Examples of using Amendment of mr in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Point 5.4:2: Amendment of Mr Ribbe is accepted;
During the detailed examination of the draft opinion, the amendment of Mr Kienle.
Point 5.5.2: Amendment of Mr Ribbe was accepted;
The amendment of Mr Kienle, to reword 1.12 as follows.
The amendment of Mr Nilsson on point 8.4 was accepted by a majority.
The Committee adopted the amendment of Mr Meghen to delete point 4.1 b.
One amendment of Mr Wolf regarding the point 3.6.3.2 was accepted unanimously by the Assembly.
Point 4.4:Following the interventions of Mr Chagas and Mr Ghigonis, the amendment of Mr Ribbe is adopted by 41 votes in favour, 9 against and 7 abstentions.
The amendment of Mr Lüneborg was accepted 22 votes for, 15 against and 11 abstentions.
Point 3.6.1: Following the intervention of Mr Kamieniecki and Mr Sequeira, the amendment of Mr Siupsinskas is adopted by 56 votes in favour, 3 against and 5 abstentions.1.
Since the amendment of Mr Nyberg was the most radical, he proposed starting with it.
The section adopted the amendment of Mr Kienle for a new point 2.5.1.1.
The amendment of Mr LYONS on paragraph 9.4., was approved by 57 votes, 2 against and 18 abstentions.
During a detailed examination of the document, the section unanimously adopted, with the agreement of the rapporteur, Mr Nyberg's amendment to point 4.5.16(CESE 493/2004 Am.1), subject to the proposed text supplementing rather than replacing the point, and the amendment of Mr Derruine, who proposed adding a new point, 5.6.3 CESE 493/2004 Am.
The section adopted the amendment of Mr Kienle to 2.5.1., slightly modified as follows.
The amendment of Mr Franz to point 3.6.2 was put to the vote and defeated by 21 votes to 25, with 1 abstention.
The Committee adopted the amendment of Mr Giron, to add to the last sentence of point 5.2 as follows.
The Committee adopted the amendment of Mr Giron, to add to the last sentence of point 2.5 as follows.
The Committee adopted the amendment of Mr Gardner to delete and substitute points 3.17 to 3.20.
The Committee rejected the amendment of Mr Koopman and other members, presented in the form of a counter-opinion.
The rapporteur agrees to insert the amendment of Mr Mordant on the introduction of the new points 4.2.5., sub-title 4.3 and point 4.3.1 following the amendment by Mr. Mordant.
Amendments of Mr Kamieniecki.
Amendments of Mr Ribbe.
The amendments of Mr Nyberg were largely accepted with slight modifications.
The amendments of Mr Narró Sánchez and of Mr Nielsen on point 3.7 were withdrawn.
The amendments of Mr Nielsen on points 3.12, 3.13, 3.15, 3.19, 3.22 and 1.5 withdrawn.
Without the amendments of Mr Rocard and Mr Buzek, the directive will reinforce the overly liberal approach to the basic aspects defining the concept of an invention, as well as sanctioning this approach.
