Examples of using Priority year in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
USPTO patents granted by priority year.
EPO data refer to all patent applications by priority year, as opposed to patents granted by priority year, which is the case with USPTO data.
EPO patent applications by priority year.
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year Patents granted by the USPTO by priority year.
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year.
You can receive the search results within the priority year and make a timely decision on protecting in other countries.
Table A. 6.1: Number of EPO Patent Applications By Priority Year.
If the last day of the priority year falls on a non-working day oran official holiday of the EPO, the priority year expires on the next subsequent working day.
Table A.6.5: Number of USPTO Granted Patents By Priority Year.
Although the closest date to invention is the priority year, i.e. the year in which the patent was first applied for at any patent office, no complete data are available for the most recent years. .
These were received by the latter only after the priority year had expired.
Consequently, the data re lating to the priority years after 1991 are not complete, since some patents filed during this period are still pending,and as a re sult the data by priority year for 1992 to 1994 have been estimated.
Table Α.6.1: Number of EPO Patent Applications By Priority Year continued.
Table 3: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year, as a ratio of GDP in EUR billion, per million inhabitants, per million labour force and total number, by country, EU-27 Member States and selected countries, 1999, 2003, 2004(estimates) and AAGR.
Triadic patent families by earliest priority year at the national level.
Table 7: Patents granted by the USPTO by IPC section, as a percentage of total patents granted, EU-27 and selected countries,2000 priority year.
Since 2005,Eurostat has been producing the patent statistics using the priority year of the application, and not the year of filing as previously.
However, a relevant search can be carried out within three months anda patent granted in the priority year on request.
Table 4: Patents granted by the USPTO by priority year, as a ratio of GDP in EUR billion, per million inhabitants, per million labour force and total number, by country, EU-27 Member States and selected countries, 1996, 2000, 2001(estimates) and AAGR.
This seems to indicate that D4 was published within the priority year of the patent 1999.
Number of EPO Patent Applications by Priority Year Number of EPO Patent Applications by PublicationYear Number of EPO Patent Applications by Selected Economic Activity by Publication Year Number of European Patent Applications by Region and by Year of Filing Number of USPTO Granted Patents by Priority Year Number of USPTO Granted Patents by Publication Year Number of USPTO Granted Patents by Selected Economic Activity by Publication Year Number of National Patents in Mediterranean countries.
Table 9: Distribution of triadic patent families, EU-25,Japan and United States, by priority years 1990, 1995 and 2000, as% of total.
Table 5: Patent applications to the EPO by IPC section, total number and as a percentage of total patent applications, EU-27 and selected countries,2003(priority year) in.
The filing date of the international application was 3 February 1989 andtherefore it was within the priority year of the 4 February 1988 application and in time to claim priority therefrom.
Figure 5: Patent applications to the EPO with foreign co-inventors by country as a percentage of the total in selected countries with more than ten patent applications,2002 priority year.
Figure 7: Foreign ownership of domesticinventions in patent applications to the EPO by country, for the priority years 1998, 2003, as a percentage of total and AAGR.
The referral T 377/95(Reasons point 27) cites Loth(Münchner Gemeinschaftskommentar, Article 55 EPC, point 65), who, referring to the high percentage of European applications claiming priority, takes the view that the non-cumulation of the six-month period with the priority year would make Article 55 EPC more or less meaningless and undermine the right of priority. .
Defining political priorities year on year, is not just the job of the Council and the Commission, it is also the job of the European Parliament.