Examples of using To conditional interpretative declarations in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
This draft guideline must exclude special rules relating to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations, it was pointed out that they were nothing more than a particular category of reservations.
Draft guideline 2.9.10 Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations in principle a State could not be denied the right to formulate a declaration of that kind.
The situation is different with regard to conditional interpretative declarations.
Observation 2001 It would be preferable to simplify the procedure by making it clear that the"guidelines" in relationto reservations would apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.
It might be unwise to align the regime applicable to conditional interpretative declarations too closely with that of reservations.
In the meantime, the Special Rapporteur will continue to pose questions concerning the rules applying to conditional interpretative declarations.
Even though“simple” interpretative declarations/ As opposed to conditional interpretative declarations, which are the subject of draft guideline 1.2.1 1.2.4.
There was a view, however,that the time period for reactions to reservations should not be applicable to conditional interpretative declarations.
Support was expressed for draft guideline 2.9.10,subjecting reactions to conditional interpretative declarations to the same guidelines as those governing reactions to reservations.
His delegation wondered, moreover, whether draft guideline 2.1.8 should not apply,mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.
No special provision concerning alternatives to conditional interpretative declarations appears to be necessary: the alternative procedures listed above are treaty-based and require only the agreement of the contracting parties.
She was in favour of deleting draft guideline 2.9.10 on reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to draft guideline 2.9.10, on reactions to conditional interpretative declarations, his delegation shared the view that such declarations were different from simple interpretative declarations. .
His delegation shared the view that the reservations regime should apply also to conditional interpretative declarations.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations, the Nordic countries agreed with the notion contained in draft guideline 1.2.1 that they did,to a large extent, resemble reservations and therefore often had to be treated as such.
Guidelines 2.6.1 to 2.8.12 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to reactions of States andinternational organizations to conditional interpretative declarations.
Draft guideline 1.3.1 would then apply only to conditional interpretative declarations, and the commentary to it would point to the inadvisability of distinguishing between simple interpretative declarations and reservations.
However, there may be serious doubts about the wisdom of using the same terminology to denote both negative reactions to conditional interpretative declarations and objections to reservations.
This is not the case, however, with regard to conditional interpretative declarations, which require a reaction from other interested States or international organizations; the procedure regarding their formulation must therefore be the same as that used for reservations.
Guideline 2.9.10 provided that the guidelines applicable to reactions to reservations should apply, mutatis mutandis,to reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
According to the same view,the procedure of draft guideline 2.1.8 might apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations in cases where the interpretation of treaty contained in such declaration was manifestly unfounded.
Further, with regard to conditional interpretative declarations, which already have been the subject of considerable debate, we note that guidelines 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 address this issue by placing the entire issue of conditional interpretative declarations under the legal regime of reservations.
It was therefore appropriate to recognize the right of States to recharacterize a conditional interpretative declaration as a reservation and to apply with respect to conditional interpretative declarations the rules on reactions to reservations.
With respect to conditional interpretative declarations, there is hardly any prima facie reason to depart from the rules of form and procedure applicable to the formulation of reservations; by definition, the State or international organization formulating such declarations subjects its consent to be bound to a specific interpretation.
Draft guideline 2.4.2(Formulation of conditional interpretative declarations) was acceptable, but the procedure could be simplified by making it clear that the"guidelines" in relationto reservations would apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.