Examples of using Rebase in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
The merge and the rebase.
Continue a rebase with resolved conflicts.
At this point you should not rebase your work.
Continue a rebase that stopped because of conflicts.
We took a high level look at the git rebase process.
People also translate
But the always rebase field is also pretty vocal online.
This listing defines exactly what the branch will look like after the rebase is performed.
Abort the rebase and put the repository in its original state.
If you haven't set up the remote repo yet,do it before trying to rebase.
Abort the rebase and return the repository to its previous state.
Either option is perfectly valid, butat least now you have the option of leveraging the benefits of git rebase.
You can also have your rebase replay on something other than the rebase branch.
If you use pull requests as part of your code review process,you need to avoid using git rebase after creating the pull request.
Rebase as cleanup is a healthy part of the coding lifecycle of the git practitioner.
For more details on what this and rebase--preserve-merges do, please check Stack Overflow's answer.
Rebase your local branch on top of the updates from upstream and do a force push onto your remote branch.
The first step in any workflow that leverages git rebase is to create a dedicated branch for each feature.
This will rebase the fetched commits onto your local branches so that they match their remote counterparts.
Everyone works on master,nobody works on branches and every single developer uses rebase to keep up-to-date with the latest changes.
So, before you run git rebase, always ask yourself,"Is anyone else looking at this branch?
To modify older or multiple commits,you can use git rebase to combine a sequence of commits into a new base commit.
When calling git rebase, you have two options for the new base: The feature's parent branch(e.g., master), or an earlier commit in your feature.
As we have discussed previously in rewriting history,you should never rebase commits once they have been pushed to a public repository.
The rebase would replace the old commits with new ones and it would look like that part of your project history abruptly vanished.
When you save and close the file,Git will perform the rebase according to your instructions, resulting in project history that looks like the following.
Its git merge and git rebase commands offer alternative ways to integrate commits from different branches, and both options come with their own advantages.
Utilizing git rebase during the review and merge stages of a feature branch will create enforce a cohesive Git history of feature merges.
Eventually you will want to rebase against master and at that time it may contain many new commits that your branch changes may conflict with.
Note that this rebase doesn't violate the Golden Rule of Rebasing because only your local feature commits are being moved-everything before that is untouched.
In standard mode, git rebase allows you to literally rewrite history- automatically applying commits in your current working branch to the passed branch head.