Examples of using Cross-border litigation in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Cross-border litigation.
International arbitration and cross-border litigation.
Handling complex cross-border litigation, from pleadings to trial.
These differences also make it difficult to pursue cross-border litigation.
She represents clients in cross-border litigation and in national and international arbitration proceedings.
The EU has put in place a number of measures designed to help individuals with cross-border litigation.
He regularly represents clients in complex and cross-border litigations before courts and administrative bodies.
It is open to discussion if a European order for payment procedure should be exclusively applicable to cross-border litigation.
These problems are inherent in every cross-border litigation irrespective of the contested or uncontested nature of a claim.
They will add further value to our arbitration practice andunderline our leading position in arbitration and cross-border litigation.
The exequatur procedure adds to the complexities of cross-border litigation which deter companies from doing business cross-border trade.
But it is the second level that interests me:to give information to our citizens on how to pursue cross-border litigation.
Cross-border litigation EU, US and Japan, due diligence evaluations on the IP assets of established biotech firms and start-ups. Publications.
He is frequently referred or retained by other lawyers in matters involving cross-border litigation or transactions between U. S.
This Regulation is fundamental to cross-border litigation because it determines which court has jurisdiction in cross-border cases.
Understandably though, attempting to impress everyonein the conference room with your survival skills may not assist in dealing with cross-border litigation, but eDiscovery will.
Massimo Chiasera's practice focuses on white-collar crime, domestic and cross-border litigation as well as international judicial and administrative assistance.
This may be explained by the fact that the procedure is mainly used by companies and lawyers andby the fact that relatively few citizens are involved in cross-border litigation.
He is frequently referred or retained by other lawyers in matters involving cross-border litigation or transactions between U.S. and European parties.
This proposal aims to develop a similar mechanism in relation to judicial cooperation incivil and commercial matters and therefore on cross-border litigation.
Difficulties with which citizens are intrinsically confronted in cross-border litigation, be it in civil or in criminal matters, should be neutralised as much as possible.
Of course, the high and expanding volume of trade within the EU and the increased movement of people raise the likelihood that more andmore businesses may become involved in cross-border litigation.
Due to the costs related to cross-border procedures, cross-border litigation may give rise to serious difficulties, especially for citizens with modest financial resources.
The implementation of the mutual recognition principle in sensitive areas such as parental responsibility andthe simplification of the rules on cross-border litigation have allowed undeniable progress to be made.
Taken as a whole, they enhance predictability in cross-border litigation by ensuring a genuinely free circulation of judgments based on the principle of mutual recognition and enhance the respect of fundamental rights, in particular the rights of the child, by providing the necessary safeguards.
The fact that national legal aid schemes do not take into account the extra costs of cross-border litigation translations of documents, double legal advice, service of documents, etc.
Activities with this objective could be, for example, user guides, information campaigns or set-up andmanagement of information systems targeted at groups specifically concerned with cross-border litigation.
The Tampere Conclusions speak of special common procedural rules for simplified andaccelerated cross-border litigation on“small consumer and commercial claims, as well as maintenance claims”.
The Commission further announced in its consumer policy action plan 1999-2001 a number of initiatives concerning consumers' access to justice.32 In line with this action plan, it published in February 2000 a GreenPaper on Legal Aid in Civil Matters33 in cross-border litigation.
Thus the European Council in Tampere called on the Commission to establish"minimum standards ensuring an adequate level of legal aid in cross-border cases throughout the Union as well as special common procedural rules for simplified andaccelerated cross-border litigation on small consumer and commercial claims, as well as maintenance claims and on uncontested claims.