Examples of using Poststructuralism in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
In poststructuralism, praxis is never seen as pure; it is relative.
The heterolingual intimacy: a constructive dialogue with poststructuralism.
Poststructuralism, deconstructuralism, Focault, Derrida, Roland Barthes- I feel dizzy.
 The heterolingual intimacy: a constructive dialogue with poststructuralism.
Poststructuralism is a multifaceted critique which throws the essentials of Wilber's entire system into question.
This also allowsasserting the opposite of the successor thesis of structuralism and poststructuralism.
Postmodernism Poststructuralism is one aspect of what may be a larger societal shift called postmodernism.
His research focus is on Animal Studies, performance aesthetics, poststructuralism, new materialism and pragmatism.
Through this new form, Land effectively reignited what he saw as being the fundamental stakes of Heideggerianism,structuralism and poststructuralism.
He commends poststructuralism for saying that no perspective is final, but condemns it for saying that this means that no perspective is better than any other.
His main research interests are in political, legal and social philosophy,especially critical theory and poststructuralism.
Poststructuralism is something, so to speak, which becomes a necessity, with outset in an every day reality of mingling with a variety of scientific communities of which one becomes an integrated part.
Wilber's integral project can beread as a reaction to what he sees as the fragmenting effects of poststructuralism and postmodernism.
The term"poststructuralism" paradoxically first appeared in English-speaking countries, specifically as a word designating philosophical, literary, political and artistic theories, which emerged particularly in France in the 1960s and 1970s.
Compared to the most recent compositions of the former years,whose common denominator was attributable to a sort of"utopian poststructuralism"(Gaetano Mercadante).
All of this cuts to the heart of Wilber's project, but when he periodically mentions poststructuralism he repeats a"contexts within contexts" mantra and counters any relativistic difficulty by saying these"sliding contexts" slide in regular patterns.
This shift, however-reflected in a form of writing as a dissonant subject evading straight grammatical norms-can provide themissing link between Marxist art history and poststructuralism.
Kelleter seems to have a generally dim view ofsuch tests; otherwise, he would not sweepingly place neo-naturalist attempts at explanation alongside psychoanalysis, poststructuralism, and Marxism- in other words, alongside supertheories that have either made themselves immune to refutations or have been refuted.
The mutual references between French poststructuralism and Italian post-Operaism are generally just as manifold as the ways both currents refer to Marx and distance themselves from him, however the concrete relation between the two aspects of the small Marx fragment(machine- General Intellect) got lost on both sides.
These structures are understood and examined as frameworks for the perceptions and, therefore, the decisions of individual and collective actors, particularly in reflectivist approaches constructivism, feminism, poststructuralism, postcolonial and critical theories.
In this way, maybe the label“poststructuralism”, which has never been much more than an impossible auxiliary construction tying together completely different theoretical currents, will finally become wholly obsolete after years of being increasingly hollowed out and emptied, and will be replaced by a new assemblage of concepts.
By extracting some concepts which can be associated with a poststructural perspective and incorporating them into his integral synthesis,Wilber avoids the fundamental challenges that poststructuralism poses to his system and to knowledge acquisition in general.
The spirit of Derrida's and Foucault's poststructuralism is captured better by David Hoy when he writes that"Not only do Foucault and Derrida give up humanism's belief in epistemological progress, they also give up its belief in social-historical progress, which is the fifth and last, but probably most important feature of the critique of humanism.
By extracting some concepts which can be associated with a poststructural perspective and incorporating them into his integral synthesis,Wilber avoids the fundamental challenges that poststructuralism poses to his system and to knowledge acquisition in general.
Wilber sidesteps this critique and reduces it to the idea that poststructuralism essentially agrees with his holarchic view because“a close look at their work shows that it is driven precisely by a conception of holons within holons, of texts within texts within texts(or contexts within contexts within contexts), and it is the sliding play of texts within texts that forms the'foundationless' platform from which they launch their attacks.
Frances Daly's critical evaluation of Agamben's attempt to rethink the categories of"individual","citizen","sovereignty", and"general will" that underpin the discourseof rights could be cited here as a final example of the kind of constructive dialogue with poststructuralism needed to fashion a new concept of heterolingual intimacy that could be mobilized against contemporary biopolitical violence on a global scale.
Poststructuralism emerged in a climate of searching movements, which was marked by philosophical and political struggles and developments: by the debate on human sciences and structuralism, by the development of the nouveau roman and the filmic innovation of nouvelle vague, by the crisis of old ideologies and new political and existential experiments- and most of all: Would poststructuralism even have been possible without 1968 and the events that followed 1968?