Examples of using Subgroup analysis in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Forest plot for subgroup analysis of overall survival ITT population.
Patients with missing cirrhosis status were excluded from this subgroup analysis.
Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a high risk of mortality i.e. an APACHE II score of.
Table 5: Summary of results from exploratory subgroup analysis from Imlygic study 005/05.
Subgroup analysis investigated whether the effects of the intervention were dependent on severity of cognitive impairment.
These differences did not reach statistical significance as this subgroup analysis was not powered for these endpoints.
Table 14 presents the subgroup analysis by genotype for cirrhosis and exposure to prior HCV treatment.
Figure 5: Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival by randomised treatment arm for diseasestage IIIB/IIIC/ stage IVM1a exploratory subgroup analysis.
Table 10 presents the subgroup analysis by genotype for cirrhosis and interferon classification.
Follicular versus non-follicular was also a stratification factor for the study butis not applicable in the subgroup analysis of patients with follicular lymphoma.
The subgroup analysis on 1-year mortality revealed no significant effect of early tracheostomy i.e., within one week of intubation;
The results presented atASCO 2012 included new data from the subgroup analysis, including data on the patient's tumor KRAS mutation status.
A subgroup analysis of the failed ARISER study demonstrated that patients with high CAIX values were likely to benefit from treatment.
Results are shown in the table below results for the group of metastatic andlocally advanced patients are derived from exploratory subgroup analysis.
In a subgroup analysis, patients with pre-treatment total IgE≥ 76 IU/ ml were more likely to experience clinically meaningful benefit to Xolair.
Proportions of Subjects in the Once Daily versus Twice Daily Abacavir+Lamivudine Randomisation of ARROW with Plasma HIV-1 RNA<80 copies/ml: Subgroup Analysis by Formulation.
A subgroup analysis has shown, however, that eradication only protects NSAID-naÃ̄ve patients, not patients being treated with NSAID.
The association between the baseline characteristics of the CRT-D population after replacement andthe risk of subsequent ventricular tachyarrhythmia will be explored in a subgroup analysis.
A subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-002 in patients who were BRAF wild type(n=415; 77%) or BRAF mutant with prior BRAF treatment(n=125; 23%) was performed.
Given the small sample size and baseline imbalances resulting from subgroup analysis, no conclusion can be drawn regarding asthma efficacy in the paediatric population.
In subgroup analysis we found no evidence of a difference in treatment effect for zanamivir on time to first alleviation of symptoms in adults in the influenza-infected and non-influenza-infected subgroups P 0.53.
Exploratory subgroup analysis on cognitive(MMSE) and activities of daily living(ETAM) abilities by severity of cognitive impairment and weekly frequency of attendance at day care center(n 362) Enlarge All figures.
A subgroup analysis of the virologic response(defined as a viral load< 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml) at week 24 by baseline viral load and baseline CD4 count(pooled DUET data) is presented in the table below.
Further exploratory subgroup analysis revealed a treatment effect of 26 m,(95% CI: 5 m to 46 m) in patients pre-treated with ERAs(n=167) and a treatment effect of 101 m(95% CI: 27 m to 176 m) in patients pre-treated with prostacyclin analogues n=27.
In a subgroup analysis by qualifying condition(myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and PAD) the benefit appeared to be strongest(achieving statistical significance at p 0.003) in patients enrolled due to PAD(especially those who also had a history of myocardial infarction) RRR 23.7%; CI.
Overall response and a subgroup analysis of the virologic response(< 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) at both 48 weeks and 96 weeks, and virologic failure by baseline viral load(pooled data from the two Phase 3 clinical studies, TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215, for patients receiving the FTC/TDF BR) is presented in Table 4.
In a subgroup analysis of people with follicular lymphoma, the most common type of iNHL, treatment with Gazyva®/Gazyvaro®(obinutuzumab) plus bendamustine provided significantly greater depth of remission at end of induction compared to bendamustine alone, as measured by minimal residual disease(MRD)-negativity(82% vs 43%, respectively; p< 0.0001)1.
In a subgroup analysis in patients 6 to 11 years of age(8 patients on placebo and 9 patients on ivacaftor), the placebo group showed an improvement in mean percent predicted FEV1 from 94.0% at baseline to 98.4% post-baseline; the ivacaftor group showed a slight decline in mean FEV1 from 97.5% at baseline to 96.2% overall post-baseline.
In a subgroup analysis by qualifying condition(myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and PAD) the benefit appeared to be strongest(achieving statistical significance at p 0.003) in patients enrolled due to PAD(especially those who also had a history of myocardial infarction)(RRR 23.7%; CI: 8.9 to 36.2) and weaker(not significantly different from ASA) in stroke patients RRR 7.3%; CI: -5.7 to.