Examples of using Qualification directive in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
QUALIFICATION DIRECTIVE.
The Commission adopted proposals amending the Asylum Procedures and the Qualification Directives.
In his application, Shepherd relies on the Qualification Directive of the European Union, which has been in force since October 2006.
Whether a measure is tied to religion as a reason forpersecution is found within Art 10 of the Qualification Directive;
You are familiar with all this; they are the Qualification Directive, the Dublin Regulation, the Eurodac Regulation, and the Long-term Residence Directive. .
All EU Member States are signatories tothat Convention and, at EU level, their obligations are reflected in the Qualification Directive 2.
We intend to reach a political agreement in the discussion on the Qualification Directive, as well as in the field of the Dublin Regulation, before the end of the Hungarian Presidency.
These modifications reflect a long standing objective of the Commission policy on asylum7 andaim at ensuring consistency with the Qualification Directive.
It is proposed to replace the current recast Qualification Directive with a Regulation.
The qualification directive providing for better, clearer and more harmonised standards for identifying persons in need of international protection was adopted in November 2011 and entered into force in January 2012 17435/11.
This modification is considered necessary with a view to ensuring consistency with the EU acquis,namely with the Qualification Directive which introduced the legal notion of subsidiary protection.
The Qualification Directive was thus adopted with a view to define common criteria for the identification of persons in need of international protection and to ensure that at least a minimum level of benefits is available for these persons in all Member States.
This modification is considered necessary with a view to ensure consistency with the current EU acquis,namely with the Qualification Directive that introduces the legal notion of subsidiary protection.
The Qualification Directive(2004/83/EC) was designed to define common criteria for the identification of persons in need of international protection and to ensure that at least a minimum level of benefits is available for these persons in all Member States.
A single procedure on applications for international protection as defined in the Qualification Directive will reinforce the potential for an effective return process within the Common European Asylum System.
Taking into consideration the serious gaps pointed out by many commentators and stakeholders, the Commission decided to propose the procedural guarantees andnotions which are instrumental in ensuring reliable determinations in line with the Qualification Directive.
After the delays in transposition of the Reception Conditions Directive and the Qualification Directive, this delay is indeed disappointing, particularly because it occurs at the time when there is a strong political will to complete the second phase of the Common European Asylum System.
Even after an application for international protection has been rejected, a person must be able to reapply if his/her circumstances have changed, inorder to take into account the possibility of"sur place" claims in line with the Qualification Directive.
The European Commission commissioned two external studies in 201519,one of which is focusing on the application of the present Qualification Directive by the Member States, and the other examining implementation problems, identifying shortcomings and assessing whether the current recast Qualification Directive has led to greater convergence in Europe.
The provision specifies that the identification of special reception needs is without prejudice to the examination of an application of international protection, in order to clarify that such reception needsmay not be relevant to the conditions for being granted international protection status under the Qualification Directive.
With this in mind, I would ask for clarification on three points. Why is Article 15(c)of the 2004 Qualification Directive, which grants the right to subsidiary protection to persons who are subject to, and I quote,'serious and individual threat[...] by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict' so poorly implemented?
INVITES the Commission to present, before the end of the year, a One Stop Shop Action Plan which ensures that such practical cooperation is the vehicle for identifying the necessary steps to be taken in order for Member States to arrive at a single procedure for theassessment of applications for international protection as defined in the Qualification Directive.
This proposal for a recast of the Reception Conditions Directive is fully consistent with the first proposals to reform the Common European Asylum System presented on 4 May 2016,and with the proposals for reforming the Asylum Procedures and Qualification Directives, which would include their transformation into Regulations, as well as with the proposal for a structured Union resettlement framework.
It is proposed to replace the current recast Qualification Directive with a Regulation, in view of achieving more convergence in asylum decision-making, by changing the present optional rules providing common criteria for recognising asylum applicants to obligatory rules, by further clarifying and specifying the content of international protection(in particular as regards the duration of residence permits and social rights) and by establishing rules aimed at preventing secondary movements.
The further approximation of rules on the recognition and content of refugee and subsidiary protection status should moreover help to limit the secondary movement of applicants for international protection and beneficiaries of international protection between Member States, where such movementmay have been caused by any differences in the national legal measures taken to transpose the Qualification Directive replaced by this Regulation.
Clarification that beneficiaries of resettlement schemes will be granted refugee status under the Geneva Convention and refugee,or subsidiary protection status as defined in the Qualification Directive, guaranteeing respect for their fundamental rights under all circumstances and clarification that a population of“undecided cases” without specific rights in the EU or third countries where they are resettled will not be established de facto.
In his application, André Shepherd appealed to the Qualifications Directive of the European Union.
This court has taken on particular importance in the asylum proceedings because it can already be called on by the lower courts whilst proceedings are pending to hand down a“preliminary ruling” on cases of doubt under Community law-for instance with regard to the Qualifications Directive.
The development of the CEAS is based on a number of legislative proposals:the directives on Reception Conditions and Asylum Procedures; the Qualifications directive; the Dublin regulation; and the Eurodac regulation.
Insofar as the IMI system willidentify national obstacles preventing the Services and Professional Qualifications Directives from being properly implemented, define a possible specific warning and/or penalty system to remove these obstacles;