the person ora witness does not have sufficient command of the language of the proceeding see also 6.6.1- Right to an interpreter.
Waiver of the right to an interpreter.
In this case, the Quebec Court of Appeal had to determine whether the appellant was deprived of his right to an English-language jury trial, as provided for in sections 530 and530.1 of the Criminal Code,[1] and whether his right to an interpreter under section 14[2] of the Canadian Charter of.
The PCPCK provides that the defendant has the right to an interpreter so as to be able to understand the proceedings and effectively participate in them.
However, there may be some circumstances that justify a court ordering that an exhibit filed at trial be translated into the language of the accused at the Crown's expense, not based on the language rights in the Criminal Code, but rather based on the principles of fundamental justice, such as the right to make full answer and defence,the right to a fair trial or the right to an interpreter.
Under the terms of the Constitution,in criminal proceedings the right to an interpreter is ensured free of charge.
In light of the importance and status of the right to an interpreter under section 14, this right will be more difficult to waive than may formerly have been the case under the common law and under statutory instruments, such as the Criminal Code and the Canadian Bill of Rights. .
When the application is made during the hearing, the person concerned may be excused from the requirements of Rule 16 and to change the language of the proceeding or make provision for an interpreter if the member believes that the person does not have a sufficient command of the language in which the hearing is to be held, unless the application is abusive ordilatory see also 6.4- Interpreter and 6.6.1- Right to an interpreter.