Examples of using Average normal value in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
The weighted average normal value was compared to the weighted average export price to the Community.
Therefore, the claim that"zeroing" is not allowed when comparing a weighted average normal value to all individual export transactions cannot be accepted.
Consequently, a weighted average normal value per tonne based on a product mix equal to the product mix in the original investigation was established.
It has therefore decided, for the purposes of the definitive determination,to revert to the method of comparing the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price.
The weighted average normal value for each product group was compared with the adjusted individual export prices in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic regulation.
Instead of taking the highest normal values found for the two Czech producers,weighted average normal values have been used in the final determination.
The weighted average normal value was compared to the weighted average export price of DBM, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the Basic Regulation, both at fob port producing country level.
In such a case, the methodology set out in the last sentence of Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation,to compare a weighted average normal value to all individual export transactions would become redundant.
The weighted average normal value per product type was compared with the weighted average export price on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
In order to calculate the dumping margin, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value to the average export price to the Community at ex-factory level and at the same level of trade.
The weighted average normal value per grade was compared to the weighted average export price of the corresponding grade of CCM at a fob port producing country level, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the Basic Regulation.
The normal method used to establish whether thereis dumping is to compare the weighted average normal value with the weighted average of all export transactions, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
The weighted average normal value per type of PSF was compared to the weightedaverage export price of the corresponding type, in accordance with Article 2(11) of-the Basic Regulation, on an ex-work basis and at the same level of trade.
The dumping margin for the cooperating producer was established, on a product group basis,by comparing the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Consequently, the third method, namely the comparison of weighted average normal values to individual export prices(asymmetrical method), had to be applied, as in the presence of a pattern of export prices, it was found that neither the first nor the second symmetrical method would have enabled these differences to be taken into account.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of thebasic Regulation, the dumping margin was determined by comparing the weighted average normal value in the analogue country with the average export price per tonne based on Eurostat data.
The comparison of the weighted average export price with the weighted average normal value showed still the existence of dumping during the IP, the dumping margin being equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeded the export price expressed as a percentage of the cif import prices at the Community border, duty unpaid.
Petrotub's dumping margin was, as described in recital 22 of the definitive anti-dumping Regulation,calculated on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value established for Petrotub SA with the prices of all its individual exports.
The comparison of the appropriately revised weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price by product type on an ex-factory basis showed the existence of dumping for all investigated exporting producers.
One Korean exporting producer claimed that the Commission departed from the rule contained in Article 2(11)of the basic Regulation by comparing the weighted average normal value with the individual export prices in order to calculate the dumping margin.
The comparison of the revised, where appropriate, weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price by product type on an ex factory basis showed the existence of dumping for all investigated exporting producers.
According to Baur, a mild winter can be expected, when in the first third, but especially, when in the first half of the month of December thetemperatures are 2.5 degrees Celsius about the average normal values for this period while simultaneously the weather is dominated by low pressure zones from the west.
The exporting producer for which the weighted average normal value was compared to prices of all individual export transactions challenged this methodology. Indeed, the company claimed that there is an economic justification for these limited number of transactions made at non-dumped prices in the last month of the IP, and therefore it is not justified to consider that a pattern of export prices by time period existed.
Since, in these circumstances, the use of the average-to-average method for the calculation of the dumping margin did not reflect the full degree of dumping,it was considered appropriate that weighted average normal values per type be compared to prices of all individual export transactions to the Community, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
The methodology used by the Commission to compare the weighted average normal value with individual export prices fully complies with the rule set out in Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
In its provisional submissions on dumping dated 1 July 1997 and at the hearing on 9 July 1997, the applicant challenged that view, contending that the Commission should have used thesymmetrical method which consists in comparing the weighted average normal value with the weighted average of the prices of all Petrotub's exports to the Community.
In accordance with Articles 2(10) and 2(11) of the Basic Regulation,the weighted average normal value per model was compared with the weighted average export price per model, at ex-factory level and at the same level of trade.
In its reply, the applicant submits that the Community institutions also infringed Article 2(11) of the basic regulation in that they confined themselves to comparing the first of the twosymmetrical methods with the third method under which the weighted average normal value is compared with the prices of individual exports and failed to compare the second symmetrical method with that third method.